HereHuey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ It was assumed. And there is no post of mine on this thread, or your notifications about from this thread, that says "Feet.....".

Deal:Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Not only a remarkably stupid thing to do, it was entirely unnecessary...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
The reason you are using a screen shot from your database is because over a hour that was corrected.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑HereHuey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ It was assumed. And there is no post of mine on this thread, or your notifications about from this thread, that says "Feet.....".
and take your blah, blah with you..
I just scrolled up.Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ The reason you are using a screen shot from your database is because over a hour that was corrected.
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑
I don't keep a "data base"
My recall is excellent.
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ I just scrolled up.
Strike 1.
I don't keep a "data base"
Strike 2
My recall is excellent.
Take a seat, meat.
1. Prove it.Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
1. Lie. You have a database on your computer labeled Vegas and Huey.
2. You can barely recall a conversation from 5 minutes ago.
No...that's **** idiotic.Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ If you had just scrolled up you would have used the reply function. DOn't be scairt.
1. It just takes logic to figure out that when you pull up the same quotes time and time again, that you clearly have them saved somewhere on your computer. DuhBlackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ 1. Prove it.
2. I remember you having to change your question about Survivorship bias because you had forgotten my actual definition.
Then having to do so again, because you and Syntax ate locked in mortal struggle.
Because you're an imbecile.
But it is not there. It was corrected at 0913,Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ No...that's **** idiotic.
I scrolled up to what I knew was there.
You lists of quotes you posted recently from threads that no longer exist proves it. Some are 8 years old.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ 1. Prove it.
2. I remember you having to change your question about Survivorship bias because you had forgotten my actual definition.
Then having to do so again, because you and Syntax are locked in mortal struggle.
Because you're an imbecile.
You just saw a photo of it, Brick.Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ But it is not there. It was corrected at 0913,
Have fun if this is what you are going to whine about.
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
The original from over an hour ago. GO use the reply feature, liar.
Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ The original from over an hour ago. GO use the reply feature, liar.
Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ The original from over an hour ago. GO use the reply feature, liar.
GO use the reply feature,
liar.
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ You just acknowledged it is the original, Brick
Post my lie.....in my words.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
No....that doesn't prove ****...Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ You lists of quotes you posted recently from threads that no longer exist proves it. Some are 8 years old.
I never said it wasn't. When you first brought it up I told you then it was edited. Wanna see?Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ You just acknowledged it is the original, Brick
Post my lie.....in my words.
Thanks for acknowledging you save quotes.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ No....that doesn't prove ****...
It means I have a collection of about a dozen of your greatest hits which, due to your promiscuity with respect to Stupid, is far from exhaustive....
I started keeping them because you not only run from your words, you lie about them....