You are the one who copy-pasted it. One would expect you might be willing to defend it.
No...don't go **** now...Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the one who copy-pasted it. One would expect you might be willing to defend it.
But you never fail to fail.
AGAIN, you retarded ****: It is YOUR copy-paste.Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ No...don't go **** now...
What do you think is the point of the OP?
That's not the question.
Queer, even if your "question" were an honest one (it isn't), you would have no claim on me for an answer. You flee questions as a vampire flees garlic and crosses, you weak little broad.Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not the question.
Try to address it without the writhing.
Answer, gaseous pile of ****.
You know the answer, peter puffer.
brown carries around a real set of...Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ So, no answer. No defense of your own OP.
No chops, fruitcake.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yea...Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You know the answer, peter puffer.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Go whimper to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
What does it have to do with that whimpering neuter?
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2026, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑ What does it have to do with that whimpering neuter?
Is that what you said in that nazi bar you went into?
No, YOU do....Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that what you said in that nazi bar you went into?![]()
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
viewtopic.php?t=99907
Damn, are you **** stupid.Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ And you claim you are not a stalker. How many times a day do you dig in a member's profile to copy their OPs?
No thoughts of your own. None whatsoever. You are even proud of it.
Do you have any idea where the link leads?Vegas » 19 Jan 2026, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Translation: I nuked twice now.
You aren't having a good day with me today.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif