No.....no way.
I really enjoyed that video.
Just relax, and watch the video.
That's CohEn, you **** imbecile.Beekeeper » 28 Jan 2026, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ Funny how you mention Cohn.
NOW he is crawling back CLAIMING
I don't think you understand "incentive"
Do you really want some attention from me.....you know what happens, Shorty.
I just want you two to hook up...
And the winner is......
You don't accept everyone understands your incentive to sustain doubt. Your intellectual soul depends on everyone ignoring why they exist in plain sight equally positioned living here now.
You have Free Will...make it about someone else
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jan 2026, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ I taunt, your unfailing sense of inadequacy takes care of the rest.