Liberal Forum

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 5:19 pm

no ****, that was THOMAS JEFFERSON-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thomas Jefferson argued that the Constitution should act as a "living document" by advocating that each generation, roughly every 19 years, should have the right to revise or create a new constitution. He believed the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.

Jefferson didn't have a DAMN THING to do with writing the Constitution!! He wasn't even in the COUNTRY when it was written, **** PIECE OF PIG ****!!

Damn, you **** **** get DUMBER on each post!!
 

Beekeeper » 27 Feb 2026, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 5:33 pm

Jefferson didn't have a DAMN THING to do with writing the Constitution!! He wasn't even in the COUNTRY when it was written, **** PIECE OF PIG ****!!

Damn, you **** **** get DUMBER on each post!!

jefferson was the one who said the constitution was a living document, dumb ***.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Jefferson argued that the Constitution should act as a "living document" by advocating that each generation, roughly every 19 years, should have the right to revise or create a new constitution. He believed the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 5:40 pm

jefferson was the one who said the constitution was a living document, dumb ***.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Jefferson argued that the Constitution should act as a "living document" by advocating that each generation, roughly every 19 years, should have the right to revise or create a new constitution. He believed the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.

No, MORON, he NEVER said that!! What he DID say was....

Thomas Jefferson famously wrote a letter to James Madison in 1789 in which he said that the earth belongs to the living, the earth belongs to the living, not to the dead. This letter is frequently quoted in favor of interpreting the Constitution as a living, breathing document.

And MADISON shot him down saying that a "temporary" document would result in mass confusion and a end to the Republic. AND that provisions were in the Constitution to change it, be it SLOWLY AND WITH GREAT THOUGHT REQUIRED TO DO SO!!

Now, GO **** YOUR STUPID PIECE OF **** SELF AND SHUT THE **** UP!! YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CONSTITUTI)ONAL HISTORY YOU G'DAMN IDIOT!!

Beekeeper » 27 Feb 2026, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 5:44 pm

No, MORON, he NEVER said that!! What he DID say was....

Thomas Jefferson famously wrote a letter to James Madison in 1789 in which he said that the earth belongs to the living, the earth belongs to the living, not to the dead. This letter is frequently quoted in favor of interpreting the Constitution as a living, breathing document.

And MADISON shot him down saying that a "temporary" document would result in mass confusion and a end to the Republic. AND that provisions were in the Constitution to change it, be it SLOWLY AND WITH GREAT THOUGHT REQUIRED TO DO SO!!

Now, GO **** YOUR STUPID PIECE OF **** SELF AND SHUT THE **** UP!! YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CONSTITUTI)ONAL HISTORY YOU G'DAMN IDIOT!!

and there you admit maddison as well was okay with changes



what happened to--------------------- Didn't YOUR SIDE claim that the Constitution was a "living breathing document" and subject to MANY different interpretations?? -----------------------------------------

I think I told Rhudes Skuller he could achive orgasm with his left hand if he really worked at it..

On Page 1..

Everyone is pointing fingers.. No one is trying to figure out what is wrong..

@roadkill  spreads misinformation for the Kremlin in the hopes that @MR-7  ends up wth Melania's Dildo in his right hand and his dick in his left..
 

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 5:40 pm

jefferson was the one who said the constitution was a living document, dumb ***.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Jefferson argued that the Constitution should act as a "living document" by advocating that each generation, roughly every 19 years, should have the right to revise or create a new constitution. He believed the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.

I met one of Jefferson's advisors...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LxQLmcTc54
 

roadkill » 27 Feb 2026, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 6:35 pm

I met one of Jefferson's advisors...

youtube /watch?v=5LxQLmcTc54

Poof the K$shpah..  Kareem don't like it..

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm

is al capone exonerated because john dillinger was bad or even worse?

yes or no.

     

Thank you. Gee, not predictable at all.
Since my answer doesn't matter because I know you just want to win a stupid chat how about you take the win. Pouring more and more side issues and irrelevant comparisons is a ploy.
As it is I can barely tolerate your persona, champ. You are for violence. No biggie.

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 3:34 pm

**** I said this------------you prove you are an IDIOT every time you post.----------------------

I never said anything about turkeys and I have made many comments.

:   :

BlaVe sok. If you're not a sok, I must have thought it was him.
Honest mistake. 

btw
Progs all start to seem the same to me after a while.
I'll try to keep you separate in the future.  

DeezerShoove » 27 Feb 2026, 11:19 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 11:19 pm

     

Thank you. Gee, not predictable at all.
Since my answer doesn't matter because I know you just want to win a stupid chat how about you take the win. Pouring more and more side issues and irrelevant comparisons is a ploy.
As it is I can barely tolerate your persona, champ. You are for violence. No biggie.

it is not a side issue.

I am tired of people always justifying trump by bringing up someone else

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3XIBSfyfVPM
 

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.

------------------------------------------------------------
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), signed by President Obama in 2010, prohibits insurance companies from denying coverage, charging higher premiums, or excluding benefits based on pre-existing conditions. This mandate ensures that individuals with conditions like asthma, cancer, or diabetes can obtain coverage

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.

----------------------------------------

Key protections regarding pre-existing conditions under the ACA include:

• Guaranteed Issue: Insurance companies cannot refuse coverage based on health status.
• No Higher Rates: Insurers cannot charge more due to health history.
• No Coverage Exclusions: Plans must cover treatment for pre-existing conditions.

 

/////////////Before the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare, the US health insurance market often denied coverage or charged higher premiums for pre-existing conditions like asthma or cancer. Insurers frequently imposed lifetime or annual limits on care, and millions were uninsured. The individual market was often inaccessible, and coverage was less comprehensive...............................

.........................//////////////////Pre-existing Conditions: Insurers frequently denied coverage or charged exorbitant premiums to people with conditions like diabetes, cancer, or even pregnancy, treating them as "risky".
Limits on Care: Policies often had annual or lifetime dollar caps on coverage, meaning patients with severe illnesses could run out of insurance.
Individual Market Challenges: The market for buying personal insurance was often unaffordable, with limited benefits and high out-of-pocket costs.
Limited Protections: There was no guaranteed issue of coverage, meaning insurers could reject applicants based on health status.///////////////////////////////////////////////
 

While the dems are gnashing what's left of their teeth...Trump is having fun with the folks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KTkBzAH5d0
 

jerrab » 28 Feb 2026, 12:18 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2026, 12:18 am

----------------------------------------

Key protections regarding pre-existing conditions under the ACA include:

• Guaranteed Issue: Insurance companies cannot refuse coverage based on health status.
• No Higher Rates: Insurers cannot charge more due to health history.
• No Coverage Exclusions: Plans must cover treatment for pre-existing conditions.

Wonderful.
That's sounds way less expensive.

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 11:29 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 11:29 pm

it is not a side issue.

I am tired of people always justifying trump by bringing up someone else

You mean fighting fire with fire?
Progs do that constantly. Learn to live with it coming back at you. No biggie.

DeezerShoove » 28 Feb 2026, 1:29 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2026, 1:29 am

You mean fighting fire with fire?
Progs do that constantly. Learn to live with it coming back at you. No biggie.

So should the left assasinate Trump to end the War in Iran this morning?

A lot of soldiers may have to learn to die for his bullshyt.

I don't recall progressives being advocates for Wars to distract from elite cabal pedophiliaism.