Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:17 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:04 am

Don't know what that **** is 

The @*MankyLittleSkidmark Rule of Incidental Reply.

In your own words

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=99332

 

 

Keep running, Running Man.  PS.  That premise was debunked.

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:04 am

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 6:55 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 6:51 am

The rule was posted

No...it wasn't...


But here


It's at the link.

digest.php?u=1971



Your rule.


 

Don't know what that **** is Running Man but here is your rule in your own words.  Run, Too Far, Run.

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 6:47 am

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 6:43 am

First, the rule...



 

sure

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:57 pm

I don't run from questions or my own words.

You do.


Victory is earned, not asserted....and never by a sniveling, issue riddled, little skidmark
 



 

I don't run from questions or my own words.

Your rule in your own words.  As a man would post it, in full, with a link.

You a=don't know much about being a man.  That is why you are alone.
 


 

 

 

 

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:21 am

Keep running, 

No...


You've been asked to post the rule. This is to ensure that you won't insist on playing by another.

You know how you are.

We all do.

 

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:20 am

Which one?  But ifiti s survivorship bias I answered that a long time ago using the bomber example.  . Don't be like your hero BV and demand I repost itl.

LOL, entrapment by baffeled with bullshyt..     BV is a fantastic circle jerk dancer and he yanks his chain on ya'll all day long.

This place is a Black Vegetable Centric Unverse.  It even atracts wet MAGAnutz!
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:26 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:21 am

Keep running, 

No...


You've been asked to post the rule. This is to ensure that you won't insist on playing by another.

You know how you are.

We all do.

 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:57 pm

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm

For once, your cowardice is the better part of valor.

I don't run from questions or my own words.

You do.


Victory is earned, not asserted....and never by a sniveling, issue riddled, little skidmark
 

 

The rule, in your own words:

I don't run from questions or my own words.

Run Coward, run.

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?

Too Far, you are a liar.
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm

Do you all wonder why I keep asking @Blackvegetable  that multiple choice question? 

You ever recognize allies among people that agree to disagree about everything really evolving in plain sight daily adapting to space one at a time, here now? Economics rule of 72 and zero sum gain results is a balance point regardless geographical position inhabiting space now.

The Real Universal Equilibrium is this moment past equals future as a whole total sum of everything present in current events going forward now. Balanced outcomes going forward now. I dis[proved the narrative now isn't eternity by describing life limited to series parallel time displaced conceived to decomposed materialized after periodic elements combined erode into organic life in fixed universal locations like this atmosphere isolated and insulated from the rest of the universe here. I account for both periodic elements of combined atoms charted on the chemical characteristics of this planet, in this solar system, in this galaxy, and how every ancestor regardless species, nature, body type of each ancestor lived so far, extinct or still reproducting next generation gaps here.

Which is the lesser of 2 evils? Defying facts humanity creates 7 better economic opportunities tomorrow or denying what one has been since conception living cradle to grave proportionately alive as an ever changing total sum of existed since a conceived into a specific ancestral lineage and generation gap individually present changing form from infant, toddler, adolescent, puberty, adult, maybe biological parent, maybe grandparent, maybe great grandparent maybe a great great grandparent?

Potential of what could be since moment conceived into a series parallel evolving universe details never duplicate and results are never same form as origin.

Chromosomes define the individual, DNA describes the lineage, the numbers represent the species intellectually defined by syllables in conversations between individual brains navigating time living eternally separated now.

You don't offer anything more than eggplant does defying how evolving actually happens. Action and reaction are equal in a perpetual balancing forward situation life does now as current events change everything existed so far as a whole universe kinetically changing forms shaped as displaced universally positioned in plain sight.

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am

The rule, in your own words:

Run Coward, run.



 

is it a Rule or an Example? 

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am

The rule, in your own words:

Run Coward, run.

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?

Too Far, you are a liar.

I don't run from questions or my own words.

I've answered.


It cannot be YOUR rule....as a rule you always run from questions and your own words.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:39 am

is it a Rule or an Example? 

It is an example of how you try to rule a conversation or moderate a debate between other all sides played against a center balance point. How many sides exist if you follow the philosophy of thinking outside self contained to your own skin? currently 8.3 billion soles adapting here one at a time separated by chromosomes, DNA streaming, generation gaps, ancestral lineages, species, location adapting in plain sight now.

That is what these two origami figures show in symbolism over substance of human behavior throughout history recorded human behavior every generation gap since dawn of civilization in this atmosphere.
.

The philosophy of thinking outside a box and the event horizons between 4 grandparents, 2 parents, each son, daughter, grandchild becoming a 3 generation gap since inception of ancestral lineages left alive daily here.

