Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 16 Feb 2026, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2026, 5:03 pm

just coffee? well, to offset that, your Forrester is operating on cheaper fuel...

I wish. Try Impreza.

I should've bought a crosstrek for the clearance. 

If prices had been lower under biden, you would have a steady supply of talking points arguing presidents have nothing to do with gas prices. So why should I accept an argument that you, yourself, do not truly believe?
 

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2026, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2026, 7:18 pm

I wish. Try Impreza.

I should've bought a crosstrek for the clearance. 

If prices had been lower under biden, you would have a steady supply of talking points arguing presidents have nothing to do with gas prices. So why should I accept an argument that you, yourself, do not truly believe?  

I was going to say Prius... *GASPS*

I don't drink coffee?
 

ROG62 » 15 Feb 2026, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2026, 4:18 pm

can you point out where, exactly? asking for brown...

What about PPI?

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 1:46 pm

What about PPI?

Since you can't figure it out on you own I did it for you, as usual.  Now you can stop spamming the forum with that question.

AI Overview
The Producer Price Index (PPI), published monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, measures the average change over time in selling prices received by domestic producers for their output, acting as a key inflation indicator. It tracks price changes in goods, services, and construction, covering nearly all mining and manufacturing industries. 
 
 

Huey » 17 Feb 2026, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 1:49 pm

Since you can't figure it out on you own I did it for you, as usual.  Now you can stop spamming the forum with that question.

AI Overview
The Producer Price Index (PPI), published monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, measures the average change over time in selling prices received by domestic producers for their output, acting as a key inflation indicator. It tracks price changes in goods, services, and construction, covering nearly all mining and manufacturing industries.

You're a **** idiot...

viewtopic.php?p=2849285#p2849285

Show me "spamming the forum with that question"....

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 2:14 pm

You're a **** idiot...

viewtopic.php?p=2849285#p2849285

Show me "spamming the forum with that question"....

 

How, do a search of your name and PPI and you will 14 posts with variations of that question.  
 

Huey » 17 Feb 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 2:50 pm

How, do a search of your name and PPI and you will 14 posts with variations of that question.

Vague descriptions will not do.

As you are well aware, I was obliged to repeat it at your insistence...

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 1:46 pm

What about PPI?

what about it? no beggaring, brown, post your argument...

ROG62 » 17 Feb 2026, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 6:42 pm

what about it? no beggaring, brown, post your argument...

Define "beggaring"..


Give up, JuCo...even you understand that you're an imbecile.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 6:48 pm

Define "beggaring"..


Give up, JuCo...even you understand that you're an imbecile.
 

And your intellectual soul, social consensus, and political mind is lost in faith you aren't.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm

Vague descriptions will not do.

As you are well aware, I was obliged to repeat it at your insistence...

Mental Midget, that is not a vaque description.  Are you unaware of how to do a search?  I remember it took you up to a year to figure out how to use the reply function to quote someone.
 

Huey » 18 Feb 2026, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:08 am

Mental Midget, 

You lied.

Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2026, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:10 am

You lied.

1.  The jury wa instructed about the narrow NY law concerning rape.

2.  The jury did not find there was a rape under that law.

Game.  Set.  Match.

Huey » 18 Feb 2026, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:14 am

1.  The jury wa instructed about the narrow NY law concerning rape.

2.  The jury did not find there was a rape under that law.

Game.  Set.  Match.

The finding is entirely unrelated to the VERDICT.

The jury was in no way limited by the criminal code. It was a civil action.

That is why it awarded 2 million.

Facts.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 6:48 pm

Define "beggaring"..

Give up, JuCo...even you understand that you're an imbecile.

bump 

Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2026, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:19 am

Huey » 18 Feb 2026, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:14 am

1.  The jury wa instructed about the narrow NY law concerning rape.

2.  The jury did not find there was a rape under that law.

Game.  Set.  Match.

The finding is entirely unrelated to the VERDICT.

The jury was in no way limited by the criminal code. It was a civil action.

That is why it awarded 2 million.

Facts.


 

 

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse in E. Jean Carroll's civil case

A Manhattan federal jury has determined former President Donald Trump is liable for battery and defamation in a civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll. Jurors awarded her $5 million.



https://www.npr.org/2023/05/09/11750714 ... civil-case

Huey » 18 Feb 2026, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 7:54 am

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse in E. Jean Carroll's civil case

A Manhattan federal jury has determined former President Donald Trump is liable for battery and defamation in a civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll. Jurors awarded her $5 million.

https://www.npr.org/2023/05/09/11750714 ... civil-case

It was a SPECIFIC ACT of sexual abuse.

Stop wasting time with your ignorance and tell everyone why Team Grifty petitioned for a reduction.

It is a documented fact.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2026, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 8:03 am

It was a SPECIFIC ACT of sexual abuse.

Stop wasting time with your ignorance and tell everyone why Team Grifty petitioned for a reduction.

It is a documented fact.
 

 

AI OverviewIn December 2024, ABC News and anchor George Stephanopoulos settled a defamation lawsuit with Donald Trump for $15 million, 
reported in a NPR article. The suit stemmed from an on-air comment inaccurately stating Trump was "liable for rape". The funds are designated for his presidential library, and the network published a note expressing regret over the statement. 

Huey » 18 Feb 2026, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 8:06 am

AI OverviewIn December 2024, ABC News and anchor George Stephanopoulos settled a defamation lawsuit with Donald Trump for $15 million, 
reported in a NPR article. The suit stemmed from an on-air comment inaccurately stating Trump was "liable for rape". The funds are designated for his presidential library, and the network published a note expressing regret over the statement.

A) entirely irrelevant 

B) wrong. George said a JURY found him liable for rape, which is false...Grifty was never obliged to prove it was defamatory.

Now let's get back to the RELEVANT FACTS.


Why did Team Grifty insist that the 2 million was awarded in error?



 

Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2026, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 8:38 am

A) entirely irrelevant 

B) wrong. George said a JURY found him liable for rape, which is false...Grifty was never obliged to prove it was defamatory.

Now let's get back to the RELEVANT FACTS.

Why did Team Grifty insist that the 2 million was awarded in error?

You will have to post it yourself with sources.  I have posted facts.  You, rhetoric and questions.