Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Feb 2026, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

23 Feb 2026, 10:39 am

Gaylord Merriman, Associate Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cincinnati....

His autobiography, "To Discover Mathematics - A Life" was found in the Ark of the Covenant, among some other stuff.

I own it now.

RebelGator » 25 Feb 2026, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 7:12 am

You might 

BuckNaked » 25 Feb 2026, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 7:00 am

And be very very specific

Blackvegetable » 25 Feb 2026, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 7:15 am

Just don't be an idiot...

*31stArrival » 25 Feb 2026, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 7:09 am

About actual life evolving or relative time being alive choosing to stay in character 24/7, cradle to grave?

Buck Naked » 25 Feb 2026, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 9:49 am

what’s the difference?
 

*31stArrival » 25 Feb 2026, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 6:17 pm

Adapting to the moment since conception vs adopting a 7 day week methodology of staying in character cradle to grave selecting a franchise of humanity as your defense from honest soles explaining the natural genetic algorithm sustaining daily global population of this species each rotation forward now.

Johnny You » 25 Feb 2026, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2026, 11:17 pm

youtu.be/BBVAS8qNZZI?si=OrV3bVQyES2GLuni

,Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am

I pledge publicly to answer BLS questions on a one for one Basis with one stipulation.  The questions must be on the topic under discussion.  Not necessarily the thread topic but discussion that break out aside from them as well

Examples:

If discussing Obamacare, Joe Biden, Policy etc and you ask "Why didn't you vote for Trump a third time" it won't be answered.

If the discussion is about Cup Drivers being athletic and suddenly pivot to "Why did you stop watching the NFL" it won't be answered.

And remember, if you scoff at that stipulation that means contrary to what you said to me yesterday YOU are unable to discuss issues.  There you have is.  A public pledge.  Your turn.

@Blackvegetable

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am

I pledge publicly to answer BLS questions on a one for one Basis with one stipulation.  The questions must be on the topic under discussion.  Not necessarily the thread topic but discussion that break out aside from them as well

Examples:

If discussing Obamacare, Joe Biden, Policy etc and you ask "Why didn't you vote for Trump a third time" it won't be answered.

If the discussion is about Cup Drivers being athletic and suddenly pivot to "Why did you stop watching the NFL" it won't be answered.

And remember, if you scoff at that stipulation that means contrary to what you said to me yesterday YOU are unable to discuss issues.  There you have is.  A public pledge.  Your turn.

@Blackvegetable

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am

I pledge publicly to answer BLS questions on a one for one Basis with one stipulation.  The questions must be on the topic under discussion.  Not necessarily the thread topic but discussion that break out aside from them as well

Examples:

If discussing Obamacare, Joe Biden, Policy etc and you ask "Why didn't you vote for Trump a third time" it won't be answered.

If the discussion is about Cup Drivers being athletic and suddenly pivot to "Why did you stop watching the NFL" it won't be answered.

And remember, if you scoff at that stipulation that means contrary to what you said to me yesterday YOU are unable to discuss issues.  There you have is.  A public pledge.  Your turn.

@Blackvegetable  
 

 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

BV, just pointing out your newest lie about the pledge.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

BV, just pointing out your newest lie about the pledge.

Post my lie...

Your pledge is a lie.
 

 

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

To clarify, you are saying that my telling cannon pointer to ask questions before he makes assumptions his contradictory to when I tell you no questions when you refuse to answer one?

A simple yes or no will do before I slam you.

You don't answer questions, period.

Even when you pledge to.

 

Huey » less than a minute ago » wrote: ↑

less than a minute ago

Sure:

As anyway can plainly see I said I would if you also took the pledge.  You are busted liar.

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am

I pledge publicly to answer BLS questions on a one for one Basis with one stipulation.  The questions must be on the topic under discussion.  Not necessarily the thread topic but discussion that break out aside from them as well

Examples:

If discussing Obamacare, Joe Biden, Policy etc and you ask "Why didn't you vote for Trump a third time" it won't be answered.

If the discussion is about Cup Drivers being athletic and suddenly pivot to "Why did you stop watching the NFL" it won't be answered.

And remember, if you scoff at that stipulation that means contrary to what you said to me yesterday YOU are unable to discuss issues.  There you have is.  A public pledge.  Your turn.

@Blackvegetable

When asked tough questions you write some lengthy response, bloviating on everything but what you were asked. 

I am used to it.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Are you demanding evidence?

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 11:49 am

I pledge publicly to answer BLS questions on a one for one Basis with one stipulation.  The questions must be on the topic under discussion.  Not necessarily the thread topic but discussion that break out aside from them as well

Examples:

If discussing Obamacare, Joe Biden, Policy etc and you ask "Why didn't you vote for Trump a third time" it won't be answered.

If the discussion is about Cup Drivers being athletic and suddenly pivot to "Why did you stop watching the NFL" it won't be answered.

And remember, if you scoff at that stipulation that means contrary to what you said to me yesterday YOU are unable to discuss issues.  There you have is.  A public pledge.  Your turn.

@Blackvegetable

Young Quimmie sees the flaw in your "pledge"...and he's weary of the deceit.

When asked tough questions you write some lengthy response, bloviating on everything but what you were asked. 

I am used to it.
 

Huey » Today, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:23 pm

I'm good, Psycho Stalker.  It's no skin off my back if you are not going to answer questions.  I kick your *** on a daily basis without asking you any.

Huey » Today, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:20 pm

Nope.  Acknowledge you were answered, Psycho Stalker.

I am not demanding anything.  I am calmly saying I will answer your questions if YOU also take the pledge.  No deal until you do.

Remember,, I have been down this road with you.  Years back you were questioning me,  I would ask you a question after answering.  So on one debate I said I will not answer unless you do.  You said I could ask questions when you were done.  So I agreed.  When my turn came you refused to answer, declaring yourself the winer and ran like a ******

Huey » Today, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:14 pm

Sure:

As anyway can plainly see I said I would if you also took the pledge.  You are busted liar.