Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » 28 Jan 2026, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:19 am

Psssst. ****. Zeets denies MAN-MADE "****" warming. So do I.

Nice try in obfuscating the FACTS, but we all can read and see TRUTH.

Keep clutching your pearls. It's all you have in reality.

JohnnyYou » 28 Jan 2026, 4:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 4:30 am

Total carbon emissions are in excess of 35 GT a year.

Yes, total annual global carbon dioxide (\(CO_{2}\)) emissions are in excess of 35 gigatonnes (Gt) per year, with recent data indicating they have surpassed 37–38 Gt \(CO_{2}\) annually from fossil fuels and industry alone. Key facts regarding global carbon emissions: 2024/2025 Levels: Global \(CO_{2}\) emissions from fossil fuels and industry are projected to reach a record high of 38.1 billion tonnes (Gt) in 2025, following a record of 37.4 Gt in 2024.Total \(CO_{2}\) (Including Land Use): When accounting for emissions from land-use changes (such as deforestation), the total \(CO_{2}\) output is even higher, estimated at approximately 42.2 Gt in 2025.Record Highs: Despite international climate goals, fossil fuel emissions have continued to rise, recently growing by 1.1% in 2025.Components of Emissions: The majority of these emissions come from coal (roughly 42%), followed by oil (33%) and gas (21%). The Earth naturally absorbs about half of these emissions, but the remaining amount continues to accumulate in the atmosphere, driving up temperatures.

Sorry, I was responding to every lie that followed.

The earth is starved for atmospheric carbon. We are growing vegetables in artifical environments. 
 

*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2026, 6:43 pm

Oh hell yes, Climate Change

 take a look 

Dynamic - (of a process or system) characterized by constant change, activity, or progress.
 
Don't deny Climate Change
 

or deny it and look like a really GAY person like Zeets2
 I told you so  [

Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****.

What kinetic causes climate change in the atmosphere of this universal location proportionately existing in a current perpetual balancing situation?

A spherical planet staying same position revolving around 3rd from a spherical star for intellectual guessimations of 5 billion years in science fiction theories used for 350 generation gaps lived since intellectual dawn of civilization so far.

Two spheres one a million 109 times larger than the 3rd planet from the core of the solar system people talk about the sun rising over the planet facing the core of the solar system, not the universe beyond it at night half of each rotation done 365.2422 times northern winter solstice to northern winter solstice but humanity charts it differently mathematically as factual relative chronological time measuring cycle of life each generation gaps lived and alive for the time each inhabiting space, past, current events, future possible outcomes if everyone obeys power of suggestion or else.

That "or else" is tyranny regardless governed by a dictator or democracy of ancestral lineages agreeing to disagree how evolving actually happens in plain sight.

JohnnyYou » 28 Jan 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:09 am

We Noem what you mean loser..

What makes you a winner?   
 

MR-7 » 28 Jan 2026, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:30 am

What makes you a winner?  :rofl:  
 

Understanding my time alive when everyone else chooses to believe nobody factually can with their own brain. Social minds follow predetermined contextual outcomes adapting uniquely alive now believing social consensus changes what they were since a fertilized cell's natural time alive so far.

MR-7 » 28 Jan 2026, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:30 am

What makes you a winner? 

Recognizing that victory is difficult to achieve, and the best wins have no losers.
It's a little altruistic but hey,.  it's the software that was installed in me at indoctrination in the beltway bubble.
 

JohnnyYou » 28 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:54 am

Recognizing that victory is difficult to achieve, and the best wins have no losers.
It's a little altruistic but hey,.  it's the software that was installed in me at indoctrination in the beltway bubble.

                    Here is your participation trophy loser.

 
 

Beekeeper » 28 Jan 2026, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:19 am

Psssst. ****. Zeets denies MAN-MADE "****" warming. So do I.

Nice try in obfuscating the FACTS, but we all can read and see TRUTH.

Keep clutching your pearls. It's all you have in reality.

That's how liberals try to obfuscate the subject. 
They take a claim that's been made and convert it into something completely different, then attack a person for stating something that THEY intentionally misinterpreted.

Liberals do the same with illegal immigration.  Once you claim you support Trump for deporting ILLEGAL aliens, they lie about it and reply that you're against ALL immigration, pretending that they're actually more ignorant than they are while promoting their own lies!

Thanks for the defense!
 

Zeets2 » 28 Jan 2026, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 10:35 am

That's how liberals try to obfuscate the subject. 
They take a claim that's been made and convert it into something completely different, then attack a person for stating something that THEY intentionally misinterpreted.

Liberals do the same with illegal immigration.  Once you claim you support Trump for deporting ILLEGAL aliens, they lie about it and reply that you're against ALL immigration, pretending that they're actually more ignorant than they are while promoting their own lies!

Thanks for the defense!

When their lips are moving, you can bet that there's a LIE in there that anyone with more than 2 brain cells can see.

