Liberal Forum

jerrab » 26 Feb 2026, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 1:22 pm

what are you a commedian or something? the republican party only cares about trump, not america, not the constitution and especially not american citizens (unless of course they are billionaires).

---------------------------------------------------------

• Ideal Size: Following the 2020 census, the ideal population for a U.S. House district is approximately 761,000 people.
• Number of Districts: The House of Representatives is capped at 435 voting members (since 1929).
• Redistricting: Article I, Section 2 requires a census every 10 years for reapportionment, which triggers the redrawing of district lines.
• Contiguity: Districts must be contiguous, meaning they must be a single, uninterrupted, and connected shape.

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.  

roadkill » 26 Feb 2026, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 3:55 pm

If you can prove they actually allowed you in a school we can start a Go Fund Tard account and sue them.  

it appears you can't prove you graduated.

too bad, I can't send you this beautiful, semi authentic diploma for only $49.95, not including postage.

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.

yes he  has victimized me. the proposed map he wants extends far beyond the area.

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.

 new, heavily partisan gerrymandered congressional map was passed by the Republican-controlled Missouri legislature in September 2025 (HB 1) and signed by Governor Mike Kehoe, with the explicit goal of flipping the Democratic-held 5th District to Republican control. 
Missouri Independent +2
Key Aspects of the 2025 Redrawn District 5:

• Expansion & Dilution: The 5th District, anchored in Kansas City, has been significantly redrawn to include vast, rural, and heavily conservative areas, stretching nearly 200 miles east toward Columbia.

 

jerrab » 26 Feb 2026, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 5:09 pm

yes he  has victimized me. the proposed map he wants extends far beyond the area.

       

oh, I forgot...       All better.

Congressional District 5: Missouri's 5th Congressional District is located in the Kansas City area

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 5:15 pm

       

oh, I forgot...       All better.

////////////////// stretching nearly 200 miles east toward Columbia./////////////////

totally against the constitution and I hope tucker gets the nomination and kicks war monger trump to the curb

jerrab » 26 Feb 2026, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 5:19 pm

////////////////// stretching nearly 200 miles east toward Columbia./////////////////

totally against the constitution and I hope tucker gets the nomination and kicks war monger trump to the curb

I'm rooting for you and your future happiness.

My happiness isn't tied so tightly to politics that I can't find it when an asshole holds office.

jerrab » 26 Feb 2026, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 5:19 pm

////////////////// stretching nearly 200 miles east toward Columbia./////////////////

totally against the constitution and I hope tucker gets the nomination and kicks war monger trump to the curb

Really now. That's funny how the US Constitution gives NO GUIDANCE on how Congression Districts are to be drawn!!

It' TOTALLY leaves that up to the States to determine how to draw their lines and specifically the STATE LEGISLATURE!!

That has to really suck for you PIECES OF PIG ****, huh, MORON!!

       

Beekeeper » 26 Feb 2026, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 5:38 pm

Really now. That's funny how the US Constitution gives NO GUIDANCE on how Congression Districts are to be drawn!!

It' TOTALLY leaves that up to the States to determine how to draw their lines and specifically the STATE LEGISLATURE!!

That has to really suck for you PIECES OF PIG ****, huh, MORON!!

     

-----------------------------------Congressional districts must be as equal as practicable. This requirement comes, in part, from the Supreme Court’s decision in Wesberry v. Sanders, where the Court held that, “the command of Art. I, s 2, that the Representatives be chosen ‘by the People of the several States’ means that as nearly as is practicable one man’s vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another’s.”

 Later cases on congressional apportionment have found that congressional districts are permitted to have some deviations from complete equality in population, but these deviations must be small and justified by a legitimate state policy. Despite permitting some deviation in earlier challenges to congressional maps, in Evenwel v. Abbott, the Supreme Court again reiterated that, “States must draw congressional districts with populations as close to perfect equality as possible.”As such, the guiding standard for congressional districts is, “close to perfect equality as possible.”State and Local Legislative Districts

