Speaking of fraud.....Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Marjorie Taylor Greene: MAGA was 'all a lie'
https://search.app/fGYZS
She doesn't GET it. MAGA wasn't a lie at all. It simply EVOLVED. And MGT failed to evolve with it.Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Marjorie Taylor Greene: MAGA was 'all a lie'
https://search.app/fGYZS
Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Marjorie Taylor Greene: MAGA was 'all a lie'
https://search.app/fGYZS
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
There you go again. Demanding ****, while you evade everyone else.Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑
List your sources...assuming you aren't a coward, of course...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Are you talking about the local chapter of The Fruit Cult?*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Feb 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Speaking of fraud.....
Please amaze the normal men here with
nefarious101 » 04 Feb 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't right now
I'm snowboarding down Mount Everest
Headed down Dumb **** Ridge....there's one now!
I took mine 20 minutes from now

nefarious101 » 04 Feb 2026, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I took mine 20 minutes from now
How's Detroit....does the bus station your at have vending machines?

Where are you gonna find that Cannon sticker??nefarious101 » 04 Feb 2026, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I plan on taking this pic tomorrow morning....Smithy the Dickhead
Between you and me...you're the one who is in total lockstep with [[[Queer Agenda]]].Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you talking about the local chapter of The Fruit Cult?

You don't have the boulders for this..nefarious101 » 04 Feb 2026, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ it's on the board dickhead
I'll take that picture tomorrow...it doesn't exist yet
what you are seeing is just an image I placed in your weak primative mind
it's a matter of mind over dickhead....no biggie...science!!