Liberal Forum

Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 9:09 pm

Are you at least happy for the people of Venezuela? They seem jubilant.

You need to research more about the Greenland issue. You are only looking at the surface.

you keep saying that

https://youtu.be/POJhHiSKg8E?si=XdNB1WA53V8ItvJI



https://youtube.com/shorts/GnVD958Xifs? ... rrDZPdE9_r


and the surface of the Greenland situation is all that is required 

we can put all the military bases we want there … they don’t care

what we don’t need to do is invade it and take over to do it 

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 9:34 am

you keep saying that

https://youtu.be/POJhHiSKg8E?si=XdNB1WA53V8ItvJI

https://youtube.com/shorts/GnVD958Xifs? ... rrDZPdE9_r

and the surface of the Greenland situation is all that is required 

we can put all the military bases we want there … they don’t care

what we don’t need to do is invade it and take over to do it

Come on. How dishonest is this? You pull a handful of people out of the millions that are celebrating. That's a pretty sleazy move. 


No, it's not. It's surface level thinking that is dangerous. Research.

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 10:14 am

Come on. How dishonest is this? You pull a handful of people out of the millions that are celebrating. That's a pretty sleazy move. 

No, it's not. It's surface level thinking that is dangerous. Research.

how about from the VP of Venezuela?


https://youtu.be/apseHD6BsCs?si=ah0PxqJtLjrd--uy


https://youtu.be/g4mvYbu1p6Y?si=2KIAyDGvN42XkBuw


your research stops at the cuck level when it comes to Greenland 


 

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 11:29 am

how about from the VP of Venezuela?

https://youtu.be/apseHD6BsCs?si=ah0PxqJtLjrd--uy

https://youtu.be/g4mvYbu1p6Y?si=2KIAyDGvN42XkBuw

your research stops at the cuck level when it comes to Greenland

I care about the people. Their leaders are the ones who started all that **** to begin with. The people, overall, are jubilant. You try enduring what they endured for over two decades. 

Wow. You really stuck me there. Yeah, I know. Researching is evil. 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 11:38 am

I care about the people. Their leaders are the ones who started all that **** to begin with. The people, overall, are jubilant. You try enduring what they endured for over two decades. 

Wow. You really stuck me there. Yeah, I know. Researching is evil.

Cuck researching is easy

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:27 pm

Cuck researching is easy

Nothing is stopping you from researching. 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:29 pm

Nothing is stopping you from researching.

Q . will greenland let us put up a defense system

AI Overview

+7Greenland, as part of the Kingdom of Denmark, already hosts U.S. military bases under a 1951 defense agreement, allowing for U.S. military activities, but Greenlanders and Denmark oppose U.S. sovereignty or major control, with Denmark increasing its own Arctic defense while Greenlanders fear loss of autonomy and resources despite the U.S. push for a "Golden Dome" missile defense system on the island for strategic reasons
. 
Current Situation & Agreements

• 1951 Defense Agreement: This treaty grants the U.S. legal rights to operate military bases, like the Pituffik Space Base, in Greenland, which is governed by Denmark.
• U.S. Strategic Interest: The U.S. views Greenland as crucial for Arctic defense, missile interception (Golden Dome), and countering Russian/Chinese influence, as noted by President Trump's recent demands for U.S. control.
• Danish Position: Denmark, while acknowledging U.S. security needs and agreeing to expand cooperation, refuses to sell or cede control, viewing it as a sovereign part of the Kingdom. 

Greenland's Stance & Public Opinion

• Not For Sale: Greenland's leaders and people firmly state the island is not for sale, emphasizing self-determination.
• Resource Concerns: Some Greenlanders believe the push for control is driven by untapped natural resources, not just security.
• Fear of Losing Autonomy: There are fears that U.S. control would erode Greenland's autonomy and benefits from being part of Denmark (healthcare, education). 

Increased Military Activity 

• Joint Efforts: In response to geopolitical tensions, Denmark and Greenland are increasing their defense presence and military exercises in the Arctic in coordination with NATO, as highlighted in recent high-level meetings. 

In Summary: While the U.S. has existing rights for military bases and seeks more control for defense, Greenland and Denmark are resisting U.S. sovereignty, preferring increased NATO cooperation and their own enhanced Arctic defense capabilities. 

 
 

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm

Q . will greenland let us put up a defense system

AI Overview

+7Greenland, as part of the Kingdom of Denmark, already hosts U.S. military bases under a 1951 defense agreement, allowing for U.S. military activities, but Greenlanders and Denmark oppose U.S. sovereignty or major control, with Denmark increasing its own Arctic defense while Greenlanders fear loss of autonomy and resources despite the U.S. push for a "Golden Dome" missile defense system on the island for strategic reasons
. 
Current Situation & Agreements

• 1951 Defense Agreement: This treaty grants the U.S. legal rights to operate military bases, like the Pituffik Space Base, in Greenland, which is governed by Denmark.
• U.S. Strategic Interest: The U.S. views Greenland as crucial for Arctic defense, missile interception (Golden Dome), and countering Russian/Chinese influence, as noted by President Trump's recent demands for U.S. control.
• Danish Position: Denmark, while acknowledging U.S. security needs and agreeing to expand cooperation, refuses to sell or cede control, viewing it as a sovereign part of the Kingdom. 

