Liberal Forum

According to R "Eggplant" Suave, the Orange Pedo has certainly fixed the problem of "too many Americans working."

[Though, to be fair, I believe this trend started long before the Orang3 Ped0 took office a 2nd time. The Orange P3do is, however, making the problem worse.]

------------------

So why aren't the wealthy "creating jobs?"       

Isn't the economy BOOMING?

(Fed members, known for erring on caution's divide, believe the jobs "growth" per month is actually around -20K)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/payro ... -year-high

Which explains why they keep manipulating the numbers, it makes no difference which side of the same Uniparty coin is actually in power. At the last FOMC presser, even Powell stated that they believe the actual monthly "job creation" was at around MINUS 20K

 
 

Filing for unemployment has NOTHING TO DO WITH JOBS.

This is true. Plenty of loopholes exist in the system.

If a president told BLS to start reporting accurate statistics during his term, he would immediately be the worst-performing president in history.

   

Americans are too retarded to understand that a President who honestly reports the numbers, bad as they may be, is doing them a favor. Instead they would rather have someone like SAINT RAYGUN lie and twist the head of the BLS' arm until they implement "heuristic changes" to permanently bias UE rates lower when calculated, unreflective of reality

     
 
 

At least one retarded azzwipe will, at some point, counter the OP with:

"Well, have you seen any POOR PEOPLE create any jobs?"     

Get read like an open book...
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am

According to R "Eggplant" Suave, the Orange Pedo has certainly fixed the problem of "too many Americans working."

[Though, to be fair, I believe this trend started long before the Orang3 Ped0 took office a 2nd time. The Orange P3do is, however, making the problem worse.]

------------------

So why aren't the wealthy "creating jobs?"       

Isn't the economy BOOMING?

(Fed members, known for erring on caution's divide, believe the jobs "growth" per month is actually around -20K)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/payro ... -year-high


 
 

When necessity is the mother of invention, then why invent something larger than how evolving actually happens? Every lifetime needs to learn what their time alive is does when adapting spontaneously here simultaneously living now.

LowIQTrash » 23 Jan 2026, 3:19 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 3:19 am

At least one retarded azzwipe will, at some point, counter the OP with:

"Well, have you seen any POOR PEOPLE create any jobs?"     

Get read like an open book...

Go ask BV for a job.....you can be his *** istant.

A duo of dunces......you have my permission to use the name on your business cards, Mr. Entremanure.
 
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am

According to R "Eggplant" Suave, the Orange Pedo has certainly fixed the problem of "too many Americans working."

[Though, to be fair, I believe this trend started long before the Orang3 Ped0 took office a 2nd time. The Orange P3do is, however, making the problem worse.]

------------------

So why aren't the wealthy "creating jobs?"       

Isn't the economy BOOMING?

(Fed members, known for erring on caution's divide, believe the jobs "growth" per month is actually around -20K)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/payro ... -year-high

An increase in productivity results in doing more with less employees. Wasn't that in Econ 101?    I wouldn't know as I didn't take the class or go to college. 

It's the new normal.

U.S. labor productivity (nonfarm business sector) has shown a strong, recent surge, growing at an annualized rate of 4.9% in Q3 2025, with a 2.4% increase in the second quarter of 2025. For the current business cycle since late 2019, productivity has increased at a 1.8% annual rate, which is higher than the previous 2007–2019 cycle (1.5%). 
 

RebelGator » 23 Jan 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 8:01 am

Go ask BV for a job.....you can be his *** istant.

A duo of dunces......you have my permission to use the name on your business cards, Mr. Entremanure.

         

https://youtu.be/FfI2iFvloso?si=j69EP-pKLn2TDqWM

Fuelman » 23 Jan 2026, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 9:36 am

An increase in productivity results in doing more with less employees. Wasn't that in Econ 101?    I wouldn't know as I didn't take the class or go to college. 

It's the new normal.

