Did you know that he had driven his car around hers and approached from in front?Huey » 20 Jan 2026, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I remember that when it first came out. It was used by WAPO. They leave the one important pic of him standing in front of the car.
https://archive.ph/Qtnp6
This is the image WAPO left out:
Now you know why I cancelled my subscription.
Huey » 20 Jan 2026, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Of, my bad. I am glad you agree that WAPO left out the pic of the agent standing in front of the car. You could always take a stand.
Nobody alive is this g'ddammned stupidNow you know why I cancelled my subscription.
https://youtu.be/SS6SAb-__HEBlackvegetable » 20 Jan 2026, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you know that he had driven his car around hers and approached from in front?
Don't bitch about "editing" when you disregard the post to which you respond.Huey » 20 Jan 2026, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/SS6SAb-__HE
Starting at the ten second mark.
That is not relevant to where he was standing when she pulled over. I don't disregard. The moment you take a stand on where he was standing when she started moving the car we will get to your diversion.Blackvegetable » 20 Jan 2026, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't bitch about "editing" when you disregard the post to which you respond.
What you consider relevant is not relevant.
If you are not man enough to take a stand on where he was standing when she moved the vehicle than your diversions are not relecant.
@Blackvegetable when she starts to move the vehicle it is quite clear he standing in front of her. Also kind a difficult to put two rounds into her that went thru the windshield if he wasn't in front of her.Huey » 20 Jan 2026, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I remember that when it first came out. It was used by WAPO. They leave the one important pic of him standing in front of the car.
https://archive.ph/Qtnp6
This is the image WAPO left out:
Now you know why I cancelled my subscription.
You were asked to take a stand on whether or not he drove around her vehicle.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jan 2026, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You were asked to take a stand on whether or not he drove around her vehicle.
I'm still waiting.
BuckNaked » 20 Jan 2026, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Note to self follow verbal commands from law enforcement officials


So you show a picture without a law man in it.....you really are stupid.
I wouldn't get out of my car for a masked person. I would shoot them in the head if I felt threatened.PhiloBeddo » 20 Jan 2026, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ She was asked to get out of the car, and she chose to hit the gas. WTF.
You're a **** moron, the bitch knew who was giving the orders, she tried to subvert their efforts to enforce the law all day long. As a fist class peckerhead, you should always feel threatened....as far as shooting someone, ambush or in the back is the preferred method for you leftist scum*Roshambo » 20 Jan 2026, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't get out of my car for a masked person. I would shoot them in the head if I felt threatened.