Time measures results and context describes details existed into current events. The future unfolds from the past results changing form shaped ancestrally displaced here, one ancestor at a time evolving as eternally separated currently alive.

Self evident true positions anything else is pure speculation life isn't naturally eternally separated so far.

Every reality estimates tomorrow economically 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year, every generation gap lived last 7,000 years.

Johnny » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 4:36 pm

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:20 am

Which one?  But ifiti s survivorship bias I answered that a long time ago using the bomber example.  . Don't be like your hero BV and demand I repost itl.

LOL, entrapment by baffeled with bullshyt..     BV is a fantastic circle jerk dancer and he yanks his chain on ya'll all day long.

This place is a Black Vegetable Centric Unverse.  It even atracts wet MAGAnutz!
 
 
 

 

BV is here because of me.  DOn't ever forget it.  Maybe I'll tell you the story if you ever come down here for that beer.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:39 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am

The rule, in your own words:

Run Coward, run.




 

is it a Rule or an Example? 

 

You have your own words and an example.  Acknowledge you were answered, Running Man.  

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:41 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:32 am

The rule, in your own words:

Run Coward, run.

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?

Too Far, you are a liar.

I don't run from questions or my own words.

I've answered.


It cannot be YOUR rule....as a rule you always run from questions and your own words.

 

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?

I can't seem to find the answer to either question. It is your turn to answer.  

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:43 am

You have your own words and an example.  Acknowledge you were answered, Running Man.

But this isn't about that.

It is about your rule regarding repetition.

I've answered @Vegas  question....he's acknowledged it.

You're demanding that I  either repeat it, or post the link....if I don't, you assert that I'm "running".

What's the rule?
 

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:44 am

I can't seem to find the answer to either question. It is your turn to answer.

Focus...


No diverting lies...

Let's get this resolved. 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:49 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:43 am

You have your own words and an example.  Acknowledge you were answered, Running Man.

But this isn't about that.

It is about your rule regarding repetition.

I've answered @Vegas  question....he's acknowledged it.

You're demanding that I  either repeat it, or post the link....if I don't, you assert that I'm "running".

What's the rule?
 

 

I don't give a rat's *** about you and the *** kicking Vegas gives you.  This is about your words. Have not seen a yes or no answer to the following:

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?  

Keep running, ******.  GO ahead and embarrass me, ******,


 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:52 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:44 am

I can't seem to find the answer to either question. It is your turn to answer.

Focus...

No diverting lies...

Let's get this resolved.

The only resolution is you repost the yes or no answer to this question"

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?

You post the link to it and I will take a week off.
 
 

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:42 am

BV is here because of me.  DOn't ever forget it.  Maybe I'll tell you the story if you ever come down here for that beer.

BV's brain doesn't choose to ignore actual time alive like you did with a separate ideology doing the same **** you do? Speculate what else is possible 24/7.

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:54 am

I don't give a rat's *** about you and the *** kicking Vegas gives you.  This is about your words. Have not seen a yes or no answer to the following:


 

You've never seen @Vegas  , or anyone else for that matter, kick my ***.

What you insist you see, or don't see, is irrelevant...we've established this, repeatedly.

Furthermore, Controlly, you are demanding the response be limited to 2 options.

That's yet another rule you assert, only to violate..

Then there's the "thread discipline" thing, of course..

So let's get back to it, shall we?


 

*31st » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 4:36 pm

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:42 am

BV is here because of me.  DOn't ever forget it.  Maybe I'll tell you the story if you ever come down here for that beer.

 

BV's brain doesn't choose to ignore actual time alive like you did with a separate ideology doing the same **** you do? Speculate what else is possible 24/7.

 

24/7?  Bv aves over a 100 posts a day.  Me?  Between 20 and 40.  During the week mostly on the low side.  BV posts from 6 am into the night.  I am done around 4 pm.

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:55 am

The only resolution is you repost the yes or no answer to this question"


 

That's neither focus nor thread discipline..

And I don't have to repeat.

Your rule.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 8:02 am

Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2026, 7:54 am

I don't give a rat's *** about you and the *** kicking Vegas gives you.  This is about your words. Have not seen a yes or no answer to the following:



 

You've never seen @Vegas  , or anyone else for that matter, kick my ***.

What you insist you see, or don't see, is irrelevant...we've established this, repeatedly.

Furthermore, Controlly, you are demanding the response be limited to 2 options.

That's yet another rule you assert, only to violate..

Then there's the "thread discipline" thing, of course..

So let's get back to it, shall we?


 

 

I don't give a **** about that.  I take it you lied and have not given a yes or no answer to the questions put to you.  Or you would have posted it and I would not be making this post.

Can a man, (a person born a biological male) get pregnant?  Or get an abortion?