Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
It's A Nazi Bar? NFW!!!
It's A Nazi Bar? NFW!!!
By Blackvegetable
19 Jan 2026 7:18 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
19 Jan 2026 12:32 pm
**** your demands. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
19 Jan 2026 12:36 pm
This is indisputable EVIDENCE that you are lying.Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ **** your demands. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing.
19 Jan 2026 12:37 pm
19 Jan 2026 12:40 pm
Already went through your incompetence about this.
Either prove that you answered the first time or **** off.
You even admitted that you can't. Assertion is not evidence.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
19 Jan 2026 1:07 pm
There's nothing to "go through"
It speaks for itself.
And your idiocy.
19 Jan 2026 1:31 pm
19 Jan 2026 1:55 pm
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ There's nothing to "go through"
It speaks for itself.
And your idiocy.
Yeah, it shows that it is self-evident that you know nothing about evidence.
liar.
1. Same ****: Pic...prove first time..prove a negative...etc...etc...same ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
19 Jan 2026 2:00 pm
Did you fail to read the post?Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, it shows that it is self-evident that you know nothing about evidence.
liar.
1. Same ****: Pic...prove first time..prove a negative...etc...etc...same ****.
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
19 Jan 2026 2:02 pm
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you fail to read the post?
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
Did you prove you answered the first time?
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
19 Jan 2026 2:06 pm
Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you prove you answered the first time?
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
It isn't what it is represented as proving.Did you prove you answered the first time?
Did you fail to read the post?
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
19 Jan 2026 2:07 pm
The **** it isn't. That is all of it. If you had a history of answering the first time, then we wouldn't even be having this conversation. **** your deflection.Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑
It isn't what it is represented as proving.
Did you fail to read the post?
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
Did you prove you answered the first time?
Did you lie about it?
Was it complicated?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
19 Jan 2026 4:01 pm
What did he say that was untrue?Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.texasobserver.org/ice-prose ... x-account/
That same Tuesday morning, an X account with over 17,000 followers named GlomarResponder made an ominous post. “Yeah, I’m in a courthouse wating [sic] on warrants,” GlomarResponder wrote. “Turns out there’s a lot of bitch work to be done to make mass deportations happen.” One day prior, GlomarResponder had posted that he “Can confirm all of those,” regarding a list of cities where ICE was expected to begin deportation operations the next day. “May have a betting pool to see who can guess which one I’m at on any particular day, based on the news,” GlomarResponder wrote...
Since GlomarResponder was first created in 2012, the account has posted hateful, xenophobic, and pro-fascist content. “America is a White nation, founded by Whites. … Our country should favor us,” GlomarResponder wrote last month. “All blacks are foreign to my people, dumb ****,” the account posted in September of last year. “Freedom of association hasn’t existed in this country since 1964 at the absolute latest,” GlomarResponder wrote four months prior, further clarifying the post was referring to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in a reply to a comment. “I’m not a commie, I’m a fascist,” GlomarResponder posted a couple weeks later. “Fascists solve communist problems. Get your insults right, retard.”
In August, GlomarResponder posted: “‘Migrants’ are all criminals.” Two months later, GlomarResponder shared an image that reads: “It is our holy duty to guard against the foreign hordes.” Some GlomarResponder posts evoke anti-immigrant violence: “Nobody is proposing feeding migrants into tree shredders,” the account posted in March 2024. “Yet. Give it a few more weeks at this level of invasion, and that will be the moderate position.” And in January: “My WWII vet grandfather didn’t get a chance to kill asians, so he volunteered for Korea. He’d be asking for a short term job with ICE kicking doors and swinging a baton.”
Rodden’s ICE employment is confirmed by federal court records, background interviews, and Observer courtroom visits.
Proud Son of the South...
Axing for a friend.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
19 Jan 2026 4:16 pm
Oh, the irreverence..Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ What did he say that was untrue?
Axing for a friend.
So sassy
19 Jan 2026 4:40 pm
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
19 Jan 2026 5:12 pm
So, no answer. No defense of your own OP.
No chops, fruitcake.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
19 Jan 2026 5:29 pm
Where's the challenge?Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ So, no answer. No defense of your own OP.
No chops, fruitcake.
I don't touch myself, rhetorically, the way you do.
19 Jan 2026 5:31 pm
We shouldn't be having it since no one does.Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ The **** it isn't. That is all of it. If you had a history of answering the first time, then we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
19 Jan 2026 5:33 pm
I axed you which part of what he said you disagreed with.Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Where's the challenge?
I don't touch myself, rhetorically, the way you do.
None, apparently.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
19 Jan 2026 5:35 pm
PhiloBeddo » 19 Jan 2026, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ If Trump is Hitler and we are Nazi's, why do you stay here?
Queer for punishment?
19 Jan 2026 5:36 pm
And you think that's the point of the OP?Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I axed you which part of what he said you disagreed with.
None, apparently.
Who is online
In total there are 2748 users online :: 13 registered, 13 bots, and 2722 guests
Registered users: *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Squatchman, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: proximic, coccocbot, facebookexternalhit, Mojeek, YandexBot, Googlebot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Baiduspider, Applebot