JohnnyYou » 28 Jan 2026, 1:59 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 1:59 am

Total carbon emissions are in excess of 35 GT a year.   Earth maintained CO2 under 400 PPM for 800,000 years with Forest Fires at 2 GT a year and Volcanoes at 1 GT a year.  Humans are anthrpogenically changing the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.  Every graph is on an exponential slope to hell.

it is all what trump says. trump said it was a hoax then a couple of days ago he said it was not a hoax. now they are saying anything but pollution causes it. trump science is all they believe

MR-7 » 28 Jan 2026, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:30 am

What makes you a winner? 

having the noble prize winner giving her medal to trump made after he threw a fit.      

jerrab » 28 Jan 2026, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 12:31 pm

it is all what trump says. trump said it was a hoax then a couple of days ago he said it was not a hoax. now they are saying anything but pollution causes it. trump science is all they believe

I just heard a short of Rubio's hearing yesterday..  Oil is the Lifeline for economic success from their perspective. They are going to fry the  planet like an egg on drugs in a pan.  Get a Space Suit Jerra.  Hopefully our robots will do the grocery shopping and we won't have to go outdoors.

I am not throwing in the environmental towel. But the concept of sustainability continues to be unsustainable.  There is movement toward Nuclear Power in Delaware. They are keen on small modular reactors. It's a better lifeline than to pursue than combustion of fossil fuel from my perspective. Oil may be more convenient and cheaper, but the short term gain will yield very severe long term consequences. 

It would be good if people could get on the same page. I mean China still uses R22 Refrigerant and Al Gore banned it in the 1970's.  My job that just ended uses liquid CO2, R744. Completely harmless (at 40,000 ppm or less, above is lethal), and sustainable (except for the fact liquid CO2 comes from burning oil currently).

Trump has us on the Drill Bay Drill, Burn Baby Burn road. COVID forced Joe to take it for the recovery and to serve European Markets.  The fracking, liquefying and shipment of Natural Gas to Europe for combustion in power plants to charge electric vehicles has a Godzillaa Carbon Footprint. But it keeps Russia isolated.  AI needs three times the electricity of Humanity.  Our congress people pursue transgenders in sports and real important shyt...

 
 

Johnny You » 29 Jan 2026, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 5:22 am

I just heard a short of Rubio's hearing yesterday..  Oil is the Lifeline for economic success from their perspective. They are going to fry the  planet like an egg on drugs in a pan.  Get a Space Suit Jerra.  Hopefully our robots will do the grocery shopping and we won't have to go outdoors.

I am not throwing in the environmental towel. But the concept of sustainability continues to be unsustainable.  There is movement toward Nuclear Power in Delaware. They are keen on small modular reactors. It's a better lifeline than to pursue than combustion of fossil fuel from my perspective. Oil may be more convenient and cheaper, but the short term gain will yield very severe long term consequences. 

It would be good if people could get on the same page. I mean China still uses R22 Refrigerant and Al Gore banned it in the 1970's.  My job that just ended uses liquid CO2, R744. Completely harmless (at 40,000 ppm or less, above is lethal), and sustainable (except for the fact liquid CO2 comes from burning oil currently).

Trump has us on the Drill Bay Drill, Burn Baby Burn road. COVID forced Joe to take it for the recovery and to serve European Markets.  The fracking, liquefying and shipment of Natural Gas to Europe for combustion in power plants to charge electric vehicles has a Godzillaa Carbon Footprint. But it keeps Russia isolated.  AI needs three times the electricity of Humanity.  Our congress people pursue transgenders in sports and real important shyt...

 
 

Oil is organic matter inverted back into inorganic compounds. Zero sum gain of total changes happened at this universal perpetually balancing point of displacement. Evolving never stays same details twice what does exist now is never same results again as individually displaced between molecular characteristics of the periodic table to chromosomes of each human ancestor inhabiting time daily here.

DNA is the streaming numbers (8.3 billion)present and you are 1 of them same as I am. Equality since created in plain sight displacement adapting in space at the same time separately. You really have to comprehend thermodynamic principles.

*31stArrival » 29 Jan 2026, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 6:54 am

Oil is organic matter inverted back into inorganic compounds. Zero sum gain of total changes happened at this universal perpetually balancing point of displacement. Evolving never stays same details twice what does exist now is never same results again as individually displaced between molecular characteristics of the periodic table to chromosomes of each human ancestor inhabiting time daily here.

DNA is the streaming numbers (8.3 billion)present and you are 1 of them same as I am. Equality since created in plain sight displacement adapting in space at the same time separately. You really have to comprehend thermodynamic principles.

I have a Dinosaur Egg for sale..  Layed Once, Never opened..   Kind of like your parachute.

Johnny You » 29 Jan 2026, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 7:14 am

I have a Dinosaur Egg for sale..  Layed Once, Never opened..   Kind of like your parachute.

Sit on it, maybe it will hatch. Keep your faith anything is possible, that belief never worked out for me.

