I repeatedly watched COPS. What is the first action they take before they "get on it"? They ensure that the vehicle is "OFF". No individual should have been walking in front of that vehicle for ANY reason. The officer positioned himself there either to create a justification for being bumped or he did not receive adequate training or even failed training. Officers are instructed to avoid standing or pass into the path of a vehicle that is not "PARKED" and "SHUT OFF".
Not "to", "for"..BuckNaked » 15 Jan 2026, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ They needed a trick, a mnemonic device.
it says it right there “they”
No....I support my stand with citations, you just rebleat your slogans...Huey » 15 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah. Plenty of copy and pastes and questions but nothing that debunks the fact his hospital visit PROVES she did hit him with the vehicle. Despite claims of the left.
This thread is not about whether he should have been in front of the car. This thread is about the hoax from the left that she did not hit him with the car.Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2026, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ No....I support my stand with citations, you just rebleat your slogans...
That's nice. SHe still hit. That hoax is done.*Roshambo » 15 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I repeatedly watched COPS. What is the first action they take before they "get on it"? They ensure that the vehicle is "OFF". No individual should have been walking in front of that vehicle for ANY reason. The officer positioned himself there either to create a justification for being bumped or he did not receive adequate training or even failed training. Officers are instructed to avoid standing or pass into the path of a vehicle that is not "PARKED" and "SHUT OFF".
Noem will be impeached soon. Someone will get to the bottom of this.
Controlly,
Nope. IT is about what is in the title and the OP. The only propaganda was when you side claimed he did not hit her with a car.Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Controlly,
No one needs your help.
This is about recatapulting the propaganda...and you're the toady for that job.
Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2026, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Not "to", "for"..
Don't try "clever" , remember your lane..
How many illegals do you employ? And I never, ever see you offer a different solution.Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not satisfied that you can read....
Inside Trump’s circle, the power of illegal immigration to manipulate popular sentiment was readily apparent, and his advisers brainstormed methods for keeping their attention-addled boss on message. They needed a trick, a mnemonic device.
For whom was the mnemonic device deemed necessary and why?
We have just established AGAIN that you can't read.
Wasn't talking to you.
Adolph Controlly, please..
Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2026, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ We have just established AGAIN that you can't read.
Demonstrate that you can then get back to me.
It's wrong.
:rofl:Huey » 15 Jan 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not attempting to hijack a thread.
I am glad you agree that the hoax the she didn't hit the agent with her car has been proved wrong.
Since you were able to brings facts and citations to the contrary o n that subject.
Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2026, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
You're attempting to control it.
Because it is getting away from you.
Well I always provide an answer unlike some people. Why don’t you give us the answer
No, you aren't.
You provided the wrong one.BuckNaked » 15 Jan 2026, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Well I always provide an answer unlike some people. Why don’t you give us the answer