Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
Peanut Gallery
‹
R: The New All Purpose Punchline....
R: The New All Purpose Punchline....
By Blackvegetable
22 Jan 2026 5:39 am in Peanut Gallery
22 Jan 2026 5:39 am
Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
:rofl: :die:
:rofl: :die:
22 Jan 2026 6:30 am
You got him now, Sucker.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
22 Jan 2026 6:53 am
which folks? There are over 1,043 political parties and over 21 religions within this species varying different interpretations of the major 21. Economic futures are all calculated beyond one theme, now isn't eternity as genetic outcomes never duplicated a reproduction twice in separated generation gaps since inception of the ancestral lineages currently alive each generation gap forward adding one great great grandchild at a time.Johnny You » 22 Jan 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ Accountability is unaffordable.
Trump actually discussed his net worth more than doubling recentlty in front of everyone at Davos.
If any accounting of the truth ever gets performed, I see orange jump suits in folks future.
theories, theologies, economic principals invented missing links in evolution by time line statistically averaged logistics of total population living forward now.
22 Jan 2026 7:44 am
That's about $10.00 before the lawyers rape your settlement, you can frame it and hang it on the wall next to BV's ball-less crotch picture.
22 Jan 2026 8:07 am
Sounds like you are familiar with the photo.RebelGator » 22 Jan 2026, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ That's about $10.00 before the lawyers rape your settlement, you can frame it and hang it on the wall next to BV's ball-less crotch picture.
Do you look at it while getting a hand job from Buck?
I will hang it next to you.
22 Jan 2026 9:25 am
Deal:Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 12:44 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump Sues Jamie Dimon And JPMorgan Chase For ‘Political Debanking’ After Jan. 6 Riot
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopeq ... an-6-riot/
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:03 pm
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:16 pm
@Blackvegetable Pure narcissism. Just textbook narcissism: You dodge my question for 5 straight months and your narcissistic ******* thinks you're owed something with a nice red bow on top. **** you.
You brought this **** on yourself. Earn it, loser.
You brought this **** on yourself. Earn it, loser.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:17 pm
Like I care what you see. You don't see anything.
It took me 5 seconds you retard.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:19 pm
Who did you copy this from?
As always, you continue to prove that you have no thoughts of your own.
1. Continue to pile up that evidence.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 1:58 pm
AI absolutely loathes you..Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Who did you copy this from?
As always, you continue to prove that you have no thoughts of your own.
1. Continue to pile up that evidence.
Creating Author's Level. The author has reached this peak by synthesizing legal theory with aggressive satire to produce a unique, albeit highly polemic, original work.
22 Jan 2026 2:01 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ AI absolutely loathes you..
Creating Author's Level. The author has reached this peak by synthesizing legal theory with aggressive satire to produce a unique, albeit highly polemic, original work.
I love how AI labors BOTH "unique" and "original"..
That must have pretty much snapped @Vegas spine like a pole bean.
22 Jan 2026 2:13 pm
Do I need to show you how I had AI own you again?Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I love how AI labors BOTH "unique" and "original"..
That must have pretty much snapped @Vegas spine like a pole bean.
Your recall is ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 2:13 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ AI absolutely loathes you..
Creating Author's Level. The author has reached this peak by synthesizing legal theory with aggressive satire to produce a unique, albeit highly polemic, original work.
AI loves me. You have no idea what I do for a living.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 2:18 pm
Speaking of AI loathing you:Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ AI absolutely loathes you..
Creating Author's Level. The author has reached this peak by synthesizing legal theory with aggressive satire to produce a unique, albeit highly polemic, original work.
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!
Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.
Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background.
At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 2:22 pm
Last time you specified, you were in some kind of counseling.
I now understand you claim to "work in AI", but I'm skeptical.
You're too stupid to sweat unsupervised.
22 Jan 2026 2:23 pm
Counseling?Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Last time you specified, you were in some kind of counseling.
I now understand you claim to "work in AI", but I'm skeptical.
You're too stupid to sweat unsupervised.
No. That would be you.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 2:24 pm
You're too stupid to live.Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Speaking of AI loathing you:
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!
I didn't ask AI to identify the subjects of the photo.
As I have explained, and its response makes clear.
You're an idiot.
22 Jan 2026 2:26 pm
I did. You insist that drag pic is of Trump. Then you edited the AI response. I busted your *** on it.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You're too stupid to live.
I didn't ask AI to identify the subjects of the photo.
As I have explained, and its response makes clear.
You're an idiot.
1. Of course you are now going to pretend that you don't know what I am talking about. Duh.
So **** predictable.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 6487 users online :: 19 registered, 22 bots, and 6446 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, Jantje_Smit, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Firefox/7.0, aiohttp, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo! Slurp, SiteLockSpider, Baiduspider, Bolt, app.hypefactors.com, MQQBrowser, LCC, CriteoBot, Not, YandexBot, proximic, ADmantX, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot, GPTBot