Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

Tiny,

Please stop.

You've had your *** kicked 75 times on this already.

Take all those Ls.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Jan 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:20 am

I see 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

Tiny,

Please stop.

You've had your *** kicked 75 times on this already.

Take all those Ls.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:23 am

You suck at seeing.

1.  Veghead:
         “Are these your words” or posting my threads 

My reply:

Didn't click it

I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.




2. Veghead:
              For your “The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source." 

My reply: 
             My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external         verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."AI's reply:AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.” That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. And  Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background. At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.   

3. For your demands/question 
Reply:
        **** your questions. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing. ↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓Is your toothbrush REALLY clean?




4. For your usual lies about answering the survivorship Bias question 
Reply:
         The question is not asking for definitions.
         The question is not asking what the answer is not: it is asking what it is.

5. For you accusing me of what you are guilty of.
My reply: 
       projecting again

6. For your incessant copying of me:
My reply: 
       Copies me again. pile up that evidence.

7. For your pic:
Prove you answered the first time and then you will demand I prove a negative.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Jan 2026, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:53 am

Thanks for remind me. 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:00 pm

This is why AI laughs at you.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:26 am

There is no context, 

Vegas » 10 Jan 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:01 pm

Still projecting, I see. 

Hi Mary.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm

Every single one

24/7/365

Your fee fees will NEVER trump citations.

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:26 am

There is no context, 

Every single one

24/7/365

Your fee fees will NEVER trump citations. 

 

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm

You would have to come out from hiding first, Too Far

You have my address.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm

I don't hide.


 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

JohnnyYou » 10 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm

Keep on Trollin'

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm

You would have to come out from hiding first, Too Far

You have my address.

Tiny,

I don't hide.


And it isn't even Match.


 

 

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:11 pm

I was 30 miles or so 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:13 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:11 pm

I was 30 miles or so away. After years of threats you stayed huddled with your binky in your duplex.  The Salem Keyboard Komando was afraid to travel 30 **** mile to back up his threats.

Yup, in that case, cowardice and caution was the better part of valor.

Nothing ore to say on that.  And remember, before you lie about, you did not know where I was staying until year or two later.  ;)
 

Thread discipline, Yappy!

 

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm

Shove

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm

Reap what you yap.

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm

Shove

Reap what you yap.

 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:21 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:18 pm

Thread 

This is discipline.