Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
Peanut Gallery
‹
R: The New All Purpose Punchline....
R: The New All Purpose Punchline....
By Blackvegetable
22 Jan 2026 5:39 am in Peanut Gallery
22 Jan 2026 3:35 pm
No...I asked it to confirm the attribution.Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I did. You insist that drag pic is of Trump. Then you edited the AI response. I busted your *** on it.
1. Of course you are now going to pretend that you don't know what I am talking about. Duh.
So **** predictable.
The most effective prompt for the purpose.
Grafty is not in drag, Idiot...it's a TUNIC.
22 Jan 2026 4:08 pm
LOL. look...I busted your *******. I caught you editing AI's reply.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I asked it to confirm the attribution.
The most effective prompt for the purpose.
Grafty is not in drag, Idiot...it's a TUNIC.
I busted you! Now shut up.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
22 Jan 2026 4:14 pm
Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL. look...I busted your *******. I caught you editing AI's reply.
I busted you! Now shut up.
you did nothing of the sort..
22 Jan 2026 4:17 pm
Of course you are going to lie. Of course you are going to pretend that you have no recollection of what I am talking about.
This is your MO. Narcissist amnesia.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
23 Jan 2026 2:02 pm
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
23 Jan 2026 2:07 pm
Hiding twice. Refuses to be a man.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 7:53 am
Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday defended the Department of Justice's ongoing investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, dismissing concerns that the probe could weaken the central bank's traditional independence.
"I think that the message is that independence does not mean no accountability," Bessent told "CBS Saturday Morning" co-host Kelly O'Grady in an interview. "I've been calling for the Fed to do an internal investigation on numerous things since last spring, and they've chosen not to do it."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scott-bess ... ependence/
Bessent says Americans 'should be worried about affordability,' but blames Biden for cost issues
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bessent ... =129636939
fake news
29 Jan 2026 8:02 am
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Asked about the criminal investigation into Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump’s attempts to fire Ms. Cook, Mr. Bessent said, “There still needs to be accountability.”
Let's talk about CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS!!
How about that RAID OF THE FULTON COUNTY ELECTION CENTER to get all the evidence that your side TRIED TO put away that PROVES 2020 was a RIGGED ELECTION??
I imagine that Election offices in every BLUE STATE have every single person scrambling for cover with their asses puckered up so tighten they couldn't squeeze out a WHEAT SEED if their lives depended on it!!
And I can see the number of INDICTMENTS coming that your side will be making every **** excuse you can invent to avoid the SLAMMER!! It's going to be a 3 ring circus complete with CLOWNS AND IDIOTS!! What tole will you be playing on this one, DICKSUCK??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
29 Jan 2026 8:44 am
What is written or between the lines of what people believe possible?Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ You need to learn how to read..
The revelation made waves nationally. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger downplayed the error, saying it wouldn’t have changed the results of the heavily audited election.
“A clerical error at the end of the day does not erase valid, legal votes,” the secretary posted online. “Georgia has the most secure elections in the country and all voters were verified with photo ID and lawfully cast their ballots.”
ha ha ha ha ha, I found Eggplant's Achilles' heel
29 Jan 2026 8:54 am
Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ You need to learn how to read..
The revelation made waves nationally. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger downplayed the error, saying it wouldn’t have changed the results of the heavily audited election.
“A clerical error at the end of the day does not erase valid, legal votes,” the secretary posted online. “Georgia has the most secure elections in the country and all voters were verified with photo ID and lawfully cast their ballots.”
Rule of holes.
When you can't get out, stop digging. And yours is WAY DEEPER than that!!
It's a "clerical error" when there's 20. It's FRAUD when there are 315,000 out of a DHIM CONTROLED COUNTY, DICKSUCK!!
Now, **** OFF!! YOU LOST!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
29 Jan 2026 9:01 am
YUO won't answer questions, so GO **** YOURSELF!!
Run.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
29 Jan 2026 9:04 am
Post it yourself.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 9:07 am
**** your questions. You don't answer mine, so I owe you nothing.
1. Same
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 12:42 pm
Yeah, sure....
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 12:46 pm
What are you talking about? You just said you didn't read it.Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2026, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ You tried to rewrite something you plucked from the innertubes.
Not worth the time.
It doesn't matter. You could never prove your own claims anyway. Your own standards don't apply to you.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 12:48 pm
The greatest punchline ever is genetic outcomes have always been placing reproductions living eternally separated each generation gap by adapting in the universal geographical time displaced by the moment alive, here, now.
29 Jan 2026 12:55 pm
Yes. You expect me and everyone else to defend their claims. So yes, ****. You do.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 1:29 pm
Staying in character beyond your time living as a reproduction in a specific ancestral lineage and generation gap self evidently displaced in plain sight demands you sustain reasonable doubt cradle to grave.
See you didn't approve of my own version of an all purpose punchline. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
29 Jan 2026 1:34 pm
I already posted it. You refused to to admit it.
Then you demanded I repost it. **** you.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
29 Jan 2026 1:44 pm
Like I would expect you to admit it. Duh.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 6487 users online :: 19 registered, 22 bots, and 6446 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, Jantje_Smit, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Firefox/7.0, aiohttp, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo! Slurp, SiteLockSpider, Baiduspider, Bolt, app.hypefactors.com, MQQBrowser, LCC, CriteoBot, Not, YandexBot, proximic, ADmantX, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot, GPTBot