Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
You danced.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ His buddies at another forum are as stupid on the topic as he is. They want me to post my definition of terms (men and women) before trying to answer. I said if you need a definition you are too far gone to be in the conversation
Those are the words of @*MankyLittleSkidmark blowing the lid off the game.Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ You danced.
Challenged to define terms - de rigeure for honest argumentation, - you panty danced.
That doesn't reflect on the people you ran from - though if they are freinds of that dimwit, we can proceed without further evidence. I find it quite pathetic that they were able tomake you run. But that's on you.
Mistah Kottah, Mistah Kottah...Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ @Vegas
Can you figure out why you won't be banned from this thread?
Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Mistah Kottah, Mistah Kottah...
Because your copy paste is erudite, and you believe it to be over his head?
My "copy and paste"....Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Mistah Kottah, Mistah Kottah...
Because your copy paste is erudite, and you believe it to be over his head?
But you didn't read it.
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ But you didn't read it.
Neither did the chubby sissy in the mumu..
That's not what AI says.Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ But...but...but I don't care. Your threads are gay and stupid. Like you.
My feet almost fell off when he proivided us with a cheat sheet for comprehending the terms.
The glossary was provided by AI.Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ My feet almost fell off when he proivided us with a cheat sheet for comprehending the terms.
I remember reading the OP, noting the level of vocabulary and tone being remeniscent of what made print centuries ago, and deciding, "This certainly is not his own screed - he isn't capable." And then to turn around and see him providing a sort of gloassary of terms...I about fell over, just to follow my eyes.
As regards the vulgar level of thought which is put forth for public consumption today, I am a veritable Miniver Cheevy of resentment. I MISS the kind of writing that the OP presents. It's the level of writing on which I cut my literary teeth. To put it mildly, I had no need of a glossary of terms. That he presented one rather strongly suggests that he did.
No.
Neither comma is necessary.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑
A Laotian 4th grader, with reading issues, would readily understand that...the mumu sporting sex tourist propositioning him wouldn't.
Don't shimmy away, little bitch.
Cannonpointer » 22 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ My feet almost fell off when he proivided us with a cheat sheet for comprehending the terms.
I remember reading the OP, noting the level of vocabulary and tone being remeniscent of what made print centuries ago, and deciding, "This certainly is not his own screed - he isn't capable." And then to turn around and see him providing a sort of gloassary of terms...I about fell backward, just to follow my eyes.
As regards the vulgar level of thought which is put forth for public consumption today, I am a veritable Miniver Cheevy of resentment. I MISS the kind of writing that the OP presents. It's the level of writing on which I cut my literary teeth. To put it mildly, I had no need of a glossary of terms. That he presented one rather strongly suggests that he did.
Amateur, please....it's about pacing.
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not what AI says.
It continues to refuse to read your ****.