Prove it wasn'tVegas » 06 Feb 2026, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. That wasn't your claim. Another lie. Post your original claim..not an edited one. Post the original.
Go stalk yourself this time.
It wouldn't require you doing anything other than what you demanded.Vegas » 06 Feb 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ You did it again. You demand I prove a negative. Do you ever learn. Ever?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ It wouldn't require you doing anything other than what you demanded.
Post the rule.
Where have I ever demanded that you prove a negative?Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ It wouldn't require you doing anything other than what you demanded.
Post the rule.
It isn't about proving a negative.Vegas » 06 Feb 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Where have I ever demanded that you prove a negative?
Post your own **** rules.
Because the issue is bipartisan..PhiloBeddo » 05 Feb 2026, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Not a peep. Dems never said **** about Epstein under Biden.
When you are making a demand for me to prove a negative, then that is exactly what it is about you dumb pos.
YOU ARE A ******! BV CAN REACH OUT AND GRAB YA.. ABRACADABRA..