Liberal Forum

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 9:42 am

But is she here? You have been bringing it up that she was coming to town.  Have you resolved the paternity of your kid yet?

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 9:46 am

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 9:42 am

But is she here? You have been bringing it up that she was coming to town.  Have you resolved the paternity of your kid yet?

Fredinho!

It's a bit early, isn't it?

She'll be here tomorrow.

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 9:50 am

With the father?  Damn, that's cold.

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:14 am

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 9:50 am

With the father?  Damn, that's cold.

Is this your A game?

 

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:14 am

I don't need the A game with you.  YOU are bush league,

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:16 am

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:14 am

I don't need the A game with you.  YOU are bush league,

I'm not the one playing badly...

 

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:24 am

Actually, you are playing just as I wanted.  As you usually do.  Remember, you are here because of me.

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:41 am

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:24 am

Actually, you are playing just as I wanted.  As you usually do.  Remember, you are here because of me.

WHAT?


 

 

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:44 am

Don't play dumb.  Well, then again, you ain't playin'

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:47 am

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:44 am

Don't play dumb.  Well, then again, you ain't playin'

@*TinyVictim,

You're in the habit of inventing ****.

You recently insisted that you stole "No questions, Spoon!" from cannonpointer. 
 

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am

Weiss is not saying that CBS should lie. She is saying that CBS should present lies and truth as equivalent. That the journalist who documents an execution and the administration spokesman who calls it self-defense should be given equal weight. That “both sides” deserve representation, even when one side is simply making things up. 

This is the false balance that has plagued American journalism for decades, but Weiss is taking it further. She is not just applying it to matters of opinion—should taxes be higher or lower, should we have more or less immigration—where reasonable people can disagree. She is applying it to matters of fact. Did the agents shoot a man who was trying to help someone? The footage says yes. The administration says no. Weiss says: let’s hear from both sides. 

When you treat lies as one legitimate perspective among many, you are not being fair. You are being complicit. You are lending the authority of your institution to the project of deception. You are telling your audience that they cannot trust their own eyes, that reality is up for debate, that power gets to define what happened.

https://www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/th ... journalist

There are the Eager and the Unwitting..

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 01 Feb 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 10:58 am

No, you have a habit of lying about it.

You have 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 11:08 am

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 01 Feb 2026, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 11:09 am

Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 11:16 am

Tag!


you're it!

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 11:16 am

Tag!

@Deezer Shoove  

you're it!

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

DeezerShoove » 01 Feb 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 11:20 am

YOUR game, ****.
Keep me out of it.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

DeezerShoove » 01 Feb 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 11:20 am

YOUR game, ****.
Keep me out of it.

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am

Weiss is not saying that CBS should lie. She is saying that CBS should present lies and truth as equivalent. That the journalist who documents an execution and the administration spokesman who calls it self-defense should be given equal weight. That “both sides” deserve representation, even when one side is simply making things up. 

This is the false balance that has plagued American journalism for decades, but Weiss is taking it further. She is not just applying it to matters of opinion—should taxes be higher or lower, should we have more or less immigration—where reasonable people can disagree. She is applying it to matters of fact. Did the agents shoot a man who was trying to help someone? The footage says yes. The administration says no. Weiss says: let’s hear from both sides. 

When you treat lies as one legitimate perspective among many, you are not being fair. You are being complicit. You are lending the authority of your institution to the project of deception. You are telling your audience that they cannot trust their own eyes, that reality is up for debate, that power gets to define what happened.

https://www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/th ... journalist

There are the Eager and the Unwitting..

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

RebelGator » 01 Feb 2026, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2026, 8:13 am

And then there's you, the meager and the witless.....sounds like the title of a soap opera or the life and times of a failed human.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."