Liberal Forum

Vegas » 02 Feb 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 10:30 am

You know how to end this. It would require you to man up and answer a question for once in your **** life. 

1. Here we go: Pic...prove you answered the first time...prove a negative...blah blah blah...

SGDFS. So **** predictable.

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 10:35 am

****.

After this there will be another. 

 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Deezer Shoove » 02 Feb 2026, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 8:02 am

Joe Biden...?
Is that you?

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 6:51 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... ub-dinner/

“So many people in the room I hate. Most of you I like,” he said, according to an attendee. “Who in the hell thought this was going to happen?”....

“We’re not going to invade Greenland. We’re going to buy it,” he said. “It’s never been my intention to make Greenland the 51st state. I want to make Canada the 51st state. Greenland will be the 52nd state. Venezuela can be 53rd.” 
Trump also pointed to Kevin Warsh, his nominee to be the next Fed chairman. 
“If he doesn’t lower interest rates I’m suing his *** off,” Trump said. After a beat, he added, “I’m kidding.” After another beat, he concluded, “Eh …” 
Asked later by reporters about the comments, he responded, “It’s a roast. It’s a comedy night” — though he added that he hopes Warsh lowers interest rates.

How could any Toady decline this in favor of Dr. Jill Stein?

We should ask him.

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

DeezerShoove » 02 Feb 2026, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 8:04 am

Why is this a thread, TDS Toilet?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 10:25 am

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

Vegas » 02 Feb 2026, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 10:39 am

The **** there will. The reason I am demoralizing you with this one over and over is because I am sick of your evasions. The whole **** forum is sick of them. 

It wouldn't be so bad if you didn't demand answers to your questions while you evade everyone else. 

But your rules don't apply to you, so it is what it is.

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 6:51 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... ub-dinner/

“So many people in the room I hate. Most of you I like,” he said, according to an attendee. “Who in the hell thought this was going to happen?”....



“We’re not going to invade Greenland. We’re going to buy it,” he said. “It’s never been my intention to make Greenland the 51st state. I want to make Canada the 51st state. Greenland will be the 52nd state. Venezuela can be 53rd.” 
Trump also pointed to Kevin Warsh, his nominee to be the next Fed chairman. 
“If he doesn’t lower interest rates I’m suing his *** off,” Trump said. After a beat, he added, “I’m kidding.” After another beat, he concluded, “Eh …” 
Asked later by reporters about the comments, he responded, “It’s a roast. It’s a comedy night” — though he added that he hopes Warsh lowers interest rates.


How could any Toady decline this in favor of Dr. Jill Stein?


We should ask him.
 
 

 

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 3:59 pm

In light of the title here is one hell of a speaker:

https://youtube.com/shorts/sKGV_FsWjM8? ... qRpxp17onv

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 8:06 am

if it mentions injecting bleach, that should narrow it down for you.

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm

Why are you running from the question in the OP?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 3:59 pm

In light of the title here is one hell of a speaker:

https://youtube.com/shorts/sKGV_FsWjM8? ... qRpxp17onv

Why are you running from the question in the OP?

 

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:40 pm

Didn't even read it.  I have decided when posting on YOUR threads I am going to use the diversion style of ignoring the OP that YOU DO.

If you can't take it that is your problem.

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 3:59 pm

In light of the title here is one hell of a speaker:

https://youtube.com/shorts/sKGV_FsWjM8? ... qRpxp17onv

Why are you running from the question in the OP?

 

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:44 pm

Here is a bunch of really great Biden moments.

https://youtube.com/shorts/vFN7kTvZxwI? ... l9zfHLCEU2

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:46 pm

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:44 pm

Here is a bunch of really great Biden moments.

https://youtube.com/shorts/vFN7kTvZxwI? ... l9zfHLCEU2

Who called Biden a "great off the cuff speaker"?

 

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:54 pm

s that a question?  LMAO!  

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:56 pm

Huey » 02 Feb 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:54 pm

s that a question?  LMAO!  Didn't say anyone did because if they did I would be isn their face LMAO posting this ****.

Acknowledge you were answered.  It wasn't until Jan 21 2025 that you suddenly became concerned with how a President speaks.  

Shall I move onto Kamala next?

This is more of your hypocrisy being demonstrated
 

Racing towards the Event Horizon of Cretin.

 

Vegas » 02 Feb 2026, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 4:30 pm

Cry to Deezer.

Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 02 Feb 2026, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2026, 10:35 am

****.

After this there will be another. 

Because you're obsessed and demoralized.

This is why we need one set of clear rules.