Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 11:07 am

I see no evidence of fraudulent voting.


 

 

So...

Huey » 10 Feb 2026, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 12:20 pm

So...

Usual Veghead. He demands evidence of fraudulent voting. I give him like 5 pieces of evidence. He refuses to read the evidence, then says he sees no evidence. His MO never changes. You can't fix stupid. 

@Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 1:06 pm

Usual Veghead. He demands evidence of fraudulent voting. I give him like 5 pieces of evidence. He refuses to read the evidence, then says he sees no evidence. His MO never changes. You can't fix stupid. 

@Blackvegetable  

 

I would like evidence of the burden he speaks about.
 

Huey » 10 Feb 2026, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 1:34 pm

I would like evidence of the burden he speaks about.

There's an extensive debate about it, but you wouldn't know if you only watch FOX.

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/free-vote ... ort-finds/

Obtaining a “free” voter identification card can typically cost an individual between $75 and $175. When legal fees are factored in, the cost can increase to over $1,000. These are two of the conclusions drawn from an analysis of actual expenses incurred by individuals who needed to obtain identification cards in three states that had recently passed new voting requirements. “The High Cost of ‘Free’ Photo Voter Identification Cards,” (PDF, 3.1 MB) a new report authored by Richard Sobel and released by the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice at Harvard Law School, notes that, even when the card itself is free, “voter IDs are expensive, often prohibitively so.”

https://newhampshirebulletin.com/2026/0 ... eek-trial/

The bill ended two waivers that made it easier to vote: qualified voter affidavits, which allowed registrants to attest to their U.S. citizenship on penalty of perjury; and challenged voter affidavits, which allowed voters whose ballots were challenged on Election Day by an officially designated challenger from each party to cast their vote anyway while the challenge was pending.  

Now, plaintiffs say the law violates the First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution by placing severe and unjustified burdens on the right to vote. 

if all you know is what you learn from FOX, you don't know anything at all.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 11:07 am

Have you never voted?

no and I always have to show ID 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 3:06 pm

Huey » 10 Feb 2026, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 1:34 pm

I would like evidence of the burden he speaks about.

There's an extensive debate about it, but you wouldn't know if you only watch FOX.

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/free-vote ... ort-finds/

Obtaining a “free” voter identification card can typically cost an individual between $75 and $175. When legal fees are factored in, the cost can increase to over $1,000. These are two of the conclusions drawn from an analysis of actual expenses incurred by individuals who needed to obtain identification cards in three states that had recently passed new voting requirements. “The High Cost of ‘Free’ Photo Voter Identification Cards,” (PDF, 3.1 MB) a new report authored by Richard Sobel and released by the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice at Harvard Law School, notes that, even when the card itself is free, “voter IDs are expensive, often prohibitively so.”

https://newhampshirebulletin.com/2026/0 ... eek-trial/

The bill ended two waivers that made it easier to vote: qualified voter affidavits, which allowed registrants to attest to their U.S. citizenship on penalty of perjury; and challenged voter affidavits, which allowed voters whose ballots were challenged on Election Day by an officially designated challenger from each party to cast their vote anyway while the challenge was pending.  

Now, plaintiffs say the law violates the First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution by placing severe and unjustified burdens on the right to vote. 

if all you know is what you learn from FOX, you don't know anything at all.
 

 

So the burden you whine about is no different than the same "burden" suffered by those getting a drivers license or other form of ID.

This report found that they do. Drawing on published articles obtained through the Internet, media, and legal testimony, it identifies the documentation, travel, loss of work and waiting time costs incurred by three different individuals in each of three states—Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Texas—who needed to obtain “free” voter identification cards. 

LMAO!  

Additionally, in most of those states you can vote absentee and use the various forms like those I posted for GA:  << Or >>

• Any of the following documents that show your name and address:  
  • Current utility bill  
  • Bank statement  
  • Paycheck  
  • Government check  
  • Other government document. 

https://sos.ga.gov/page/georgia-voter-i ... quirements

Your 12 year old study has been kicked to the curb.  What else you got?


 

Huey » 10 Feb 2026, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 3:46 pm

So the burden you whine about is ..




