your hard on has lasted 9 years?Vegas » 02 Feb 2026, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Since 2017, our forum narcissist has graced us with his title of being the undefeated champion of question avoidance. For several months now, as you all know, I have been asking the same damn question for him to evade. Because...why not? I enjoy watching a narcissist squirm and cry to the mods for help (no really. He does. I am not joking.) It's a fascinating social experiment. He has perfected the art of demanding answers while answering absolutely none, despite repeated invitations to do so. Recently, the rate of demanded answers has increased, while the answer-giving rate remains a solid 0.00. This poll seeks community guidance on whether the natural corrective mechanism, asking the same unanswered question more often, should be adjusted to maintain balance, fairness, and comedic symmetry.
@Blackvegetable
Do you believe the hypocrisy of this jackass, he's had a flaccid penis from 2016 to 2020, with 4 years of forgetting he even had a penis from 2020 to 2024, and now he's in full shrinkage since 2025.
Watch this....Vegas » 02 Feb 2026, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Since 2017, our forum narcissist has graced us with his title of being the undefeated champion of question avoidance. For several months now, as you all know, I have been asking the same damn question for him to evade. Because...why not? I enjoy watching a narcissist squirm and cry to the mods for help (no really. He does. I am not joking.) It's a fascinating social experiment. He has perfected the art of demanding answers while answering absolutely none, despite repeated invitations to do so. Recently, the rate of demanded answers has increased, while the answer-giving rate remains a solid 0.00. This poll seeks community guidance on whether the natural corrective mechanism, asking the same unanswered question more often, should be adjusted to maintain balance, fairness, and comedic symmetry.
@Blackvegetable
Recently, the rate of demanded answers has increased, while the answer-giving rate remains a solid 0.00.

Prove you answered the first time...Then you will demand I prove a negative.
Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ Prove you answered the first time...Then you will demand I prove a negative.
There is no **** way that you don't know this drill by now.
are these your words?Recently, the rate of demanded answers has increased, while the answer-giving rate remains a solid 0.00.
Blackvegetable » 03 Feb 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ are these your words?
Where do you see "first time"?
You don't.
**** idiot
OKVegas » 03 Feb 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Nope. Mine has been great. I have enjoyed curb-stomping him. I still do.
Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
So now you are admitting that it's okay to not answer after being asked the first time.
QED.
Anyway, I will be drowning you in the survivorship bias question with much more frequency. We both know you won't answer. That isn't the point. I am going to increase the frequency until you decrease your demands. There is no **** way I am going to let you demand answers to your questions, while you evade everyone else's.Blackvegetable » 03 Feb 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Vegas should do my numbers soon, because I intend to hide like there is a nuclear fallout today.
That's quite honest, for you...Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Anyway, I'm gonna give up, now that Blackvegetable has exposed me again as a coward, hypocrite, narcissist and moron.
I should have killed myself years ago....
You seem upset already. It's still morning. Did @Huey already set off Mary before I came?Blackvegetable » 03 Feb 2026, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ That's quite honest, for you...
I think a breakthrough is near....
Don't waffle...Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Hiding twice.
Post your own **** rule, that won't apply to you.
Is it not OK?it's okay to not answer after being asked the first time.
Your version:So now you are admitting that it's okay to not answer after being asked the first time.
QED.
it's okay to not answer after being asked the first time.
Context, you **** *******.Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable first I catch you editing AI, then I catch you editing me. .![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
My original quote:
Your version:
You stupid stupid stupid child.