Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 10:41 am

It proves nothing.

A week ago it was an Article of Faith which you insisted must be acknowledged. 

You claim the salient fact is "irrelevant"...

He wasn't supposed to be in front of it.

He was and the bitch tried running over him... she got what she deserved

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 10:41 am

It proves nothing.


A week ago it was an Article of Faith which you insisted must be acknowledged. 

You claim the salient fact is "irrelevant"...

He wasn't supposed to be in front of it.

 

It proves that the first shot was from the FRONT of the car, whether he was supposed to be there or not.  

Nod.

PS.  She was supposed be out of the car.  ANd he wouldn't have been there at all.  You progs leave that part out as well.

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 10:44 am

It proves that the first shot 

No it doesn't...

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 10:46 am

No it doesn't...

 

I see you haven't taken that stand yet.  Despite video, still pics, eye witness accounts, and shot placement.  

I guess you are a magic bullet guy.  

What you deleted:

It proves that the first shot was from the FRONT of the car, whether he was supposed to be there or not.  

Nod.

PS.  She was supposed be out of the car.  ANd he wouldn't have been there at all.  You progs leave that part out as well.
 

FJB » 21 Jan 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 10:43 am

He was and the bitch tried running over him... she got what she deserved

 

Just have fun with him.  He refuses to take a stand on posting where the agent was standing.  

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 11:10 am

I see you haven't taken that stand yet.  Despite video,

I have taken a stand.

One that is consistent with RELEVANT observable facts....

Those facts add up to this being the result of Ross REPEATEDLY ignoring procedure.

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.

There isn't a single piece of evidence conclusively supporting the propaganda you've been spewing since it happened. 

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

I have taken a stand.

One that is consistent with RELEVANT observable facts....

Those facts add up to this being the result of Ross REPEATEDLY ignoring procedure.

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.

There isn't a single piece of evidence conclusively supporting the propaganda you've been spewing since it happened. 

 

 

About **** time.  I haven't spread any propaganda.

As a matter of fact I stayed away from your diversion  Waiting for you to take a stand.  When you realized that the pic you posted was misleading you ran from it.

Regardless of whether or not he followed procedure is not relevant.  Below are the facts you will delete and run like a coward from:

1.  She was following and impeding Federal Agents.

2.  She was blocking the right of way.  After he drove around her she moved forward.

3.  When she didn't move the vehicle she was ordered to get out of the vehicle.  Is she had done that she would not be dead.

4.  She put the car in drive and moved forward.  If she did not do that, at worst, she would have ben physically removed from the car.

The moral of the story is when federal agents tell you to get out of the car you get out of the **** car.  You don't pull forward and strike an agent.  

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 11:42 am

About **** time. 

 

It's been my "stand" from the start.

I have no interest in your recap.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

I have taken a stand.

One that is consistent with RELEVANT observable facts....

Those facts add up to this being the result of Ross REPEATEDLY ignoring procedure.

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.

There isn't a single piece of evidence conclusively supporting the propaganda you've been spewing since it happened.

they are not facts you **** retard... that is the **** liberal side of things that happen...

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 11:51 am

It's been my "stand" from the start.

I have no interest in your recap.

 

Nothing in my post was propaganda;


About **** time.  I haven't spread any propaganda.

As a matter of fact I stayed away from your diversion  Waiting for you to take a stand.  When you realized that the pic you posted was misleading you ran from it.

Regardless of whether or not he followed procedure is not relevant.  Below are the facts you will delete and run like a coward from:

1.  She was following and impeding Federal Agents.

2.  She was blocking the right of way.  After he drove around her she moved forward.

3.  When she didn't move the vehicle she was ordered to get out of the vehicle.  Is she had done that she would not be dead.

4.  She put the car in drive and moved forward.  If she did not do that, at worst, she would have ben physically removed from the car.

The moral of the story is when federal agents tell you to get out of the car you get out of the **** car.  You don't pull forward and strike an agent.  

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm

Nothing in my post was propaganda;


 

You wouldn't know it if it **** you.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm

You wouldn't know it if it **** you.

 

You are like the little kid that stomps his feet and whines "because I said so..."

By all means point out the propaganda in this:

I have taken a stand.

One that is consistent with RELEVANT observable facts....

Those facts add up to this being the result of Ross REPEATEDLY ignoring procedure.

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.  She also moved the car forward before he got to it.

There isn't a single piece of evidence conclusively supporting the propaganda you've been spewing since it happened. 

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm

You are like 

Did Ross drive his vehicle AROUND Good's?

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 1:04 pm

Did Ross drive his vehicle AROUND Good's?

 

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.  She also moved the car forward before he got to it.

Stop deleting my quotes and **** read them before asking stupid questions that were answered before you asked.

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 1:11 pm

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.  She also moved the car forward before he got to it.

Stop deleting my quotes and **** read them before asking stupid questions that were answered before you asked.

He placed himself in front of the vehicle

So you agree he violated procedure and responded with callous indifference to public safety.


My work is done.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 1:16 pm

So you agree he violated procedure and responded with callous indifference to public safety.


My work is done.

 

No it's not.  I posted no propaganda.  This is why people don't laugh at you.  You never touched the basic argument.  You ran with this bullsht, something I was not arguing.

Are you going to answer questions or not?  The other day I told another poster what you do is ask questions, usually diversions, declare yourself the winner and then run from backing up yours.

Where did I post propaganda?  

Blackvegetable » 20 Jan 2026, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2026, 12:32 pm

 

I am glad you agree  YOU posted propaganda.
 

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 1:24 pm

I am glad you agree  YOU posted propaganda.

No Rheumy Eyes!

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 1:38 pm

No Rheumy Eyes!

 

Those those time sequenced pics, published in WAPO, intentionally leave out the pic of him standing in front of the car to plant the seed of propaganda that he shot first from the side. That is why you diverted.

Now, still waiting for you post were I posted propaganda.  

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.  She also moved the car forward before he got to it.

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 2:04 pm

Those those time sequenced pics, published in WAPO, intentionally leave out the pic of him standing in front of the car to plant the seed of propaganda that he shot first from the side. That is why you diverted.

Now, still waiting for you post were I posted propaganda.  

He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it.  She also moved the car forward before he got to it.

Did he mutter "**** Bitch" as his body cam recorded as the dead foot accelerated the vehicle away from him?  Is that not chilling to you in anyway?  
 You can't bite *** without bias Huey.