Greenland's Stance & Public Opinion

• Not For Sale: Greenland's leaders and people firmly state the island is not for sale, emphasizing self-determination.
• Resource Concerns: Some Greenlanders believe the push for control is driven by untapped natural resources, not just security.
• Fear of Losing Autonomy: There are fears that U.S. control would erode Greenland's autonomy and benefits from being part of Denmark (healthcare, education). 

Increased Military Activity 

• Joint Efforts: In response to geopolitical tensions, Denmark and Greenland are increasing their defense presence and military exercises in the Arctic in coordination with NATO, as highlighted in recent high-level meetings. 

In Summary: While the U.S. has existing rights for military bases and seeks more control for defense, Greenland and Denmark are resisting U.S. sovereignty, preferring increased NATO cooperation and their own enhanced Arctic defense capabilities.

minerals are trump's objective in greenland.

jerrab » 14 Jan 2026, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:41 pm

minerals are trump's objective in greenland.

doing what the MIC says is his objective 

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm

Q . will greenland let us put up a defense system

AI Overview

+7Greenland, as part of the Kingdom of Denmark, already hosts U.S. military bases under a 1951 defense agreement, allowing for U.S. military activities, but Greenlanders and Denmark oppose U.S. sovereignty or major control, with Denmark increasing its own Arctic defense while Greenlanders fear loss of autonomy and resources despite the U.S. push for a "Golden Dome" missile defense system on the island for strategic reasons
. 
Current Situation & Agreements

• 1951 Defense Agreement: This treaty grants the U.S. legal rights to operate military bases, like the Pituffik Space Base, in Greenland, which is governed by Denmark.
• U.S. Strategic Interest: The U.S. views Greenland as crucial for Arctic defense, missile interception (Golden Dome), and countering Russian/Chinese influence, as noted by President Trump's recent demands for U.S. control.
• Danish Position: Denmark, while acknowledging U.S. security needs and agreeing to expand cooperation, refuses to sell or cede control, viewing it as a sovereign part of the Kingdom. 

Greenland's Stance & Public Opinion

• Not For Sale: Greenland's leaders and people firmly state the island is not for sale, emphasizing self-determination.
• Resource Concerns: Some Greenlanders believe the push for control is driven by untapped natural resources, not just security.
• Fear of Losing Autonomy: There are fears that U.S. control would erode Greenland's autonomy and benefits from being part of Denmark (healthcare, education). 

Increased Military Activity 

• Joint Efforts: In response to geopolitical tensions, Denmark and Greenland are increasing their defense presence and military exercises in the Arctic in coordination with NATO, as highlighted in recent high-level meetings. 

In Summary: While the U.S. has existing rights for military bases and seeks more control for defense, Greenland and Denmark are resisting U.S. sovereignty, preferring increased NATO cooperation and their own enhanced Arctic defense capabilities.

Well that is a start. But I don't know if your prompt is all that relatable. We already know that Denmark doesn't want us there. That is nothing new. 

The question is why does Trump think it is a national security risk for the US if Russia or China get Greenland?
 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:50 pm

The question is why does Trump think it is a national security risk for the US if Russia or China get Greenland?

Would you want rKelly living in your neighborhood....asking for rides, borrowing your stuff, and hanging his laundry on your fence?
 

RebelGator » 14 Jan 2026, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 1:04 pm

Would you want rKelly living in your neighborhood....asking for rides, borrowing your stuff, and hanging his laundry on your fence?

Sometimes he is spot on, then sometimes he is out of his mind. Like now.

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 12:50 pm

Well that is a start. But I don't know if your prompt is all that relatable. We already know that Denmark doesn't want us there. That is nothing new. 

The question is why does Trump think it is a national security risk for the US if Russia or China get Greenland?

  you just won’t quit

how is it a security risk if Greenland lets us put our new iron dome there?

Do we really have to take the country over?

even though we have their permission?

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:40 pm

  you just won’t quit

how is it a security risk if Greenland lets us put our new iron dome there?

Do we really have to take the country over?

even though we have their permission?

Do your own research. I did. Then get back to me.

This time, do some real research.

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 1:07 pm

Sometimes he is spot on, then sometimes he is out of his mind. Like now.

how am I out of my mind?

because I do want to see our government taking over sovereign countries?

we’re  done

you are too ignorant to talk to

 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:41 pm

Do your own research. I did. Then get back to me.

This time, do some real research.

  ignorant 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:41 pm

Do your own research. I did. Then get back to me.

This time, do some real research.

I got back to you and you ran like a bitch

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:42 pm

how am I out of my mind?

because I do want to see our government taking over sovereign countries?

we’re  done

you are too ignorant to talk to

You are out of your mind because you are abandoning your humanity. You do know that it is possible to hate Trump, disagree with capturing Maduro, and still be happy for the Venezuelan people, right? 

There is no contradiction there. 

All you need to do is say you disagree with how Trump handled this, but at least something good came from it. What is wrong with that?

Mrkelly » 14 Jan 2026, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:44 pm

I got back to you and you ran like a bitch

Nope. You want me to do your work for you. **** that noise. 

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:45 pm

You are out of your mind because you are abandoning your humanity. You do know that it is possible to hate Trump, disagree with capturing Maduro, and still be happy for the Venezuelan people, right? 

There is no contradiction there. 

All you need to do is say you disagree with how Trump handled this, but at least something good came from it. What is wrong with that?

Because it would be a **** lie