Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 8:27 am

Trump proposes massive increase in 2027 defense spending to $1.5 trillion to build 'Dream Military'

Every single **** iteration of Supply Side has done the same thing.

Boost defense spending 8-10% EVERY YEAR.

Because it's FREE. A gift from the Supply Side Fairy.

KUMBAYA!

I swear, these people are too stupid to water...

PhiloBeddo » 10 Jan 2026, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:37 am

We could cut taxes in half if Dems didn't steal. Corruption is killing us.

chase me

fried
I live rent free in your mind

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 8:27 am

Trump proposes massive increase in 2027 defense spending to $1.5 trillion to build 'Dream Military'

Every single **** iteration of Supply Side has done the same thing.

Boost defense spending 8-10% EVERY YEAR.

Because it's FREE. A gift from the Supply Side Fairy.

KUMBAYA!

I swear, these people are too stupid to water...

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:42 am

What?  Nothing about Jan 6th?  You must have taken your meds.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 8:27 am

Trump proposes massive increase in 2027 defense spending to $1.5 trillion to build 'Dream Military'

Every single **** iteration of Supply Side has done the same thing.

Boost defense spending 8-10% EVERY YEAR.

Because it's FREE. A gift from the Supply Side Fairy.

KUMBAYA!

I swear, these people are too stupid to water...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

LowIQTrash » 10 Jan 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:29 am

Project 2025, which the Orange Pedo is following almost to the letter, calls for an increase in taxes on median inc households by $3000/yr 

I'm going on a limb and saying most people won't notice after it's quietly implemented (like the tariff nonsense and TACO last yr that served as distraction)

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:05 pm

You convince them that deportation metrics matter.

These idiots don't know any better...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Jan 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:05 pm

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm

I still can't understand 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:04 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:42 am

What?  Nothing about Jan 6th?  You must have taken your meds.

I know Jan 6th cuts toadies deep...

But I don't really care...toadies' fee fees are a target rich environment. 

 

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:09 pm

Doesn't cut me deep, 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm

You care enough to lie about it.

You melt down over references to it.

I'd say that's cutting quite deep.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:09 pm

Doesn't cut me deep, Ball Less wonder.  On the day it happened I posted that those scaling the wall should have been shot.  I also posted that those where complicit in breaking into the Capitol and were violent should not have been pardoned.

How many more lies you gonna tell about me today, Too Far?  You don't know ****, Coward., 

You care enough to lie about it.

You melt down over references to it.

I'd say that's cutting quite deep.
 

 

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm

And there is another lie.  Too bad you were not man en ough to say that to my face.


 

LowIQTrash » 10 Jan 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:29 am

Project 2025, which the Orange Pedo is following almost to the letter, calls for an increase in taxes on median inc households by $3000/yr 

 

Huey » 10 Jan 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:42 am

What?  Nothing about Jan 6th?  You must have taken your meds.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

*Roshambo » 10 Jan 2026, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 11:40 am

Phil,
DOGE, remember 

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."