But…the GUBMINT shouldn’t interfere with the fREe mArkEt eCoNomY Post #638128 • Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » Today, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:13 am
That story isn't even a "likely" story. BUSH rolled out the housing for everyone program. BUSH pushed it. BUSH signed it. No one overrode his veto. He ORIGINATED that program. His appointees executed it. His party voted for it.

Your position isn't just gay. It's sandwich making gay. That's where ya suck the guy off, and then ya get up like a bitch and make that *** a sandwich.

It's also pure neocon drivel. If america is threatened, it's because of your policies - not because of the way we spell our name or wear our man purses. This *** nation is bringing the **** on itself.

You're so full of **** sometimes:

Carter was responsible for passing the Community Reinvestment Act. Wet Willie Clinton was responsible for amendments to the CRA and and increased enforcement pressure (i.e. lax lending practices) in the 1990s and early 2000s
Clinton incentivized banks to loosen lending standards. This laid part of the foundation for the subprime mortgage boom. Wall Street took advantage of Clinton's loose lending policies securitizing huge numbers of "FREE MONEY 'n SHEET" loans, which triggered the 2007–08 housing collapse.
All Bush did was promote HUD loans to penniless, but employed Blacks. Ironically, these loans didn't fail. HUD kept these in-house. And, because the HUD programs made sure all recipients had actual, verifiable jobs, AND that they would be living in these houses, this simply was not part of the problem Clinton-Democrats created.