YUO won't answer questions, so GO **** YOURSELF!!
Just post the rule.
Post it yourself.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Another tantrumstalk?
Give it a rest, rube.
You can always create another account to see my PG thread.
I can't see any reason for such effort to read what you don't consider worth reading.Vegas » 29 Jan 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ You can always create another account to see my PG thread.
Or cry to MrKelly/Johnny You and have them copy it for you.
SGDFS![]()
Translation: You are too **** stupid to figure out the how to bypass the ban.Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ I can't see any reason for such effort to read what you don't consider worth reading.
Or not be logged inVegas » 29 Jan 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ You can always create another account to see my PG thread.
Or cry to MrKelly/Johnny You and have them copy it for you.
SGDFS :rofl: :rofl:
Were that true, why did you ban @CP's Battered Uvula ?Vegas » 29 Jan 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Translation: You are too **** stupid to figure out the how to bypass the ban.
yeah, I know.
Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Were that true, why did you ban @CP's Battered Uvula ?
Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Were that true, why did you ban @CP's Battered Uvula ?
Vegas » 29 Jan 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you think? God man. You are so dumb. That was your other account, but if you create another one, I won't know the new name. Oh my God...
Dumb! Dumb! Dumb!
**** stupid ***.
Why do you think?
The stupid *** way. Try doing it the easier way. Moron.Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑
Because I already figured out how to evade the ban
Duh!
Not worth the effort
Clearly not, as you've been begging me to read the **** even you refuse to read.
What have I "begged" you to read?Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly not, as you've been begging me to read the **** even you refuse to read.
The all purpose punchline when arguing against a thing like you is, "You can't even tell a male from a female, without a Multiphasic Personality Inventory." It pretty much dismisses any argument as coming from a fool.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
![]()
The mass sweeps of the biden/anonymous administration imprisoned people who never entered the capitol.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ They ransacked the U.S. Capitol and want the government to pay them back
The president’s pardon freed Jan. 6 rioters from prison and emboldened them to demand money from the government.
https://wapo.st/45s1L0C