Liberal Forum

Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 4:20 pm

Minnesota ICE operation continues, netting 10 killers, violent child rapists — but lefty pols want agents out

Here is a preview:

Shooting at Vehicles 

Fifteen cases were reviewed where shots were fired at or into vehicles by CBP agents. 

Observations: 

Based on a review of the submitted cases, it appears that CBP practice allows shooting at the driver of any suspect vehicle that comes in the direction of agents. It is suspected that in many vehicle shooting cases, the subject driver was attempting to flee from the agents who intentionally put themselves into the exit path of the vehicle, thereby exposing themselves to additional risk and creating justification for the use of deadly force. In most of these cases, the agents have stated that they were shooting at the driver of a vehicle that was coming at them and posing an imminent threat to their life. In some cases, passengers were struck by agents’ gunfire. Little focus has been placed on defensive tactics that could have been used by shooting agents such as getting out of the way. It should be recognized that a ½ ounce (200 grain) bullet is unlikely to stop a 4,000 pound moving vehicle, and if the driver of the approaching vehicle is disabled by a bullet, the vehicle will become a totally unguided threat. Obviously, shooting at a moving vehicle can pose a risk to bystanders including other agents. 

The cases suggest that some of the shots at suspect vehicles are taken out of frustration when agents who are on foot have no other way of detaining suspects who are fleeing in a vehicle. 
Most reviewed cases involved non-violent suspects who posed no threat other than a moving vehicle. 
There is little doubt that the safest course for an agent faced with an oncoming vehicle is to get out of the way of the vehicle. 
CBP policy should be “Agents shall not discharge their firearms at or from a moving vehicle unless deadly physical force is being used against the police officer or another person present, by means other than a moving vehicle.” Training and policy changes should be implemented to implement this policy.

https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files ... Report.pdf
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:08 am

Shooting at Vehicles 

Fifteen cases were reviewed where shots were fired at or into vehicles by CBP agents. 

Observations: 

Based on a review of the submitted cases, it appears that CBP practice allows shooting at the driver of any suspect vehicle that comes in the direction of agents. It is suspected that in many vehicle shooting cases, the subject driver was attempting to flee from the agents who intentionally put themselves into the exit path of the vehicle, thereby exposing themselves to additional risk and creating justification for the use of deadly force. In most of these cases, the agents have stated that they were shooting at the driver of a vehicle that was coming at them and posing an imminent threat to their life. In some cases, passengers were struck by agents’ gunfire. Little focus has been placed on defensive tactics that could have been used by shooting agents such as getting out of the way. It should be recognized that a ½ ounce (200 grain) bullet is unlikely to stop a 4,000 pound moving vehicle, and if the driver of the approaching vehicle is disabled by a bullet, the vehicle will become a totally unguided threat. Obviously, shooting at a moving vehicle can pose a risk to bystanders including other agents. 

The cases suggest that some of the shots at suspect vehicles are taken out of frustration when agents who are on foot have no other way of detaining suspects who are fleeing in a vehicle. 
Most reviewed cases involved non-violent suspects who posed no threat other than a moving vehicle. 
There is little doubt that the safest course for an agent faced with an oncoming vehicle is to get out of the way of the vehicle. 
CBP policy should be “Agents shall not discharge their firearms at or from a moving vehicle unless deadly physical force is being used against the police officer or another person present, by means other than a moving vehicle.” Training and policy changes should be implemented to implement this policy.

https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files ... Report.pdf

That's nice   

What about the child rapist, sex traffickers, and murderers?  Let them roam free?

Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:11 am

That's nice   

What about the child rapist, sex traffickers, and murderers?  Let them roam free?

It's much more than "nice", Toady...

It's real....and why you're being fed the propaganda you are eagerly recatapulting.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:17 am

Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:11 am

That's nice   

What about the child rapist, sex traffickers, and murderers?  Let them roam free?

It's much more than "nice", Toady...

It's real....and why you're being fed the propaganda you are eagerly recatapulting.

 

Go start a thread and tag me.  This is about the criminal illegals that have been caught.  

Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:21 am

Go start a thread 

Controlly,

Stop pretending you understand the issue.

Your job is to carry the water.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:08 am

Shooting at Vehicles 

Fifteen cases were reviewed where shots were fired at or into vehicles by CBP agents. 

Observations: 

Based on a review of the submitted cases, it appears that CBP practice allows shooting at the driver of any suspect vehicle that comes in the direction of agents. It is suspected that in many vehicle shooting cases, the subject driver was attempting to flee from the agents who intentionally put themselves into the exit path of the vehicle, thereby exposing themselves to additional risk and creating justification for the use of deadly force. In most of these cases, the agents have stated that they were shooting at the driver of a vehicle that was coming at them and posing an imminent threat to their life. In some cases, passengers were struck by agents’ gunfire. Little focus has been placed on defensive tactics that could have been used by shooting agents such as getting out of the way. It should be recognized that a ½ ounce (200 grain) bullet is unlikely to stop a 4,000 pound moving vehicle, and if the driver of the approaching vehicle is disabled by a bullet, the vehicle will become a totally unguided threat. Obviously, shooting at a moving vehicle can pose a risk to bystanders including other agents. 

