Liberal Forum

Trump put tariffs on a Penguin island. 
 
 

PhiloBeddo » 21 Jan 2026, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 3:40 pm

Trump was right again. Looks like we got Greenland. LOL What the ****. Greatest President of all Time.

Phil I find your foolishness amusing. Trump didn't get Greenland. 
Maduro is probably pissed off he got arrested; he should have agreed to an oil and mineral deal.

https://x.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/20 ... 6377280993
 
 

PhiloBeddo » 21 Jan 2026, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 3:51 pm

Want to bet. You stupid Liberal. You lost again.

Phil, how much can you afford to lose.
 

JohnnyYou » 22 Jan 2026, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 12:50 pm

It was stunning to hear him talk about the deals he has made that have increased his net worth 273% since January in front of everybody in Davos.

He's corrupt.. and there isn't a damn thing anyone can do about it so he flaunts his evil in an attempt to impress people.

His Board of Peace met today. Badda Bing Bang Billions in the Bank Account. I hope they at least get a square meal out of the deal.

He isn't impressing peoplein davos. He is impressing actual demons. 
 

Huey » 21 Jan 2026, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 5:23 pm

As much as you are obsessed with Trump your powers of observation are ****.  Dum Dum, like many of deals he took the extreme position, in this case making Greenland to finally get what he wanted.

Making Greenland a state would be stupid.  They are very socialist and have government subsidies to include housing.  They would get two senators who would probably be dems, as well a house member.

The "deal' seems to be some sovereign land for us as well as increasing the the personel in Thule.

explain. what changes were made?
 

ConservativeWave » 22 Jan 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 1:45 pm

RISK WW3?  Donald Trump did NOTHING of the sort... what he did was he REMINDED Europe, and the REST of the WORLD, who the BOSS was... and that he expects to be TREATED with RESPECT !

America has supported NATO for the last 50+ years... and all they do is make promises that they can't keep !  BUT NOW, THIS is something that is CRITICAL for America, as WELL as the world... and Denmark (who can't even take care of themselves), and NATO (who aren't much better)... are going to stand in America's way of protecting themselves, the Western Hemisphere, and NATO itself, by REFUSING us a CRITICALLY located ICE COVERED island, because THEY have an INFLATED view of themselves?

I think Trump made it VERY clear that we value Europe and NATO... but when a CRITICAL NEED of America is NOT taken seriously by them?... Donald Trump did EXACTLY what he SHOULD have done... and EXACTLY WHAT a COMPETENT President of the U.S.A. HAD to do !!

AND YOU?  YOU can't UNDERSTAND that?  ...WHO'S the IDIOT !!

you proved that you only care about trump, not america.


--------------------------------------------------The President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option at the Commander in Chief’s disposal,” she said. Leavitt’s statement comes on the heels of a report by The Wall Street Journal that indicated Secretary of State Marco Rubio told congressional lawmakers during a closed-door briefing Monday that Trump’s goal is to buy the island from Denmark. The administration has once again increased its pressure on potentially obtaining the island following its capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.Trump has touted taking over Greenland before, but the Venezuela operation has upped those sentiments.“We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it,” Trump told reporters on Sunday. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller echoed Trump’s remarks in an interview with CNN on Monday. 
 

jerrab » 22 Jan 2026, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 3:09 pm

explain. what changes were made?

I guess Fat Granny's google is broke.  

Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 3:07 pm

He isn't impressing peoplein davos. He is impressing actual demons.

For as much as we disagree, we align more.

But your Pal Putin is on the demon list too.




 

JohnnyYou » 22 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm

For as much as we disagree, we align more.

But your Pal Putin is on the demon list too.

Only because you are retarded, and listen to too much fox noise. 

Putin had the SMO forced upon him by a coup and the planting of an anti-Russian government on his border with the intention of putting NATO missiles there. If Russia had tried the same crap in Mexico, you would suddenly "understand." But the shoe is on the other foot, so you remain wilfully ignorant. 
 