Your 12 year old study has been kicked to the curb.  What else you got?

a constitutional question currently being litigated.


Accordingly your fee fees are entirely irrelevant. 

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm

a constitutional question currently being litigated.


Accordingly your fee fees are entirely irrelevant. 

Nod.

 

Try again:

So the burden you whine about is no different than the same "burden" suffered by those getting a drivers license or other form of ID.

This report found that they do. Drawing on published articles obtained through the Internet, media, and legal testimony, it identifies the documentation, travel, loss of work and waiting time costs incurred by three different individuals in each of three states—Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Texas—who needed to obtain “free” voter identification cards. 

LMAO!  

Additionally, in most of those states you can vote absentee and use the various forms like those I posted for GA:  << Or >>

• Any of the following documents that show your name and address:  
  • Current utility bill  
  • Bank statement  
  • Paycheck  
  • Government check  
  • Other government document. 

https://sos.ga.gov/page/georgia-voter-i ... quirements

Your 12 year old study has been kicked to the curb.  What else you got?

 

Huey » 10 Feb 2026, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 4:30 pm

Try again:

So the burden you whine about is

Established.


Next!

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 4:36 pm

Established.


 

Doubt it. You don't establish anything. You are too busy demanding everyone else to establish ****, because your rules don't apply to you. 
 

murdock » 09 Feb 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 5:24 pm

They want *** chinks to vote!

We do not use the word chink on this board.

It's racist. 
 

murdock » 09 Feb 2026, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 5:47 pm

Leftist ****!

We do not use the word leftist on this board. 

It's too insulting. 
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Feb 2026, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 7:27 pm

Students? Have to go all the way home to vote?

Students can choose to register where they matriculate. Or they can go absentee.

JohnnyYou » 09 Feb 2026, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 7:27 pm

Women have to have a name change.

Only conservative women. Leftist broads keep their fathers' names, to fight the patriarchy.

JohnnyYou » 09 Feb 2026, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 7:30 pm

Hey dumb azz Vegasna..

If you can prove any voter fraud that would have changed the outcome you would have done it by now.

2026 is not the time to **** with Tulsi Flappards over 2020 dunbshyt big azz lies. Smoke a Rudy G Fatty Cigar and get Ancient Flatulating.

youtu.be/mXiF77FA9aI?si=ZBdnin3XC3L34qQl[DAH PUDDING DOTH CUM]

Wagging your *** doesn't defend your position. 

What do you have against requiring voter ID?
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 4:36 pm

Established.

Next!

Spit the horse dick out ***.

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 3:06 pm

if all you know is what you learn from FOX, you don't know anything at all.
 

If all you learned after birth was how to believe life wasn't self evident time equally alive, what do you understand about evolving since conception when all social facts are based upon after birth time alive?

Your brain existed since a fertilized cell and your mind didn't develop until after birth when trained to recite humanity's promises life exceeds the time your heart beats so far 7 scheduled days a week every rotation alive your body never stays the same results twice.

Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 5:14 pm

Doubt it. You don't establish anything. You are too busy demanding everyone else to establish ****, because your rules don't apply to you.

Prove I didn't. 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 6:45 pm

Prove I didn't.

      You did it again. Demanding proof for a negative. 

God your memory is so **** ****. No wonder why I have to remind you of the drill every time. 

The error happens when someone shifts the burden of proof by saying:

 “You can’t prove it isn’t true, therefore it must be true.”

 This is known as an argument from ignorance (appeal to ignorance).Why it’s a fallacy:

• Absence of evidence is not evidence of truth.
• Many negatives are logically impossible to prove universally (e.g., “There are no invisible unicorns anywhere in the universe”).
• The person making a claim must provide positive evidence for it.

SGDFS         

Vegas » 10 Feb 2026, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 6:59 pm

      You did it again. Demanding proof for a negative. 

God your memory is so **** ****. No wonder why I have to remind you of the drill every time. 

SGDFS       

No.


My argument is extant.

You can go and. :rofl:   :die:  you know  :die:   :rofl:  challenge it.

:die:  
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 8:38 pm

 

**** A.......