*31stArrival » 29 Jan 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 7:18 am

Sit on it, maybe it will hatch. Keep your faith anything is possible, that belief never worked out for me.

The Sole Results are getting a little more relevant and poignant..  Kind of like a syringe full of apple cider vinegar..

Might as Well Jump!  With Trump and a defective parachute!

youtu.be/SwYN7mTi6HM?si=WBUQbu3ztl8K0GZW[TROLL WITH THE PUNCHES IN DUT CUM]

 
 

Johnny You » 29 Jan 2026, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 7:27 am

The Sole Results are getting a little more relevant and poignant..  Kind of like a syringe full of apple cider vinegar..

Might as Well Jump!  With Trump and a defective parachute!

youtu.be/SwYN7mTi6HM?si=WBUQbu3ztl8K0GZW[TROLL WITH THE PUNCHES IN DUT CUM]

 
 

Humanity directs how I have to behave socially every heartbeat alive through economic tomorrows as people believe life is more than adapting since conceived.

Persons directing people by reasonable doubt are a minority of less than 1% of the human population alive daily here but they have around a 9% population to believe anything else is possible enforcing rule of law typecasting their own ancestral lineage living forward now each generation gap educated to believe life exceeds adapting forward so far.

you are one of those ancestors between 2-9%. I am imploding your reasonable doubt about evolving in real time and plain sight using the world wide web.

Johnny You » 28 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2026, 8:54 am

Recognizing that victory is difficult to achieve, and the best wins have no losers.
It's a little altruistic but hey,.  it's the software that was installed in me at indoctrination in the beltway bubble.
 

Chromosomes are the software to hardwired DNA strands passed along generations within specific ancestral lineages combined so far as current numbers live in plain sight.

JohnnyYou » 29 Jan 2026, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 5:22 am

I just heard a short of Rubio's hearing yesterday..  Oil is the Lifeline for economic success from their perspective. They are going to fry the  planet like an egg on drugs in a pan.  Get a Space Suit Jerra.  Hopefully our robots will do the grocery shopping and we won't have to go outdoors.

I am not throwing in the environmental towel. But the concept of sustainability continues to be unsustainable.  There is movement toward Nuclear Power in Delaware. They are keen on small modular reactors. It's a better lifeline than to pursue than combustion of fossil fuel from my perspective. Oil may be more convenient and cheaper, but the short term gain will yield very severe long term consequences. 

It would be good if people could get on the same page. I mean China still uses R22 Refrigerant and Al Gore banned it in the 1970's.  My job that just ended uses liquid CO2, R744. Completely harmless (at 40,000 ppm or less, above is lethal), and sustainable (except for the fact liquid CO2 comes from burning oil currently).

Trump has us on the Drill Bay Drill, Burn Baby Burn road. COVID forced Joe to take it for the recovery and to serve European Markets.  The fracking, liquefying and shipment of Natural Gas to Europe for combustion in power plants to charge electric vehicles has a Godzillaa Carbon Footprint. But it keeps Russia isolated.  AI needs three times the electricity of Humanity.  Our congress people pursue transgenders in sports and real important shyt...

-------------------------------------------


Based on natural orbital cycles, the next ice age is projected to begin in approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years. However, this natural cycle is likely to be delayed or cancelled due to current high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, which are heating the planet and preventing the conditions needed for glacier formation. 

• Natural Cycle: Earth's ice ages are driven by predictable, long-term orbital shifts (Milankovitch cycles), with a new glacial period usually starting every ~100,000 years.

jerrab » 30 Jan 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 9:45 am

-------------------------------------------

Based on natural orbital cycles, the next ice age is projected to begin in approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years. However, this natural cycle is likely to be delayed or cancelled due to current high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, which are heating the planet and preventing the conditions needed for glacier formation. 

• Natural Cycle: Earth's ice ages are driven by predictable, long-term orbital shifts (Milankovitch cycles), with a new glacial period usually starting every ~100,000 years.

ME: Copilot, is the above factual?

“The timeline in your post is busted. The last glacial period ended ~11,700 years ago, not 90,000 (UC Santa Barbara, 2025). Milankovitch cycles aren’t a 100k‑year kitchen timer — modern modeling shows they’re irregular and complex (Ganopolski 2024). The old ‘next ice age in 10–11k years’ estimate has been replaced by research showing the next natural glaciation is ~50,000 years out (Berger & Loutre, Science, 2002). And CO₂ doesn’t ‘cancel’ ice ages — it delays them by tens of thousands of years (New Scientist, 2025). The 1970s ice‑age scare wasn’t scientific consensus either — only 7 papers predicted cooling vs 44 predicting warming (Peterson et al., 2008).” Your post is basically a mash‑up of old numbers, wrong dates, and a cartoon version of orbital physics.

Jeeze, jerra, if you’re going to lecture the forum about ice ages, at least start with a timeline that isn’t off by an entire epoch. No different then your phony **** bible lecturing.