The cases suggest that some of the shots at suspect vehicles are taken out of frustration when agents who are on foot have no other way of detaining suspects who are fleeing in a vehicle. 
Most reviewed cases involved non-violent suspects who posed no threat other than a moving vehicle. 
There is little doubt that the safest course for an agent faced with an oncoming vehicle is to get out of the way of the vehicle. 
CBP policy should be “Agents shall not discharge their firearms at or from a moving vehicle unless deadly physical force is being used against the police officer or another person present, by means other than a moving vehicle.” Training and policy changes should be implemented to implement this policy.

https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files ... Report.pdf

If your hero Renee Good was killed by an Illegal Alien your [[[JWO MSM SOURCES]]] would have kept that a secret from you.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 14 Jan 2026, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:51 am

If your 

Just the facts, Gunga...

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:39 am

Controlly,

Stop pretending you understand the issue.

Your job is to carry the water.

 

I understand that a lot of bad people have been picked up by ICE in a Sanctuary City/State.  And you would rather change the subject.  Like most threads you enter.  

Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:05 am

I understand that a lot of bad people 

All of whom could be processed WITHOUT invading Minneapolis and shooting women...

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 8:54 am

Just the facts, Gunga...

If your hero Renee Good was killed by an Illegal Alien your [[[JWO MSM SOURCES]]] would have kept that a secret from you.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 14 Jan 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:08 am

If your hero Renee Good 

Just the facts...

If you have a video of the carnage Good wreaked upon a group of armed men, please don't hesitate to post it.

You know your rules. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:06 am

All of whom could be processed WITHOUT invading Minneapolis and shooting women...

 

ICE wouldn't have to be there IF the state and cities would allow local LEOs to wok with ICE.  

A women would not have been shot if she did drive her car at an agent.

'Nuff said on that.

Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:14 am

ICE wouldn't have to be there

They don't have to be there...


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:10 am

Just the facts...

If you have a video of the carnage Good wreaked upon a group of armed men, please don't hesitate to post it.

You know your rules.

Another lie from you.
I never said she killed anybody.
Your rule is  to  LIE LIE LIE once you realize you can't support your failed belief system with facts. 
Good very easily could have killed the Agent  during her full throttle lunge at him from a distance of 3 feet away.
She lost her deadly game of "CHICKEN" 
Why don't YOU give it a try...?   
Go drive up to a cop who is on foot.
Pull up to within 3 feet of him dead ahead, then floor the gas pedal.
Then see what happens...!       

*GHETTOBLASTER » 14 Jan 2026, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:23 am

Another lie from you.
I never said she killed anybody.
 

Do you possess ANY awareness of self?

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:25 am

Do you possess ANY awareness of self?

Obviously you don't possess a dictionary.......  

carnage /kär′nĭj/
noun

1. Massive slaughter, as in war; a massacre.
2. Corpses, especially of those killed in battle.
3. Flesh of slain animals or men.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 14 Jan 2026, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:57 am

Obviously you don't possess a dictionary.......  

carnage /kär′nĭj/
noun

1. Massive slaughter, as in war; a massacre.
2. Corpses, especially of those killed in battle.
3. Flesh of slain animals or men.

WTF is wrong with you?

Do you recall your own demands for evidence? 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 10:01 am

WTF is wrong with you?

Do you recall your own demands for evidence?

FACTS:

1)  Democrats CREATED ILLEGAL "Sanctuary Cities" and are NOW using them to FIGHT Deportation efforts... which Donald Trump was given a MANDATE to do in 2024!

2)  Democrat "Rent a RIOT" protesters and their Billionaire Liberal organizers, are the ones CREATING the RIOTS across America... BUT, it WON'T STOP ICE, and it WON'T stop TRUMP !

3)  Current Status... close to 3 MILLION illegals have been REMOVED from America, not to mention 3 million Democrat votes for CORRUPTION and FRAUD !

4)  Trump to DE-FUND sanctuary cites effective Feb. 1, 2026...  GOOD LUCK Minneapolis !

5)  ICE is CONTINUING to do their jobs... TRUMP is CONTINUING to execute on his mandate... and the RADICAL Liberals can GO TO HELL !!
 

ConservativeWave » 14 Jan 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 10:10 am

JUST the TRUTH !!
 

 
 

ConservativeWave » 14 Jan 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 10:10 am

FACTS:

1)  Democrats CREATED 

you're an idiot.