Dickhead experiencing another Trump derangement syndrome episode # 8753Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2026, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Americans Are Paying the Bill for Tariffs, Despite Trump’s Claims
Research from the New York Fed confirms that U.S. companies and consumers are bearing tariff costs, despite the president’s assertions otherwise.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/busi ... p-fed.html
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.

So this is a direct and measurable effect of Grafty's tariffs, but you're cool.with it.nefarious101 » 12 Feb 2026, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Dickhead experiencing another Trump derangement syndrome episode # 8753
Tariffs are like that carnation you stuck on the FNB you took to the prom...it takes some time and additional strategic moves before you can feel the results.Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2026, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Americans Are Paying the Bill for Tariffs, Despite Trump’s Claims
Research from the New York Fed confirms that U.S. companies and consumers are bearing tariff costs, despite the president’s assertions otherwise.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/busi ... p-fed.html
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.
This is another example of you copy/pasting with no thoughts of your own...other than: SGDFS. Just like I predicted. 100% accuracy.Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2026, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Americans Are Paying the Bill for Tariffs, Despite Trump’s Claims
Research from the New York Fed confirms that U.S. companies and consumers are bearing tariff costs, despite the president’s assertions otherwise.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/busi ... p-fed.html
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
These **** are never gonna get that this is a tax on AmericansBlackvegetable » 12 Feb 2026, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Americans Are Paying the Bill for Tariffs, Despite Trump’s Claims
Research from the New York Fed confirms that U.S. companies and consumers are bearing tariff costs, despite the president’s assertions otherwise.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/busi ... p-fed.html
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.
Do Americans pay the tariffs?Vegas » 12 Feb 2026, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ This is another example of you copy/pasting with no thoughts of your own...other than: SGDFS. Just like I predicted. 100% accuracy.
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
I don't read his OPs anymore, so I have no idea what you are talking about. They were usually, if not always, grounded in TDS from sources that were written by someone with TDS. I have little doubt that has changed. He copy/pastes other people's thoughts, so he doesn't have to come up with any himself. **** him.
You're a **** idiot
In December, the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers rose 0.3 percent, seasonally adjusted, and rose 2.7 percent over the last 12 months, not seasonally adjusted. The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.2 percent in December (SA); up 2.6 percent over the year (NSA).Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2026, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Americans Are Paying the Bill for Tariffs, Despite Trump’s Claims
Research from the New York Fed confirms that U.S. companies and consumers are bearing tariff costs, despite the president’s assertions otherwise.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/busi ... p-fed.html
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Define "deflation"ROG62 » 13 Feb 2026, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ In December, the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers rose 0.3 percent, seasonally adjusted, and rose 2.7 percent over the last 12 months, not seasonally adjusted. The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.2 percent in December (SA); up 2.6 percent over the year (NSA).
https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
isn't the Fed's goal @2-3%
does this mean we'd have deflation if the tariffs weren't in place?
asking for a friend...
Clicking on one of your posts, Curiosity Boy.
From.what, exactly, do you insist I'm "running"?
Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2026, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ So this is a direct and measurable effect of Grafty's tariffs, but you're cool.with it.
Because you're an imbecile