Huey » 22 Jan 2026, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 4:15 pm

I guess Fat Granny's google is broke.

nope

what are the changes?

Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 4:45 pm

Only because you are retarded, and listen to too much fox noise. 

Putin had the SMO forced upon him by a coup and the planting of an anti-Russian government on his border with the intention of putting NATO missiles there. If Russia had tried the same crap in Mexico, you would suddenly "understand." But the shoe is on the other foot, so you remain wilfully ignorant.

I am guessing Gorbachev's Pizza Hut chain probably didn't increase his net worth 273%.  A promise was made to protect Ukranian soveriegnty when they agreed to ship all their nukes to the motherland.  If I was Zelensky, I would not expect a security agreement from Trump to last 15 minutes. Let alone 15 years.  Thinking in terms of 50 years is interesting, but ridiculous.

Trump just wants to have one more ounce of wealth than Putin. My brother wanted to make just one more dollar than Frank when he kicked him out of the home building business. He started his own.  He went too far in the S+L Loan Crisis in the 80's and ended up getting busted for fraud and three years inside the system. He admitted his goal to get back at Frank and be more succesful led him down a bad path.

Trump's dementia seems very real to me..  He is very  sick.  And we don't need no moral guidance from international law.  It's all inside his head. Vladdy Daddy ain't gettin any younger either,
 

JohnnyYou » 22 Jan 2026, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 5:04 pm

I am guessing Gorbachev's Pizza Hut chain probably didn't increase his net worth 273%.  A promise was made to protect Ukranian soveriegnty when they agreed to ship all their nukes to the motherland.  If I was Zelensky, I would not expect a security agreement from Trump to last 15 minutes. Let alone 15 years.  Thinking in terms of 50 years is interesting, but ridiculous.

Trump just wants to have one more ounce of wealth than Putin. My brother wanted to make just one more dollar than Frank when he kicked him out of the home building business. He started his own.  He went too far in the S+L Loan Crisis in the 80's and ended up getting busted for fraud and three years inside the system. He admitted his goal to get back at Frank and be more succesful led him down a bad path.

Trump's dementia seems very real to me..  He is very  sick.  And we don't need no moral guidance from international law.  It's all inside his head. Vladdy Daddy ain't gettin any younger either,

Hey, stupid. In the same treaty under which Russia gave Ukraine its statehood for the first time in all of history, Ukraine swore to obey its CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE of military neutrality. Announcing the intention to vioilate its Constitution by joining a military alliance hostile to its neighbor in a direct threat to its neighbor's security interests voided Russia's obligation. 

Try to think, you ignorant **** ape.

And those nukes? They were made in and by and for Russia, at Russia's expense. They NEVER belonged to Ukraine. Ukraine was a **** vassal state in the soviet system. When Ukraine went to Russia, hat in hand, asking to be allowed to organize itself as an ethno-state for the first time in history, "Ya gotta give our nukes back, of course" was not a major negotiating point. It was something that Ukraine could never have said no to, ESPEICALLY considering the US wanted those **** things back in Russia and so did all of Europe. 

In no alternative universe was the nascent, pre-failed kleptocracy going to be allowed to traffic those nukes, you **** idiot. You think in cartoons, boy. You have a spoon-fed, bite-sized understanding of the conflict on which you presume to run your sperm bank. 
 

Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 5:13 pm

Hey, stupid. In the same treaty under which Russia gave Ukraine its statehood for the first time in all of history, Ukraine swore to obey its CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE of military neutrality. Announcing the intention to vioilate its Constitution by joining a military alliance hostile to its neighbor in a direct threat to its neighbor's security interests voided Russia's obligation. 

Try to think, you ignorant **** ape.

And those nukes? They were made in and by and for Russia, at Russia's expense. They NEVER belonged to Ukraine. Ukraine was a **** vassal state in the soviet system. When Ukraine went to Russia, hat in hand, asking to be allowed to organize itself as an ethno-state for the first time in history, "Ya gotta give our nukes back, of course" was not a major negotiating point. It was something that Ukraine could never have said no to, ESPEICALLY considering the US wanted those **** things back in Russia and so did all of Europe. 

