So how many American Investors are in the Eurpoean Curve?
A 4 week comp?

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Fuelman » 27 Feb 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Say what you will about Financial Advisors, ours moved 30% of our equity stake into foreign markets a year ago.
Do you see the big dip?ROG62 » 27 Feb 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ A 4 week comp?![]()
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/u-s-vs ... rformance/
stop, just stop…you’re…Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Do you see the big dip?
Do you remember "Liberation Day"?
So **** g'ddammned stupid


JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do you see the big dip?
Do you remember "Liberation Day"?
So **** g'ddammned stupid
The World markets, ex. US...Beekeeper » 27 Feb 2026, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ The Big Dip??
You mean the PEFECT TIME to get into the markets FULLY??
Where are you finding this ****?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
It's coming down Foolman.. I would up that to 70% if I were you.Fuelman » 27 Feb 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Say what you will about Financial Advisors, ours moved 30% of our equity stake into foreign markets a year ago.
@ROG62 has to keep a little wind sock in his bathroom to make sure it gets in the toilet.Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Do you see the big dip?
Do you remember "Liberation Day"?
So **** g'ddammned stupid
He's a remarkably stupid human being.JohnnyYou » 27 Feb 2026, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ @ROG62 has to keep a little wind sock in his bathroom to make sure it gets in the toilet.
Speaking of you being a remarkably stupid human being, check this out:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
I probably won't say anything unless he brings it up. Annual coming soon.Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ Did you hector him for his lack enthusiasm for MAGA?
You're right..Vegas » 27 Feb 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Speaking of you being a remarkably stupid human being, check this out:
Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.
Or
you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Yet, you still have not debunked it...other than because you said so. