Liberal Forum

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:24 pm

You welshed, as always. 

Coward. Learn the meaning of the word "evidence."

"Attributed as...."



:rofl:  
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:28 pm

"Attributed as...."

I literally proved that AI approved this yesterday. Do you seriously not recall? Come on. 

It was just yesterday. WTF?

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:30 pm

I literally proved that AI approved this yesterday. Do you seriously not recall? Come on. 

It was just yesterday. WTF?

But you're a chronic liar...

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:37 pm

But you're a chronic liar...

you can't answer a simple yes or no question.... can a man get pregnant?

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:37 pm

But you're a chronic liar...

But you are a chronic dope smoker that fried almost every memory cell you have. 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:40 pm

But you are a chronic dope smoker that fried almost every memory cell you have.

Can you post any evidence? 


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:42 pm

Can you post any evidence?

That your memory is ****? Daily. 

You don't even know the meaning of the word "evidence." So shut up.

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:43 pm

That your memory is ****? Daily. 

You don't even know the meaning of the word "evidence." So shut up.

Post it.

You don't even know the meaning of the word "evidence." 

It looks like this.


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:47 pm

Post it.

It looks like this.


 

This pic proves that you don't know what evidence is. How many god damn times do you need to be told that you didn't prove you answered it the first time? 

Then to prove it more, you demand that I prove a negative. 



QED. You literally just proved me right.
 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:57 pm

This pic proves that you don't know what evidence is. How many god damn times do you need to be told that you didn't prove you answered it the first time? 

Then to prove it more, you demand that I prove a negative. 

QED. You literally just proved me right.

It proves you're an idiot who can't read and lies as one consequence. 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 12:59 pm

It proves you're an idiot who can't read and lies as one consequence.

Can you or can you not prove that you answered it the first time?

Did you or did you not demand I prove a negative? 


You are clueless on what evidence is. Clueless. 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm

Can you or can you not prove that you answered it the first time?

Did you or did you not demand I prove a negative? 

You are clueless on what evidence is. Clueless.

Obviously not...

Neither can you.

Do you have an issue with that?


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:03 pm

Obviously not...

Neither can you.

Do you have an issue with that?

Then QED. You provided an assertion, not evidence. 

Next.

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:06 pm

Then QED. You provided an assertion, not evidence. 

Next.

It is unambiguous evidence that you don't read posts, lie and are prohibitively likely a moron.

Prove me wrong.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:09 pm

It is unambiguous evidence that you don't read posts, lie and are prohibitively likely a moron.

Prove me wrong.

It's unambiguous evidence that you can't prove that you answer questions after being asked just once.
You lie instead.

prove me wrong.

Ask me why

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:15 pm

It's unambiguous evidence that you can't prove that you answer questions after being asked just once.
You lie instead.

prove me wrong.

Ask me why

No...you don't understand "evidence"

Did you fail to read the post?

Did you lie about it?

Was it complicated? 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:22 pm

No...you don't understand "evidence"

Did you fail to read the post?

Did you lie about it?

Was it complicated?

Three **** questions in one post. Hiding 3 times. 


 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:23 pm

Three **** questions in one post. Hiding 3 times.

You're hiding....from them.

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm

You're hiding....from them.

^^^

DSM‑5‑TR

• While the DSM avoids psychoanalytic language, it describes narcissistic traits that align with projection:
  • Externalization of blame
  • Lack of accountability
  • Hypersensitivity to ego threat
• These traits explain why projection is commonly observed in narcissistic individuals.

 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2026, 1:26 pm

^^^

Show what it says about Tantrumstalking....