We're done.Vegas » 12 Jan 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ LOL! No. *******, you haven't. If you are convinced that you have, then
To whom am I "defending"?
I ain't buyin' a pig in a poke from a welshing liar.Vegas » 12 Jan 2026, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ **** your questions. You don't answer mine, so I owe you nothing.
1. Siggghhhh...should I bother?
The umpire has to be a mod. Only a mod can do the banning. Do you think I am really going to trust your lying *** to keep your word?Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ I ain't buyin' a pig in a poke from a welshing liar.
Name the umpire....
It better not be some illiterate goat **** imbecile....
It has to be someone who understands what Survivorship Bias is.Vegas » 12 Jan 2026, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ The umpire has to be a mod. Only a mod can do the banning. Do you think I am really going to trust your lying *** to keep your word?
It's either Cannon or Deezer. That's that.
Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ It has to be someone who understands what Survivorship Bias is.
**** idiot.
It doesn't identify to whom I need to explain my answer.
The deal isn't about whether you answer it correctly or not. It is about whether or not you answered it all.Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ It doesn't identify to whom I need to explain my answer.
Accordingly, the possibility that it could be an innumerate livestock violating feta churner can't be eliminated...
That I've done...as you've acknowledged.Vegas » 12 Jan 2026, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ The deal isn't about whether you answer it correctly or not. It is about whether or not you answered it all.
Oh my God. You **** moron.
I don't need to "take a deal"..
Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to "take a deal"..
You've acknowledged it.
I do...
If I told you I'm not playing, why is it continuing?
Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ If I told you I'm not playing, why is it continuing?