U.S. labor productivity (nonfarm business sector) has shown a strong, recent surge, growing at an annualized rate of 4.9% in Q3 2025, with a 2.4% increase in the second quarter of 2025. For the current business cycle since late 2019, productivity has increased at a 1.8% annual rate, which is higher than the previous 2007–2019 cycle (1.5%).

Well, I DID take econ 101, and it told me that better productivity = more profits = more job creation by the wealthy. 

So the OP is correct to smirk and sneer at anyone dumb enough to believe that, since it is manifestly false. 

As false as my claim to have taken econ 101, but I lied for truthful reasons. 
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:18 pm

Well, I DID take econ 101, and it told me that better productivity = more profits = more job creation by the wealthy. 

So the OP is correct to smirk and sneer at anyone dumb enough to believe that, since it is manifestly false. 

As false as my claim to have taken econ 101, but I lied for truthful reasons.

They should probably rewrite the text books to say:

Better productivity=more profits=more money to shareholders. (Or a new yacht for the owner)

AI is going to have an impact on labor, how that washes out might not be pretty.
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am

According to R "Eggplant" Suave, the Orange Pedo has certainly fixed the problem of "too many Americans working."

[Though, to be fair, I believe this trend started long before the Orang3 Ped0 took office a 2nd time. The Orange P3do is, however, making the problem worse.]

------------------

So why aren't the wealthy "creating jobs?"       

Isn't the economy BOOMING?

(Fed members, known for erring on caution's divide, believe the jobs "growth" per month is actually around -20K)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/payro ... -year-high

So even when the job totals for the month far exceeded the 50,000 new jobs that were predicted by the "experts", AND payrolls (which means wages) have increased by $69,000, AND our 3rd quarter GDP increased at a 'blistering" pace of 4.3%, you stupid liberals STILL think Trump's economic policies are "making the problem worse", huh?

U.S. GDP grew at a blistering 4.3% pace in the third quarter
CBS News By Mary Cunningham December 23, 2025 

The U.S. economy grew at a robust 4.3% annual pace in the third quarter, marking the strongest growth in two years, according to new government data released Tuesday.

The growth in gross domestic product — the nation's output of goods and services — between July and September far outstripped the forecast for 3% growth, according to economists polled by financial data firm FactSet. The latest figure, released by the Commerce Department, also reflects a healthy jump from the second quarter's annualized growth of 3.8%.

Both you and CP would do well with an introductory course in Economics 101.  At least he ADMITS he has no education whatsoever in the subject.

Let's see if you've got the balls to applaud THAT, Chicken Little!
 

Fuelman » 23 Jan 2026, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:39 pm

They should probably rewrite the text books to say:

Better productivity=more profits=more money to shareholders. (Or a new yacht for the owner)

AI is going to have an impact on labor, how that washes out might not be pretty.

We live in a world of extreme bounty, created by a loving God. The Prime Architect got it right. 

Poverty is a result of crimes against humanity. And it is not as often self-inflicted as people believe.
 
 

Zeets2 » 23 Jan 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:41 pm

So even when the job totals for the month far exceeded the 50,000 new jobs that were predicted by the "experts", AND payrolls (which means wages) have increased by $69,000, AND our 3rd quarter GDP increased at a 'blistering" pace of 4.3%, you stupid liberals STILL think Trump's economic policies are "making the problem worse", huh?

Both you and CP would do well with an introductory course in Economics 101.  At least he ADMITS he has no education whatsoever in the subject.

Let's see if you've got the balls to applaud THAT, Chicken Little!

Please quickly don't be a gay retard. 

HURRY!
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am

According to R "Eggplant" Suave, the Orange Pedo has certainly fixed the problem of "too many Americans working."

[Though, to be fair, I believe this trend started long before the Orang3 Ped0 took office a 2nd time. The Orange P3do is, however, making the problem worse.]

------------------

So why aren't the wealthy "creating jobs?"       

Isn't the economy BOOMING?

