She **** around and found outBlackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ So you agree he violated procedure and responded with callous indifference to public safety.
My work is done.
I would say the same thing if I just got hit by a car. Remember, she would be alive today if she did what most people I know would do when told by law enforcement to get out of the car.JohnnyYou » 21 Jan 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Did he mutter "**** Bitch" as his body cam recorded as the dead foot accelerated the vehicle away from him? Is that not chilling to you in anyway?
You can't bite *** without bias Huey.
:rofl:Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Those those time sequenced pics, published in WAPO, intentionally leave out the pic
Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I would say the same thing if I just got hit by a car. Remember, she would be alive today if she did what most people I know would do when told by law enforcement to get out of the car.
Get out of the **** car.
So did Charlie Kirk
Youthink it is funny YOU posted propaganda? You were not smart enough to figure it out. By the way, still waiting for you to post that propaganda you claimed I posted. You got busted and diverted.Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Those those time sequenced pics, published in WAPO, intentionally leave out the pic of him standing in front of the car to plant the seed of propaganda that he shot first from the side. That is why you diverted.
Now, still waiting for you post were I posted propaganda.
He placed himself in front of the vehicle AFTER driving around it. She also moved the car forward before he got to it.
You got one moron blaming the agent for being in front of the car.Vegas » 21 Jan 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly. These people think they are above the law. They genuinely believe that compliance to the law is below them.
don't hesitate to eat feces.
Yeah.. true..agreed. I would end this story as fast as you can. If it ever gets proper scrutiny in an investigation I don't think you would like the outcome.Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I would say the same thing if I just got hit by a car. Remember, she would be alive today if she did what most people I know would do when told by law enforcement to get out of the car.
Get out of the **** car.
When the reporters argued in return that this was not clear from the video recorded at the scene, Trump replied: “I’ll play the tape for you right now.”Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, was hospitalized after she clipped him with car: DHS The immigration officer who fatally shot Minneapolis anti-ICE protester Renee Nicole Good suffered internal bleeding after being clipped in the harrowing encounter, a Department of Homeland Security official told The Post. Veteran ICE agent Jonathan Ross suffered the bleeding to his torso, the DHS official said. The DHS official did not elaborate on how severe the internal bleeding was, but Ross was hospitalized after the incident and released later that day. https://nypost.com/2026/01/14/us-news/i ... h-car-dhs/ No, she didn't hit him.
What ever point you are making is kinda hazy.Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ When the reporters argued in return that this was not clear from the video recorded at the scene, Trump replied: “I’ll play the tape for you right now.”
He ordered aide Natalie Harpe to run the video. As the slow-motion footage played on a laptop beside the Resolute Desk, the reporters noted, again, that the video did not clearly show an officer being run over.
“Well… I – the way I look at it…” he said while watching.
At the end of the clip, Trump said: “It’s a terrible scene. I think it’s horrible to watch. No, I hate to see it.”
Pressed on what he’d just seen, the reporters said that Trump pivoted to attack the immigration policies of his predecessors.
Trump Adamantly Defends ICE Shooting — Then Sidesteps After He Watches Video With NYT Reporters
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/tru ... 35487.html
Why is that my problem
What ever point you are making is kinda hazyHuey » 23 Jan 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Then don't reply to my post with that weak garbage.
You have already admitted he was struck. So that means you are getting all anal about the wording "run over. "
That is actually spot on. My stand is since you have already admitted he was struck you are whing about the wording Trump used to describe it.
But you did the same on the last thread that you abandoned, in shame.Huey » 23 Jan 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That is actually spot on. My stand is since you have already admitted he was struck you are whing about the wording Trump used to describe it.
No haze in that, Standless Wonder.
Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2026, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ But you did the same on the last thread that you abandoned, in shame.
And AI stripped the bark off that ****
Huey » 23 Jan 2026, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't know which thread you are talking about. Provide a link so we can discuss. Your narratives and recall are suspect.
Don't know which thread you are talking about. Provide a link
Your narratives and recall are suspect.
viewtopic.php?p=2845130#p2845130Huey » 23 Jan 2026, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't know which thread you are talking about. Provide a link so we can discuss. Your narratives and recall are suspect.