Did you say pattern?
Perhaps you should read what the Times said.Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ How interesting that it got the 1.4 billion right, huh?
So, you're saying that Trumpie-pooh was FIRST accused of that precise number FALSELY, and then accused of that exact same number correctly?![]()
Seen any unicorns lately?![]()
![]()
I think you should kill yourself.Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Got milk, bitch?
Tell the board why SNOPES is full of ****, fruitcake.
Is this the same NYT that lied us into the Iraq war?
Chink is a vulgar ethnic slur for chinaman.
"did the nyt editorial board sign off on the now debunked russia collusion story?"Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2026, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ A review by the editorial board relying on analyses from news organizations shows that Mr. Trump has used the office of the presidency to make at least $1.4 billion. We know this number to be an underestimate because some of his profits remain hidden from public view. And they continue to grow.
They've got him this time.RebelGator » 21 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I know you won't get fooled again....I just know it....really you won't.....surely you've learned a lesson....damn, what am I saying, you'll keep suckin'.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
A bare two weeks after the attacks of September 11, at the end of a long and emotional day at the White House, a sixty-nine-year-old politician and businessman—a midwesterner, born of modest means but grown wealthy and prominent and powerful—returned to his enormous suite of offices on the seventh floor of the flood-lit and wounded Pentagon and, as was his habit, scrawled out a memorandum on his calendar:Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Is this the same NYT that lied us into the Iraq war?
Axing for a fiend.
What did the times say last summer, that SNOPES smacked down?
Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑ "did the nyt editorial board sign off on the now debunked russia collusion story?"
AI Overview
The New York Times editorial board did not directly "sign off" on news reporting, but the paper extensively covered allegations of 2016 Trump-Russia collusion, sharing a 2018 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting. While the Pulitzer Prize Board defended the coverage, critics and findings from the Mueller investigation showed no conspiracy, leading to accusations of promoting a "hoax".
- Editorial vs. News: The Editorial Board operates independently of the newsroom, which produced the reporting, though they often shared similar viewpoints on the story.
- Controversy and Review: The Pulitzer Board conducted independent reviews, rejecting requests to rescind the award, despite arguments that the reporting relied on now-discredited or unsubstantiated information, such as the Steele dossier.
now debunked russia collusion story?"
Come back after you've read what the Times said.
Is this^ to suggest that the NYT was only an ACCOMPLICE when they helped to lie us into that war?Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2026, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ A bare two weeks after the attacks of September 11, at the end of a long and emotional day at the White House, a sixty-nine-year-old politician and businessman—a midwesterner, born of modest means but grown wealthy and prominent and powerful—returned to his enormous suite of offices on the seventh floor of the flood-lit and wounded Pentagon and, as was his habit, scrawled out a memorandum on his calendar:
Interesting day—NSC mtg. with President—As [it] ended he asked to see me alone…After the meeting ended I went to Oval Office—He was aloneHe was at his desk—He talked about the meetThen he said I want you to develop a plan to invade Ir[aq]. Do it outside the normal channels. Do it creatively so we don’t have to take so much cover [?]
Then he said Dick [Cheney] told me about your son—I broke down and cried. I couldn’t speak—said I love him so muchHe said I can’t imagine the burden you are carrying for the country and your son—He said much more.Stood and hugged meAn amazing day—He is a fine human being—I am so grateful he is President.I am proud to be working for him.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/12/19/rumsfelds-war-and-its-consequences-now/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=December%203%202013&utm_content=December%203%202013+CID_0f499f28b68d7642ed57c93bf0bc9c06&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Rumsfelds%20War%20and%20Its%20Consequences%20Now
Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑ They've got him this time.
He didn't steal the FIRST 1.4 billion they accused him of last August. But he stole THIS 1.4 billion, THIS time.
Just face it, man. Trump is toast. He had a good run, but they've GOT him. He's done.
But he stole THIS 1.4 billion, THIS time.
AI didn't quibble, panty dancer.
I read it, fruitcake.
It's everyone's fault....but the War Preznit's....Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Is this^ to suggest that the NYT was only an ACCOMPLICE when they helped to lie us into that war?
If so, I agree. Shake on it?
If you want it quoted, fruitcake, quote it yourself.
Yes, it is. Including the NYT, for the fake news.
Lying sniveling little ****,Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I read it, fruitcake.
Axing you if it was the same NYT did not mean I had not read the claims.
The only thing noteworthy was the crypto claims.