I tried..no need...but then, I'm in tampon world...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom And all I have seen against it is obtaining Voter ID creates a burden. But no specific burden was mentioned.Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Shouldn't you first offer the case FOR Voter ID?
I've only seen "Because Sweden...." and, predictably, "Because Blackvegetable.....".
It's called "The Great Backfill"...SouthernFried » 10 Feb 2026, 1:48 am » wrote: ↑ Their process behind it is quite simple.
1.) Import third-world slime by the tens of millions.
2.) Promise these same people "free" this and "free" that.
3.) Now point at your political opposition and say they are racists that hate them.
4.) Congratulations, you've now secured nearly all those votes and permanent power.
A **** idiot can see that a mile off. It's all about securing a vote. We've even seen ludicrous proposals brought up in the past by Democraps such as allowing 16-year-olds to vote. Why would they want that? Because they have already realized that these kids are brainwashed idiots who will vote for them. You think they would want to lower the voting age if they calculated that most the votes would be red? Of course not.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom what did he say that isn't true? GO!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom RebelGator » 10 Feb 2026, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ He's not Hitler?
You're dropping the signature line that your influencers have prescribed?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom WTF?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Are you **** stupid? Wait...don't answer that. It was rhetorical.
But there is no evidence that there are any issues with voting security....why not demand everyone wear a colander on their heads in case of "Negative Waves"?Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Are you **** stupid? Wait...don't answer that. It was rhetorical.Your turn.
- Let's start with in-person verification to ensure voters aren't voting under multiple identities. Which is something you would do. Your memory is so **** bad, it would prevent you from voting multiple times because you couldn't remember that you already voted. ****,
- It helps election officials to reduce clerical errors, verify identity quicker, and it provides cleaner voter rolls. Loser.
- Consistency. I have to show ID to the bank and airport, but when it comes to voting who runs the **** country,...well that isn't important enough evidently. **** bag.
- Builds trust in the integrity of our elections. It would provide some evidence that there was little election fraud. Thereby, boosting confidence in who was rightfully elected. The public already has **** confidence in our elections, due to fraud. It would at least salvage some of that confidence. *** clown.
Oh that's right. You don't answer questions.
1. Pic...oh **** it. You know the drill you disgusting excuse for a human being.
Can't you at least make an effort to inform yourself?Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ But there is no evidence that there are any issues with voting security....why not demand everyone wear a colander on their heads in case of "Negative Waves"?
I see no evidence of fraudulent voting.Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Can't you at least make an effort to inform yourself?
These address both nationwide and local. Not that I expect you to read any of them. Jackhole.
Go kill yourself in the most painfully way possible. The whole world hates you.
Russian Hacking on Election More Widespread Than Reported | TIME
Election Security | Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Jury finds former Milwaukee election official guilty of obtaining fake absentee ballots | AP News
Swing-state county reports thousands of suspected fraudulent voter registration forms
FBI and CISA Release Joint PSA, Just So You Know: False Claims of Hacked Voter Information Likely Intended to Sow Distrust of U.S. Elections | CISA
Have you never voted?BuckNaked » 10 Feb 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ How are the voting poll workers suppose to identify the person in front of them?
Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ Just as I predicted. You didn't **** read them. That's your problem.
But don't ever say I didn't provide evidence. You refusing to read it is on you. Jerkoff.
No more questions until you read the evidence.Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ No problem..
What did CISA conclude about election security in 2020?
I looked for evidence of voter fraud....there was none.Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ No more questions until you read the evidence.
You don't even answer my questions, so I owe you nothing.
1. Drill...
You didn't read a **** thing. Shut up. I owe you no answers until you read it.Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ I looked for evidence of voter fraud....there was none.
Now answer the question about your source.
Yea....right, Welshy.....Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't read a **** thing. Shut up. I owe you no answers until you read it.
I don't expect you to read; we both know you won't. So let's do this:
You answer the OP's question and then I answer yours.
1. Obviously evade. Duh.