Liberal Forum

Over the past decade, there have been a little over 20k congressional hearings. The purpose includes anything from governance oversight, national security, to BV embezzling money from his mom's gloryhole business. 

The amount of follow up that led to any accountability from these 20k hearings is less than 10. 


These hearings are a show for the people. They are used to keep the mass happy. To make them think that the government is indeed for the people. It's for TikTokers and Youtubers to take clips and title them "so and so wipes the floor at the whatever hearing..." etc...It gets clicks, likes, and rage comments. Thousands of them. 


Just another example of how useless our government is...and how stupid Americans are.

Post of the day nom by CP the ruler and gone..



youtu.be/hJ5IF9D80kM?si=eZb44-DZnCmIGxWe

Tea Party.. In Israel..

youtu.be/CdodFmp1wrI?si=T2N45_u--SQEmywO

Cannonpointer makes my asthma work up..
 

Black Dude's can Jazz


youtu.be/bGzOPSBSZi8?si=_JCAHNyEGPmiJpvw[insert dat uggha *** dat cum]


CP suggested this therapy Shoove

JohnnyYou » 29 Jan 2026, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 7:45 pm

Over the past decade, there have been a little over 20k congressional hearings. The purpose includes anything from governance oversight, national security, to BV embezzling money from his mom's gloryhole business. 

The amount of follow up that led to any accountability from these 20k hearings is less than 10. 

These hearings are a show for the people. They are used to keep the mass happy. To make them think that the government is indeed for the people. It's for TikTokers and Youtubers to take clips and title them "so and so wipes the floor at the whatever hearing..." etc...It gets clicks, likes, and rage comments. Thousands of them. 

Just another example of how useless our government is...and how stupid Americans are.

Post of the day nom by CP the ruler and gone..

youtu.be/hJ5IF9D80kM?si=eZb44-DZnCmIGxWe

You just copied my OP. Am I missing something?

Vegas » 29 Jan 2026, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 8:03 pm

You just copied my OP. Am I missing something?

The Bar called ..   You forgot your detachable penis again.


youtu.be/Pp392Nk_2vw?si=Bt_9LbSQe0lB9j2m[CAUTION]

Black Vegetableanism..

youtu.be/8qrriKcwvlY?si=71vlOTyEHCICwI6G
 

JohnnyYou » 29 Jan 2026, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2026, 7:45 pm

Over the past decade, there have been a little over 20k congressional hearings. The purpose includes anything from governance oversight, national security, to BV embezzling money from his mom's gloryhole business. 

The amount of follow up that led to any accountability from these 20k hearings is less than 10. 

These hearings are a show for the people. They are used to keep the mass happy. To make them think that the government is indeed for the people. It's for TikTokers and Youtubers to take clips and title them "so and so wipes the floor at the whatever hearing..." etc...It gets clicks, likes, and rage comments. Thousands of them. 

Just another example of how useless our government is...and how stupid Americans are.

Post of the day nom by CP the ruler and gone..

youtu.be/hJ5IF9D80kM?si=eZb44-DZnCmIGxWe

@Vegas  is such a dumb piece of ****.....

Another pathetic attempt at "thought"

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 8:00 am

@Vegas  is such a dumb piece of ****.....

Another pathetic attempt at "thought"

Yet, you cannot refute a word of it. Just like my media comment. 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 9:58 am

Yet, you cannot refute a word of it. Just like my media comment.

LOTS...


:rofl:  

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:02 am

LOTS...

Not once. 

   
 
 
 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:05 am

Not once. 

 

Just showed you.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:06 am

Just showed you.

By saying LOTS?           

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:07 am

By saying LOTS?         

Bloom's Taxonomy.hates you more than AI does...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:11 am

Bloom's Taxonomy.hates you more than AI does...

Man, I really made you envious and bitter, didn't I? 

Look, my field is AI. That is why I keep kicking your ***.


@Huey  kicks your *** with the gun debate and I kick your *** with the AI discussions. 

How about instead of whining, you just do better?

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:13 am

Man, I really made you envious and bitter, didn't I? 

Look, my field is AI. That is why I keep kicking your ***.

@Huey  kicks your *** with the gun debate and I kick your *** with the AI discussions. 

How about instead of whining, you just do better?

:rofl:  


Are you a professional LOTS baseline?

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:18 am

 

Are you a professional LOTS baseline?

I present to you, exhibit A: 


My prompt: 

Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."

AI's reply:

AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.”
 That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. 

This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:19 am

I present to you, exhibit A: 

My prompt: 

AI's reply:

This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.

without external verification?

AI used "external verification", not facial recognition, to confirm the attribution.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:23 am

AI used "external verification", not facial recognition, to confirm the attribution.

And here we have exhibit B:

Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.

Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background.
 At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.

 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 10:23 am

And here we have exhibit B:

You are asking AI if the photo is a selfie.

Because you are too stupid to sweat unsupervised.