Liberal Forum

jerrab » Today, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:25 am

the justice system. where criminals get convicted for the crimes they commit. where people who smash windows receive punishment. if you have a problem wth this i guess you don't care if your car windows get smashed or your house windows.

You and I are looking through different lenses at this justice system. I see it as two-tiered and weaponized, You see it as dispassionate and respectable. You see the proper response to the aftermath of J6 a dusting of one's hands, with a muttered, "That ought to show them." I see the proper response as raised eyebrows, widened eyes, a dropped jaw and a clenched first - and hearty approval of the president's use of the pardon power. 

We see J6 through discordant lenses. You saw a group of people who went LCD spontaneously and began committing heinous crimes to overthrow an honest election - the most honest and transparent election in the history of the nation, by all accounts that are not racist hitler proud boy treasonous accounts. 

I saw a psy-op that was planned in advance, that was orchestrated using federal plants by the scores or perhaps hundreds to provoke and incite the crowd to those LCD actions, and that manipulated events in advance to cause an insufficient immediate police response. I have watched congressional investigations which demonstrated an unwillingness on behalf of corrupt DOJ officials to answer congressional subpoenas inquiring how many federal agents and paid provocateurs on retainer were salted within the crowd - or what their orders were. I have seen sworn testimony verifying that Pelosi - who had full jurisdiction as the shot-caller - repeatedly refused to have sufficient police on hand for the demonstration, which was dubbed "STOP THE STEAL" - a moniker indicative of the mood that might be expected within the throng. I have seen obvious federal agents whose actions to incite the crowd were caught on camera but who were not prosecuted for months or years until the hue and cry could not be stifled - and then their "prosecutions" were pro-forma exercises in leniency.

I know that the overwhelming majority of the - let's refer to them as party-goers - the overwhelming majority of the party goers were second amendment types. And yet not one gun was brandished by other than police. So the pretense that a plan existed to overthrow the government is - and I will use the scientific language here - radically homosexual. 

I saw a psy op. You saw a mob. Naturally, we are going to disagree on what ought to have been done in response to two different things. If I had seen what you saw, or if you had seen what I saw, we might be on the same page. Instead, here I am, firmly in the heterosexual camp, and there you are, rubbing shoulders and paling around with...