In no alternative universe was the nascent, pre-failed kleptocracy going to be allowed to traffic those nukes, you **** idiot. You think in cartoons, boy. You have a spoon-fed, bite-sized understanding of the conflict on which you presume to run your sperm bank.

You are defending a demon CP..  Hee has sent100'ks of concripts to their grave.  

The spaceship will be shared by all or it blows up in Oppenheimers nightmare.

We gotta get Trump into Space.. If it''s the last thing we ever do..   I don't want to see his phooking  face. World there's a better place for me and YOU!
 

jerrab » 21 Jan 2026, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 3:19 pm

in other words trump backed down..................... next..........................................
--------------------------------4 min ago
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ ... s-01-21-26

Dow surges 700 points after Trump backs off Greenland and tariff threatsFrom CNN's John TowfighiUS stocks jumped higher Wednesday afternoon after Trump posted on social media that he had a productive meeting with Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of NATO, and will not be imposing his planned tariffs on European countries that were set for February 1.The Dow surged 722 points, or 1.49%. The S&P 500 rose 1.47% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq rose 1.6%.

The S&P 500 is less than 1.5% away from a record high.Stocks had already been moving higher throughout the day after Trump in the morning said he would not use “excessive strength and force” to acquire Greenland.The sharp reversal prompted relief on Wall Street. Some analysts had expected Trump to back down from his tariff threats — a nod to the “Trump Always Chickens Out,” or TACO, trade. While uncertainty remains, Wall Street rallied on the shift in tone.“Looks like it’s TACO Wednesday,” said Art Hogan, chief market strategist for B. Riley Financial.

Where in any of this does it say Trump backed down? It said he won't use excessive strength and force. He doesn't need to because a deal was reached.

JohnnyYou » 22 Jan 2026, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 5:22 pm

You are defending a demon CP..  Hee has sent100'ks of concripts to their grave.  

The spaceship will be shared by all or it blows up in Oppenheimers nightmare.

We gotta get Trump into Space.. If it''s the last thing we ever do..   I don't want to see his phooking  face. World there's a better place for me and YOU!

Those soldiers were DEFENDING RUSSIA. Allowing NATO missiles on Russia's border would end Russia's sovereignty and result in Russia being broken up and plundered. That was the plan.It failed. 

Wars of self defense are honorable, fruitcake. Those soldiers died for their country - not for western bankers, as the Coupkies are doing.
 
 

Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm

Where in any of this does it say Trump backed down? It said he won't use excessive strength and force. He doesn't need to because a deal was reached.

anything short owning greenland shows trump backed down.

Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm

Where in any of this does it say Trump backed down? It said he won't use excessive strength and force. He doesn't need to because a deal was reached.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74x4m71pmjo

Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm

Where in any of this does it say Trump backed down? It said he won't use excessive strength and force. He doesn't need to because a deal was reached.

------------------------------------------------
On January 17, Trump threatened an additional 10% tariff on goods from 8 European countries unless they supported his purchase of Greenland. He said that the tariff would begin February 1, and rise to 25% on June 1 unless a deal was reached.

------------------------------------------------------------

did the 8 European countries agree to the selling of greenland?

answer yes or no.
 

jerra » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 5:14 pm

Huey » 22 Jan 2026, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2026, 4:15 pm

I guess Fat Granny's google is broke.

nope

what are the changes?

 

I sm not your servant.  Google it.  

MR-7 » 21 Jan 2026, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2026, 4:55 pm

You don't understand. You are, well, kind of stupid. TRUMP will decide where our Air Defense systems will go on this island to best protect Greenland, and of course America. And I'm pretty sure Greenland will become "part of" America before TRUMP's 3rd term is up.

      JFC! you did it now! jerritol's gonna go postal with posts...