Liberal Forum

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:07 am

I never said it wasn't.  

Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:01 am

What is he lying about now? This idiot couldn't be honest if his life depended on it.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:08 am

Then why are you bitching?

Where is my "lie"?

 

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:08 am

Thanks for acknowledging you save quotes.  



Game.  Set.  Match.

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:09 am

I 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:11 am

Keep it relevant.

We know they are your words.

We no longer care why you lied about it.

But I DO want to see this "lie" which you attribute to me.....

This is why we keep an archive....

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:11 am

Keep it relevant.

We know they are your words.

We no longer care why you lied about it.

But I DO want to see this "lie" which you attribute to me.....


This is why we keep an archive....

 

 

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 9:53 am

@Blackvegetable    that was corrected 30 minutes ago.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:09 am

The question was about TWO "data bases", Reframy

 

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:19 am

Chances are if you have one you keep multiple.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:23 am

Trump muses about a really bad — and evidently illegal — idea to bomb Russia using Chinese flags

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... ese-flags/

As Russia was ramping up its invasion of Ukraine, former president Donald Trump chose the moment to hail President Vladimir Putin’s moves as “savvy” and “genius.” Now the military strategist former president has weighed in with his own idea for what the United States could do next. And it’s … something.

At a speech in New Orleans on Saturday night, Trump mused that we could simply apply Chinese flags to our F-22s and then “bomb the s--t out of Russia,” setting off a conflict between those two countries.

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

Stop lying.

Youre fried,.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:26 am

That would require actually posting MY lie...

I understand this is not something you are likely to intuit, but this is not the first time you've been corrected,

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:24 am

But I don't even have the one.....

**** idiot......

 

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:33 am

You have already admitted it.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:34 am

Post that "admission".

In my words. 
 

 

Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:36 am

It means I have a collection of about a dozen of your greatest hits which, due to your promiscuity with respect to Stupid, is far from exhaustive....

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 11:44 am

I don't see any mention of "data base"...

I guess you lied again...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...