 Historically, in Reynold v. Sims, the Court found that the one person, one vote doctrine applied to state apportionment schemes, meaning that state legislative districts required equal population.  The Reynolds Court wrote that:By holding that as a federal constitutional requisite both houses of a state legislature must be apportioned on a population basis, we mean that the Equal Protection Clause [of the Fourteenth Amendment] requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.In Avery v. Midland County, the Court applied the one person, one vote principle to local election districts, finding that voters in local jurisdictions were constitutionally entitled to having their votes carrying a substantially similar weight to that of any other voter.As of 2021, One Person, One Vote applies to congressional, state legislative, and local election districts. The Supreme Court has, however, upheld population deviations for state legislative and local apportionment that achieve only substantial population equality. In the context of state and local legislative districting, districts may deviate from perfect population equality, “[w]here the maximum population deviation between the largest and smallest district is less than 10%[. A] state or local legislative map presumptively complies with the one-person, one-vote rule,” as long as the deviations are justified by a “legitimate consideration.”Despite having larger permissible deviations, any deviation from absolute equality, no matter how small, still must be justified by “legitimate considerations.”Population Basis

 Currently, nearly every jurisdiction utilizes total population to equalize districts. Under the U.S. Constitution, total population has been found to be the only permissible population basis for congressional districts. In Evenwel v. Abbott, the Court held that state and local election districts, “may draw its legislative districts based on total population.” The question of whether a state could use citizen voting age population to redistrict, if permitted under state law, is not yet resolved but there are good arguments that such a system would run afoul of federal law.Drawing Lines Based on Race

jerrab » 26 Feb 2026, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 8:29 pm

-----------------------------------Congressional districts must be as equal as practicable. This requirement comes, in part, from the Supreme Court’s decision in Wesberry v. Sanders, where the Court held that, “the command of Art. I, s 2, that the Representatives be chosen ‘by the People of the several States’ means that as nearly as is practicable one man’s vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another’s.”

 Later cases on congressional apportionment have found that congressional districts are permitted to have some deviations from complete equality in population, but these deviations must be small and justified by a legitimate state policy. Despite permitting some deviation in earlier challenges to congressional maps, in Evenwel v. Abbott, the Supreme Court again reiterated that, “States must draw congressional districts with populations as close to perfect equality as possible.”As such, the guiding standard for congressional districts is, “close to perfect equality as possible.”State and Local Legislative Districts

 Historically, in Reynold v. Sims, the Court found that the one person, one vote doctrine applied to state apportionment schemes, meaning that state legislative districts required equal population.  The Reynolds Court wrote that:By holding that as a federal constitutional requisite both houses of a state legislature must be apportioned on a population basis, we mean that the Equal Protection Clause [of the Fourteenth Amendment] requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.In Avery v. Midland County, the Court applied the one person, one vote principle to local election districts, finding that voters in local jurisdictions were constitutionally entitled to having their votes carrying a substantially similar weight to that of any other voter.As of 2021, One Person, One Vote applies to congressional, state legislative, and local election districts. The Supreme Court has, however, upheld population deviations for state legislative and local apportionment that achieve only substantial population equality. In the context of state and local legislative districting, districts may deviate from perfect population equality, “[w]here the maximum population deviation between the largest and smallest district is less than 10%[. A] state or local legislative map presumptively complies with the one-person, one-vote rule,” as long as the deviations are justified by a “legitimate consideration.”Despite having larger permissible deviations, any deviation from absolute equality, no matter how small, still must be justified by “legitimate considerations.”Population Basis

 Currently, nearly every jurisdiction utilizes total population to equalize districts. Under the U.S. Constitution, total population has been found to be the only permissible population basis for congressional districts. In Evenwel v. Abbott, the Court held that state and local election districts, “may draw its legislative districts based on total population.” The question of whether a state could use citizen voting age population to redistrict, if permitted under state law, is not yet resolved but there are good arguments that such a system would run afoul of federal law.Drawing Lines Based on Race

COURT CASES, NOT CONSTITUTION, YOU **** IDIOT!!

Please, stop. YOU are embarrassing yourself massively and obviously, TOO **** STUPID TO KNOW WHEN TO SHUT THE **** UP!!

Beekeeper » 27 Feb 2026, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 6:36 am

COURT CASES, NOT CONSTITUTION, YOU **** IDIOT!!

Please, stop. YOU are embarrassing yourself massively and obviously, TOO **** STUPID TO KNOW WHEN TO SHUT THE **** UP!!

dumb **** ****--- the constitution is used to resolve court cases.


https://constitution.congress.gov/resou ... onal-laws/

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.

you prove you are an IDIOT every time you post.

         

/////////////Court cases are  resolved by the U.S. Constitution, interpreted by the Supreme Court, have shaped American law by defining federal powers, civil rights, and liberties./////////////////////

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 3:00 pm

you prove you are an IDIOT every time you post.

