Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The New All Purpose Punchline....
The New All Purpose Punchline....
By Blackvegetable
22 Jan 2026 5:39 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
22 Jan 2026 10:46 am
No, you haven't
22 Jan 2026 10:47 am
**** off. Your lies are so exhausting. Just stop already.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 11:05 am
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VxOlv6RCAvcRebelGator » 22 Jan 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ When Maduro gets thru spilling the beans about voting machine rigging......your ilk will be taking all those available spaces in federal prisons.
Karma, it's a beautiful thing, Fraudster.
22 Jan 2026 11:15 am
Ban Pow Whack.. Na na na na na na na na TRUMPMAN and Robbin' us...
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
22 Jan 2026 12:21 pm
Trump Sues Jamie Dimon And JPMorgan Chase For ‘Political Debanking’ After Jan. 6 Riot
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopeq ... an-6-riot/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopeq ... an-6-riot/
22 Jan 2026 12:44 pm
Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump Sues Jamie Dimon And JPMorgan Chase For ‘Political Debanking’ After Jan. 6 Riot
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopeq ... an-6-riot/
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 12:44 pm
Peanut gallery is for pussies.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
22 Jan 2026 1:01 pm
It's positively hirsute compared to reddies...
22 Jan 2026 1:03 pm
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:07 pm
And we both know you will continue to lie about me never giving the definition. LIE LIE LIE!
All you do is lie.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:08 pm
Post it.Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ And we both know you will continue to lie about me never giving the definition. LIE LIE LIE!
All you do is lie.
22 Jan 2026 1:09 pm
You can't possibly be this stupid.
I prove that I posted it less than 10 minutes ago and you take off a month.
Deal?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:12 pm
Did you post it out of my sight?Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't possibly be this stupid.
I prove that I posted it less than 10 minutes ago and you take off a month.
Deal?
22 Jan 2026 1:13 pm
**** your questions. You don't answer mine, so I owe you nothing. And it isn't my fault that you are too damn stupid to figure out how to bypass the ban. I figured it out in 5 seconds.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:16 pm
Then, as far as I can see, you haven't.
22 Jan 2026 1:17 pm
"I kicked your ***......Chase me!"Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑
And it isn't my fault that you are too damn stupid to figure out how to bypass the ban. I figured it out in 5 seconds.
22 Jan 2026 3:53 pm
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... testimony/
“It was always about politics,” committee chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said, accusing Smith and his team of meddling in “the democratic process by seeking to muscle a candidate for a high office.”
Smith told lawmakers he stood by his decision to charge Trump in two felony indictments — the first focused on his alleged mishandling of classified documents, the second on his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
“If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat,” Smith said. “No one should be above the law in our country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”
“It was always about politics,” committee chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said, accusing Smith and his team of meddling in “the democratic process by seeking to muscle a candidate for a high office.”
Smith told lawmakers he stood by his decision to charge Trump in two felony indictments — the first focused on his alleged mishandling of classified documents, the second on his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
“If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat,” Smith said. “No one should be above the law in our country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”
22 Jan 2026 4:10 pm
Vegas is probably one of those people who cause a scene at the Department of Motor Vehicles.
My god he sucks at forum ping pong.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
23 Jan 2026 9:27 am
23 Jan 2026 1:41 pm
Says the ****** coward that fears opposing views.
Who is online
In total there are 5402 users online :: 7 registered, 19 bots, and 5376 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, Pinterest, Adsbot, DuckDuckBot, proximic, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Kinza, ADmantX, DuckDuckGo, Mediapartners-Google, Mediatoolkitbot, Googlebot, Applebot, curl/7, linkfluence.com, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, GPTBot