(Fed members, known for erring on caution's divide, believe the jobs "growth" per month is actually around -20K)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/payro ... -year-high

Many of them are job creators, you lying
​​​​​​bitch.

Fuelman » 23 Jan 2026, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:39 pm

They should probably rewrite the text books to say:

Better productivity=more profits=more money to shareholders. (Or a new yacht for the owner)

AI is going to have an impact on labor, how that washes out might not be pretty.

What's the problem with more money to shareholders??

When people INVEST in companies, that means companies are profitable AND people are working. MOST LIKELY that same company is expanding and growing, which means more jobs, better paying jobs, and other benefits you seem to not like too much.

Pretty much any company experiencing growth, pays higher wages in order to attract more workers needed to expand, existing workers seeing promotions into higher paying jobs to train new workers and manage operations. 

What you don't seem to understand is that wealthy people INVEST their funds and that creates more $$ for companies to grow and expand. When shareholders get paid, that's the reward for allowing YOUR MONEY to be used for POTENTIAL profits.

Since you hate that, give up your retirement and 401K plan. Because that's ALSO being used to fund more companies growth and to PAY TOUR PLAN FOR YOUR BENEFIT!!

 

murdock » 23 Jan 2026, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 3:31 pm

Many of them are job creators, you lying
​​​​​​bitch.

ANYONE that invests in the market (stocks, bonds, etc) are in effect JOB CREATORS because even if they might be 3rd party to the company, they still have funds invested in the success of those companies. They succeed with GROWTH because of those funds.

Tell those with 401K's that they contribute to ALSO brings funds for growth and success. MAYBE we need to stop those "evil working class" from doing that too, huh??
 

LowIQTrash » 23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 2:43 am

According to R "Eggplant" Suave, the Orange Pedo has certainly fixed the problem of "too many Americans working."

[Though, to be fair, I believe this trend started long before the Orang3 Ped0 took office a 2nd time. The Orange P3do is, however, making the problem worse.]

------------------

So why aren't the wealthy "creating jobs?"       

Isn't the economy BOOMING?

(Fed members, known for erring on caution's divide, believe the jobs "growth" per month is actually around -20K)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/payro ... -year-high

Juvenile lying ****.

Beekeeper » 23 Jan 2026, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 6:11 pm

Fuelman » 23 Jan 2026, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:39 pm

They should probably rewrite the text books to say:

Better productivity=more profits=more money to shareholders. (Or a new yacht for the owner)

AI is going to have an impact on labor, how that washes out might not be pretty.

What's the problem with more money to shareholders??

When people INVEST in companies, that means companies are profitable AND people are working. MOST LIKELY that same company is expanding and growing, which means more jobs, better paying jobs, and other benefits you seem to not like too much.

Pretty much any company experiencing growth, pays higher wages in order to attract more workers needed to expand, existing workers seeing promotions into higher paying jobs to train new workers and manage operations. 

What you don't seem to understand is that wealthy people INVEST their funds and that creates more $$ for companies to grow and expand. When shareholders get paid, that's the reward for allowing YOUR MONEY to be used for POTENTIAL profits.

Since you hate that, give up your retirement and 401K plan. Because that's ALSO being used to fund more companies growth and to PAY TOUR PLAN FOR YOUR BENEFIT!!

Look, EVERYBODY with a brain understands that there is going to be SOME "friendly fire" in this world.

But that simply does not excuse retards having guns.

Consider a lobotomy.
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:18 pm

So the OP is correct to smirk and sneer at anyone dumb enough to believe that
 

I would need anoth3r 10 lifetimes to smirk and sneer at every1 dumb enough to believe that 

Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2026, 1:18 pm

Well, I DID take econ 101, and it told me that better productivity = more profits = more job creation by the wealthy. 

So the OP is correct to smirk and sneer at anyone dumb enough to believe that, since it is manifestly false. 

As false as my claim to have taken econ 101, but I lied for truthful reasons.

Well, when you get to Econ 8686, you'll learn about how we just print wealth and rich poops horde it.