What does it mean, climate change? So many people use that phrase to mean one thing or another. The phrase itself, denotatively, just means that the climate is changing. But some people, when they use that, attach connotative meanings. They might mean that oil compamnies are evil. They might mean that we all need to drive a prius and sniff our own farts. They might ONCE have meant we need to drive Teslas, and now that we need to NOT drive Teslas.*Roshambo » 23 Jan 2026, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ climate change
Predicted as worst storm in 40 years
Some say the worst President in last 40 years (not me though)
Do as you please with those statements.
Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****.


The climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2026, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ What does it mean, climate change? So many people use that phrase to mean one thing or another. The phrase itself, denotatively, just means that the climate is changing. But some people, when they use that, attach connotative meanings. They might mean that oil compamnies are evil. They might mean that we all need to drive a prius and sniff our own farts. They might ONCE have meant we need to drive Teslas, and now that we need to NOT drive Teslas.
And they might mean that we need an autistic swedish teenager to decide our environmental policies by hyper-moral fiat.
If, by "climate change," you mean that a retarded swedish autist should be writing our environmental policies, I deny climate change.
If, by "climate change," you mean that the US should spend trillions in the coming decades to pretend we are combatting carbon while actually offshoring it, I deny climate change.
If, by "climate change," you mean that C02 is a terribly dangerous and volatile trace gas that is a much more powerful greenhouse gas than water vapor, I deny climate change.
When you say, "Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****," you need to tell us what that phrase means when you speak it. Because it means a lot of different things to a lot of different people.
I can tell you this: I have done as deep a dive into the peer reviewed literature as an interested non-scientist can. And what I discovered is that the science has been truly politicized. Science has always and forever been a whore. Corrupting it is nothing new. When Britain ran us, coffee would make your sons indolent (gay) and your daughters licentious (hooers). That was the science. And that science served the british east india company's tea monopoly quite well. In the dutch colonies, the science around coffee and tea was precisely inverted.
But as corrupted as science is, there is very, very little science that supports what MOST people mean when they say climate change. There is alot of high volume reportage, but the articles linked to that reportage donot say what is claimed by the reportage. It's just that very few people click the links. Folks are lazy. And the fact that this truth is little known does not make it any less true. It just makes it little known.
And there is little excuse for people continuing to treat it as a religion, as debunked as its precepts have been over the decades of hysteria. Florida is not under water. 50 million climate refugees are not washing up on our shores. Sea levels have not risen by meters, but by millimeters. And the promised heat wave - yes, a heat wave was emphatically and fanatically promised - never happened, no matter HOW much Algorians had fun with numbers.
So... what do you mean by climate change? I am likely your huckleberry.
No catalytic convertors on my winter vehicles, report me, I dare you.DeezerShoove » 23 Jan 2026, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ It's the environmentalists that are acting the fool.
Of course the **** weather changes and trends go through cycles...
Holy ****!
To finally notice this natural and continuous occurrence is one thing, but to insanely panic about it is **** up.
And then to weep and gnash teeth about the people who do NOT panic is doubly **** up.
And you seem to be acknowledging that they are right to live a life of doom and that everyone should join them.
Now, this is where you call me complicit in the poisoning of the earth because I'm not in the battle properly.
Of course, you would be wrong about my opinions on it but I gave up talking to nuts.
It's like trying to convince an alcoholic to quit drinking while he's drunk.
You guys "know what you know" and that's the end of it.
Even Global Warming gets a vacation now and then..MR-7 » 23 Jan 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ "Record Cold Wave expected to hit 40 States. Rarely seen anything like it before. Could the Environmental Insurrectionists please explain - WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GLOBAL WARMING???"![]()
no spam
He has a valid point. This warming of the earth has a lot more people buying generators. And many are and will be freezing to death because of the earth's warming. Just doesn't seem right, does it?
Humanity burns 1.47 trillion gallons of liquid hydrocarbons a year. That's 181 gallons each for 8.1 Billion souls. It sounds a reasonable number.
