Liberal Forum

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:13 pm

And did you make that claim on your own, then backed it up with your source? 

If so, post it. Post your original claim. 

1. Same ****

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:16 pm

Yes, you dumb ****.

For years.

Why aren't you dead?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:17 pm

Post it.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 12:58 pm

This is Fact..

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:19 pm

Don't be stupid...it predates the archive purge.

Why do you think @*TinyVictim is so hysterical about it?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 30 Jan 2026, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:20 pm

Shrug.  It's over.  You lost.  Again.

It will be evidence based. You have to provide you own evidence. 

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:20 pm

So nothing. You got nothing. 

Start posting your own thoughts, coward. Now.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:22 pm

I prove I do so and you leave for 2 years.

Deal?

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:24 pm

This first. As always, 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm

So you are saying that you're a lying coward...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm

Why do narcissists, like BV aka Dartn Evader, aka Askholio, aka disgusting excuse for a human being, consistently misunderstand AI?

  My theory. Unlike Veghead, I will provide thoughts of my own. No copy/pasting from the internet.

: AI requires three traits narcissism actively neglects...because they are pitiful scum.

1. Listening
   AI improves by ingesting feedback. Narcissists interpret feedback as an insult, a conspiracy, or proof that everyone else is stupid. This sounds familiar to anyone who has even engaged BV in anything. 
2. Error correction
   AI gets better by being wrong publicly and updating. Narcissists get better by never being wrong, ever, even retroactively. As you all know, I receive much joy in embarrassing BV publicly...like now.
3. Epistemic humility
   AI works because it knows it doesn’t “know”,  it models uncertainty. Narcissists already know everything, especially things they learned 12 minutes ago on YouTube.

This leads to a predictable outcome:

• The morons think AI agrees with them.
• The morons think prompting is domination, not collaboration
• The morons believe disagreement means bias, not probability or even certainty. 
• And the morons explain AI with supreme confidence while being wrong at a statistically impressive level.

In short:
AI is iterative. Narcissism is declarative.
AI learns. Narcissists proclaim.
AI updates. Narcissists double down. But I’m open to counterarguments, preferably ones that don’t begin with “Actually…” and end with total certainty.

@Blackvegetable  You're up. Remember, your thoughts along with copy/pasted ****. Otherwise, you fail again.

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:26 pm

Nope. You are calling yourself one. Here is the proof:

Deal:

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:29 pm

Do you want to see me tear this from your rhetorical uterus and beat it insensate - with your own words?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:29 pm

That's more narrative.

It is not proof.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:30 pm

Welll *******. That is the point of all this. YOUR WORDS ONLY!

And "this is ****" or "You are a **** moron" is not level 2+. 

Loser.

Vegas » 30 Jan 2026, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:31 pm

No narrative. You claimed you answered the survivorship bias question. I am giving you a chance to prove it. 

You run from it daily (literally.).

Mrkelly » 30 Jan 2026, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:36 pm

I wonder what AI says about why a narcissist can’t let something go

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:40 pm

@Vegas   has studied Narcissism at YouTube..

Ask him.

Mrkelly » 30 Jan 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2026, 1:43 pm

U of tube?