Nobody has to kick your physical *** to debunk your social narrative to whom you believe you became after birth is a higher plane of evolution since conceived.Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ You've never seen @Vegas , or anyone else for that matter, kick my ***.
What you insist you see, or don't see, is irrelevant...we've established this, repeatedly.
Furthermore, Controlly, you are demanding the response be limited to 2 options.
That's yet another rule you assert, only to violate..
Then there's the "thread discipline" thing, of course..
So let's get back to it, shall we?
Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑That's neither focus nor thread discipline..Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ The only resolution is you repost the yes or no answer to this question"
And I don't have to repeat.
Your rule.
I don't give a **** about what you do, or do not, give a **** about.
Allow me to demonstrate why that is false...Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ Since you refuse to repost the answer
You lose, ******,
You know where to find me.
Bless you Oh Great Patriarch of the stupid azz ugly children here.Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Allow me to demonstrate why that is false...
Post your reason for not casting a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty....
@Huey ?Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Allow me to demonstrate why that is false...
Post your reason for not casting a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty....
Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑@Huey ?Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Allow me to demonstrate why that is false...
Post your reason for not casting a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty....
Can a man (born a biological male) get pregnant? Or need an abortion? Yes or no, Science Denier.
:rofl:
Me answering a question that has been answered MULTIPLE times does not relieve you from answering a question you have never answered.Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑![]()
We don't play that anymore.
Now set your example...
That is the funniest, and biggest lie, you have have ever posted, Too Far.I don't run from questions or my own words.
Tiny,Huey » 18 Jan 2026, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Me answering a question that has been answered MULTIPLE times does not relieve you from answering a question you have never answered.
Run from you words, liar:
That is the funniest, and biggest lie, you have have ever posted, Too Far.
Stop **** lying. I repeatedly gave you a chance to prove that you answered, and you evaded. As always.Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑
I've answered @Vegas question....he's acknowledged it.
Vegas » 17 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you all wonder why I keep asking @Blackvegetable that multiple choice question?
Because he is ignorant scum. That's why. We all know that moron doesn't answer questions after being asked only once. When engaging a narcissist, never put yourself into a position that you could lose. They are proficient manipulators and liars. Either make it a win-win or don't engage at all. This is a win-win for me. If he doesn't answer, I win. We get to enjoy watching him humiliate himself by running and evading. It's like watching a miserable dope-smoking scumbag try to escape a room while getting a beatdown. The crowd laughs. It's fun to watch. On the hand, if he does answer, he humiliates himself because he will fail miserably when he tries to defend his answer. He knows he will.
Deal:
But...for those of you who are tired of seeing it. I'll make a deal. Veghead's main response to the multiple choice question is that he already provided a definition. That's all he says now. Deflecting is a narcissist trait. We all know that. However, if anyone can prove that the question below is asking for the definition, then I will leave permanently. The mods can ban me forever. Since he can't defend his answer, he deflects to an answer to another question. Then turns around and says he answered it. You all know how he is. It's just his MO.
Anyway. If any forum member wishes to take the deal, then have at it.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
jerrab » 17 Jan 2026, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ so what?
I asked you 3 days ago if there is a good reason for trump to invade greenland and you did NOT answer.
Vegas » 18 Jan 2026, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ Stop **** lying. I repeatedly gave you a chance to prove that you answered, and you evaded. As always.
God you **** liar. The extent you will go to evade a question is pitiful/
why should I care?I repeatedly gave you a chance to prove
You don't prove anything to me.Vegas » 18 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I never claimed there was a rule. If I claimed it, then post it.
Post the rule about me exposing your cowardice.
And the projection continues...you know as well as I do that you, on top of evading questions, refuse to provide evidence of your claims.Blackvegetable » 18 Jan 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't prove anything to me.
I will reciprocate...