Balls is Square in Trump Land... In The Context of Criminals...
JohnnyYou » 01 Feb 2026, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I reccomend Super Trolls Anonymous.. They can help with social media addiction.
Vegasna.. What the phook are you trying to prove here? You are wasting time. There must be more important things in your life.
I think that they enable him because he is
Well the Black Vegetable Loves You Baby.Vegas » 01 Feb 2026, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude, you are the very last person to talk when it comes to wasting time here. No matter what time of day I show up, you are here.
Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Weiss is not saying that CBS should lie. She is saying that CBS should present lies and truth as equivalent. That the journalist who documents an execution and the administration spokesman who calls it self-defense should be given equal weight. That “both sides” deserve representation, even when one side is simply making things up.
This is the false balance that has plagued American journalism for decades, but Weiss is taking it further. She is not just applying it to matters of opinion—should taxes be higher or lower, should we have more or less immigration—where reasonable people can disagree. She is applying it to matters of fact. Did the agents shoot a man who was trying to help someone? The footage says yes. The administration says no. Weiss says: let’s hear from both sides.
When you treat lies as one legitimate perspective among many, you are not being fair. You are being complicit. You are lending the authority of your institution to the project of deception. You are telling your audience that they cannot trust their own eyes, that reality is up for debate, that power gets to define what happened.
https://www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/th ... journalist
There are the Eager and the Unwitting..
You're a **** idiot.PlumHollow » 01 Feb 2026, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Some people (like you) aren't able to grasp that when a person puts themselves in harm's way, they might get harmed. There isn't any magic to that simple concept. Can they be made into martyrs for their brainwashing masters or not? That would be the only real success in a useless death. Try to make something out of it even if spin is the only way to do that. Between the paid agitators and paid useful idiots, there isn't really any loss to the country in the long run.
Take a hike, Coward...
So when do you surrender loser?
Rog isn't nearly enough to save you.
Fondler,Beekeeper » 02 Feb 2026, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ Is that what you think that was??
He loves seeing you get your *** HANDED TO YOU and I wanted to make sure he didn't miss the bloodletting.
Yours is the only blood I ever see let...
The Mother **** got a little blood in their boots. And they shoved their 2A Rights one in their mouth and shot it.Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ Yours is the only blood I ever see let...
Unless I'm carving into one of your buds...
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Weiss is not saying that CBS should lie. She is saying that CBS should present lies and truth as equivalent. That the journalist who documents an execution and the administration spokesman who calls it self-defense should be given equal weight. That “both sides” deserve representation, even when one side is simply making things up.
This is the false balance that has plagued American journalism for decades, but Weiss is taking it further. She is not just applying it to matters of opinion—should taxes be higher or lower, should we have more or less immigration—where reasonable people can disagree. She is applying it to matters of fact. Did the agents shoot a man who was trying to help someone? The footage says yes. The administration says no. Weiss says: let’s hear from both sides.
When you treat lies as one legitimate perspective among many, you are not being fair. You are being complicit. You are lending the authority of your institution to the project of deception. You are telling your audience that they cannot trust their own eyes, that reality is up for debate, that power gets to define what happened.
https://www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/th ... journalist
There are the Eager and the Unwitting..
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Weiss is not saying that CBS should lie. She is saying that CBS should present lies and truth as equivalent. That the journalist who documents an execution and the administration spokesman who calls it self-defense should be given equal weight. That “both sides” deserve representation, even when one side is simply making things up.
This is the false balance that has plagued American journalism for decades, but Weiss is taking it further. She is not just applying it to matters of opinion—should taxes be higher or lower, should we have more or less immigration—where reasonable people can disagree. She is applying it to matters of fact. Did the agents shoot a man who was trying to help someone? The footage says yes. The administration says no. Weiss says: let’s hear from both sides.
When you treat lies as one legitimate perspective among many, you are not being fair. You are being complicit. You are lending the authority of your institution to the project of deception. You are telling your audience that they cannot trust their own eyes, that reality is up for debate, that power gets to define what happened.
https://www.notesfromthecircus.com/p/th ... journalist
There are the Eager and the Unwitting..
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.