What does it mean, climate change? So many people use that phrase to mean one thing or another. The phrase itself, denotatively, just means that the climate is changing. But some people, when they use that, attach connotative meanings. They might mean that oil compamnies are evil. They might mean that we all need to drive a prius and sniff our own farts. They might ONCE have meant we need to drive Teslas, and now that we need to NOT drive Teslas.
And they might mean that we need an autistic swedish teenager to decide our environmental policies by hyper-moral fiat.
If, by "climate change," you mean that a retarded swedish autist should be writing our environmental policies, I deny climate change.
If, by "climate change," you mean that the US should spend trillions in the coming decades to pretend we are combatting carbon while actually offshoring it, I deny climate change.
If, by "climate change," you mean that C02 is a terribly dangerous and volatile trace gas that is a much more powerful greenhouse gas than water vapor, I deny climate change.
When you say, "Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****," you need to tell us what that phrase means when you speak it. Because it means a lot of different things to a lot of different people.
I can tell you this: I have done as deep a dive into the peer reviewed literature as an interested non-scientist can. And what I discovered is that the science has been truly politicized. Science has always and forever been a whore. Corrupting it is nothing new. When Britain ran us, coffee would make your sons indolent (gay) and your daughters licentious (hooers). That was the science. And that science served the british east india company's tea monopoly quite well. In the dutch colonies, the science around coffee and tea was precisely inverted.
But as corrupted as science is, there is very, very little science that supports what MOST people mean when they say climate change. There is alot of high volume reportage, but the articles linked to that reportage donot say what is claimed by the reportage. It's just that very few people click the links. Folks are lazy. And the fact that this truth is little known does not make it any less true. It just makes it little known.
And there is little excuse for people continuing to treat it as a religion, as debunked as its precepts have been over the decades of hysteria. Florida is not under water. 50 million climate refugees are not washing up on our shores. Sea levels have not risen by meters, but by millimeters. And the promised heat wave - yes, a heat wave was emphatically and fanatically promised - never happened, no matter HOW much Algorians had fun with numbers.
So... what do you mean by climate change? I am likely your huckleberry.
Did they get stolen?*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ No catalytic convertors on my winter vehicles, report me, I dare you.
*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ No catalytic convertors on my winter vehicles, report me, I dare you.
*Roshambo » 23 Jan 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ Reject the reality of climate change, and demonstrate to the internet that you are a dumb ****; however, this is information we were already aware of.
Your Husky has mud on his helmet...
https://i.postimg.cc/CKkjtYLX/GAUGE.jpg
Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****.*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 5:31 am » wrote: ↑ The climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.
Explain how the climate changes is far better than debating how mankind can control it.Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****.
Through osmisis - that's how, moving forward six generations to depose the critical unthinking skills of previous generations here now.*31stArrival » 24 Jan 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ Explain how the climate changes is far better than debating how mankind can control it.
Do you know what honesty absent of hope, faith, charity, tomorrow, power, wealth, fame, mayhem, madness, misery comes to those never accepting all they been since a fertilized cell does to one's brain navigating time alive here leads one away from everyone honoring reasonable doubt cradle to grave?*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 5:31 am » wrote: ↑ The climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.
The climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Deny climate change, show the internet you are a dumb ****.
There might be nothing that I, as an individual can do.*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ The climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.
But but but. No, the climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2026, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ There might be nothing that I, as an individual can do.
But if I team up with Chuck Norris, I can make the climate my bitch.
Not alone.*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ But but but. No, the climate is changing and there is nothing you can do to stop it.
Chuck Norris got beat many times. You and Chuck will get beat every time.Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Not alone.
And not with all of humanity helping.
But with one man named Chuck Norris, yes. I can.
Nobody wins defying all each has been, since a fertilized cell. Lost souls praying for better tomorrows haven't corrected their own ancestral mistakes.*Roshambo » 24 Jan 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Chuck Norris got beat many times. You and Chuck will get beat every time. :ninja:
Fertilize this*31stArrival » 24 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody wins defying all each has been, since a fertilized cell.