Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Welcome Back My Friends To The Show That Never Ends - @Rog62 Edition
Welcome Back My Friends To The Show That Never Ends - @Rog62 Edition
By Blackvegetable
9 Feb 2026 2:19 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Feb 2026 10:33 am
Ghettee on up Offa that thang.. The Ghuttzno Ballsters Blues.. Ben WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
youtu.be/ZEh9QAmy3lg?si=M1UvlfPt9PsSzGMu[GOOD GOD.. EVERYBODY READY?]
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
10 Feb 2026 11:05 am
eternally changing form since conception doesn't offer do overs. Change of habits sure, but you have to choose to stop pretending nobody know s the natural algorithm of genetic compounding of chromosomes in series parallel positions here now.Johnny You » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Start over...
youtu.be/Wp8UlgvCVlI?si=1fVJ-ViR7xfA39i6[FROM THE BEGINNING]
the show that never ends is governed by rule(directing human behavior cradle to grave) of law.
10 Feb 2026 12:39 pm
So what's your favorite brand of toilet paper? Does yourr Golden Toilet ever get clogged?*31stArrival » 10 Feb 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ eternally changing form since conception doesn't offer do overs. Change of habits sure, but you have to choose to stop pretending nobody know s the natural algorithm of genetic compounding of chromosomes in series parallel positions here now.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
10 Feb 2026 1:14 pm
So you deflect rather than discuss the common human error intentionally never corrected for everyone's social consensus reality manifested into saving humanity 24/7 progress every generation added since dawn of civilization.Johnny You » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So what's your favorite brand of toilet paper? Does yourr Golden Toilet ever get clogged?
11 Feb 2026 9:04 am
did the jury's award for damages include a statement that the amount awarded, was due to actual rape and not for "defamation and sexual battery"?Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑
The Verdict.
The "opinion" addressed WHY the jury awarded 2 million.
The "special verdict" was at request of and by agreement of both parties.
It was not required by the court.
A "finding"
That you're a **** idiot.
Duh.
Why did it award 2 million?
Why did Team Grifty petition for a reduction?
why did Judge Kaplan uphold the award?
How much of it have you read, JuCo?
because if not, you, along with Kaplan are just holding your dicks and pissing in the wind...
of course they would contest it...what lawyers don't?
It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...of course he upheld it...
Damn, are you a stupid **** human.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
11 Feb 2026 9:29 am
ROG62 » 11 Feb 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ did the jury's award for damages include a statement that the amount awarded, was due to actual rape and not for "defamation and sexual battery"?
because if not, you, along with Kaplan are just holding your dicks and pissing in the wind...
of course they would contest it...what lawyers don't?
It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...of course he upheld it...
Damn, are you a stupid **** human.
there was one amount for defamation and a second for sexual.assault.did the jury's award for damages include a statement that the amount awarded, was due to actual rape and not for "defamation and sexual battery"?
resolved.because if not,
because it is not at their discretion....it is at the client's.of course they would contest it...what lawyers don't?
You really don't have any idea how this **** works, do you...
where?It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...
And don't pull another JuCo, JuCo.
Your "if/not" failed....you dropped your micropeepee....Damn, are you a stupid **** human.
11 Feb 2026 10:15 am
the judge projected on something the jury didn't state...Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ there was one amount for defamation and a second for sexual.assault.
resolved.
because it is not at their discretion....it is at the client's.
You really don't have any idea how this **** works, do you...
where?
And don't pull another JuCo, JuCo.
Your "if/not" failed....you dropped your micropeepee....
game over, clinger...stick a fork in your leg...yer done...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
11 Feb 2026 10:56 am
ROG62 » 11 Feb 2026, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ the judge projected on something the jury didn't state...
game over, clinger...stick a fork in your leg...yer done...
Wrong.the judge projected on something the jury didn't state...
If all your assumptions are wrong, your conclusion is prohibitively likely to be of little value.
You, quite predictably, ran from the question...
11 Feb 2026 11:03 am
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 11:06 am
It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...
where? And don't pull another JuCo, JuCo.
do the right thing....
11 Feb 2026 11:07 am
You accusing others of evading questions?Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...where? And don't pull another JuCo, JuCo.
do the right thing....
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 11:34 am
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
11 Feb 2026 12:21 pm
It looks like you are back to your over-the-top hypocrisy again. You know what needs to happen from here. Whenever you pull this level of hypocrisy, I will be increasing my survivorship bias question. So brace yourself, narcissist boy. The tsunami is coming...
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 12:58 pm
11 Feb 2026 1:06 pm
ROG62 » 11 Feb 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ did the jury's award for damages include a statement that the amount awarded, was due to actual rape and not for "defamation and sexual battery"?
because if not, you, along with Kaplan are just holding your dicks and pissing in the wind...
of course they would contest it...what lawyers don't?
It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump...of course he upheld it...
Damn, are you a stupid **** human.
It's already proven kaplan is an activist judge who hates Trump.
Where?
11 Feb 2026 1:16 pm
Hiding again. Shocker.
Anyway, let's get started. Enjoy. I'll be pulverizing your threads with this.
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 1:19 pm
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 1:19 pm
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 1:21 pm
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
11 Feb 2026 1:27 pm
Who is online
In total there are 4397 users online :: 13 registered, 15 bots, and 4369 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, RebelGator, MR-7, Beekeeper, jerra b, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Not, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Firefox/7.0, CriteoBot, DuckDuckGo, curl/7, YandexBot, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, GPTBot