There is not one bit of evidence in that pile of tripe supporting your "multiple designs" theory.Huey » 30 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you wish to do this here....
These are questions that sealed your defeat a long time ago. You ran from them. The links are to the article in your quote above that I posted to you quite some time ago. An article you never read past couple of sentences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models
And the civilian models:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models
Here is the challenge again:
Now, to end this.
1. Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in. Military or civilian.
Answer. The Colt Sporter and IT'S variants is the AR 15 mentioned at the beginning of the article I gave you. It a semi automatic rifle with a different design for civilians and law enforcement. It is a one trigger squeeze/on shot rifle. It is on the civilian list because it was not designed for the battlefield. It was designed so that M16 parts could not swapped into the weapon to make a select fire rifle.
2. Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.
Answer. The AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle (Sporter) was NEVER standard issue in the military to infantry to be carried into battle.
It has been fun revisiting this. What is I posted is fact and supported by the source I gave you.
Here is your L.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is not one bit of evidence in that pile of tripe supporting your "multiple designs" theory.
dewut?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Last year it was crypto, the year before, robotics...Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Mine is AI dumb ****. Can you not read?
And just copy/pasting **** won't work. You need to have thoughts of your own.
Agree?
Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Last year it was crypto, the year before, robotics...
You suck at many things...
Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Mine is AI dumb ****. Can you not read?
And just copy/pasting **** won't work. You need to have thoughts of your own.
Agree?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom refute it brown...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[24] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[25][better source needed] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire componentsBlackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is not one bit of evidence in that pile of tripe supporting your "multiple designs" theory.
Refute what, exactly?ROG62 » 30 Jan 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ refute it brown...
BTW, no information was added to sway and it did positively identify Cohn...
Projecting. Again.
Anyway, back to normal. Here you go:Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Vegas kicked my *** again. I am one dumb piece of ****.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Glad you asked. You are at 94.1%.
You were yapping?
94.1% ^^^ You just hid again. God man. Seriously.
I just ran yours..Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ 94.1% ^^^ You just hid again. God man. Seriously.
QED
1. Continue to prove me right.