         

/////////////Court cases are  resolved by the U.S. Constitution, interpreted by the Supreme Court, have shaped American law by defining federal powers, civil rights, and liberties./////////////////////

You say nothing. What the **** does your copy/paste add?
The last actual comment you made was when you expressed concern about turkeys wandering around by your apartment building.
Since then it's been years of "Duh, you are studip... Soe g,damd studip."

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm

dumb **** ****--- the constitution is used to resolve court cases.

https://constitution.congress.gov/resou ... onal-laws/

I appreciate yer naivety...but yer right. It actually happens sometimes.  

DeezerShoove » 27 Feb 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 3:12 pm

You say nothing. What the **** does your copy/paste add?
The last actual comment you made was when you expressed concern about turkeys wandering around by your apartment building.
Since then it's been years of "Duh, you are studip... Soe g,damd studip."

**** I said this------------you prove you are an IDIOT every time you post.----------------------

I never said anything about turkeys and I have made many comments.

   

Every discussion about the topic of left vs right when both sides are socially constructed to behave the same way through leaderships and fellowships, multi-levels of authority separate institutions for services rendered to citizens of contextual realities set by law and order conditional behavior cradle to grave regardless which generation one arrived in.

So if left is worse than right, but both are socially engineered same way is it leaderships or fellowships being the problem?

Is it actual results of evolving gone wrong or interpretating life beyond evolving in plain sight creating the mayhem, madness, misery against anyone not taking sides creating the mythological silent majority of ancestors not role playing a type cast people defending their literal stereotypical behavior cradle tog rave every generation gap forward daily here?

When history repeats itself it is called legal precedence, social consensus, human rights, to believe life is anything other than self evident time each ancestor is limited to adapting in space by heart beat and brain navigating their relative time lived since date of birth because every reproduction in the food chain in this universal location's atmosphere was conceived by its previous generation gaps lived so far.

that self evident truth most people serving God and country always ignore for their ideas life must be more than genetic outcomes only existing as equally timed apart now..

DeezerShoove » 26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Feb 2026, 4:05 pm

How has he victimized you so horribly? Your irrational hatred seems to be manufactured.
Are you a brainwashed or sumpin?

You want me to be a fellow Trump-hater. I'd have to dig pretty hard to find that personal injustice.
So far all you people have is stuff that could easily be attributed to any number of politicians.
Sorry, but . . . snoozers . . .

How's about you try to "bookend" Trump administrations with another token asswipe like Bammy?
If Joe the **** had done anything good, I would have been supportive. He was president.
Same with Bammy the Opaque.

Do you have the character necessary to look past your brainwash-induced hatred to do that?
You haven't shown that quality so I can only assume you are a partisan hack. Prove me wrong.

is al capone exonerated because john dillinger was bad or even worse?

yes or no.

jerrab » 27 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm

dumb **** ****--- the constitution is used to resolve court cases.

https://constitution.congress.gov/resou ... onal-laws/

So NOW you are claiming ORIGINALITY in interpreting the Constitution!!

Didn't YOUR SIDE claim that the Constitution was a "living breathing document" and subject to MANY different interpretations?? And the reason WHY "laws" got written FROM THE BENCH rather than from CONGRESS!! Wanna talk about ABORTION and how THAT would got cut from whole cloth when the CONSTITITOIN gave NO COURT any authority to make it LEGAL nationwide??

Or how about how the COURTS finally corrected that **** RULING by tossing it back to the States where BY THE CONSTITUTION, where it belongs to determine legality or not!!

You **** **** are so g'damn STUPID that you talk out both sides of your mouth and THEN LIE ABOUT IT CLAIMING YOU DIDN'T!!

         

Beekeeper » 27 Feb 2026, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2026, 4:53 pm

So NOW you are claiming ORIGINALITY in interpreting the Constitution!!

Didn't YOUR SIDE claim that the Constitution was a "living breathing document" and subject to MANY different interpretations?? And the reason WHY "laws" got written FROM THE BENCH rather than from CONGRESS!! Wanna talk about ABORTION and how THAT would got cut from whole cloth when the CONSTITITOIN gave NO COURT any authority to make it LEGAL nationwide??



       

no ****, that was THOMAS JEFFERSON-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thomas Jefferson argued that the Constitution should act as a "living document" by advocating that each generation, roughly every 19 years, should have the right to revise or create a new constitution. He believed the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.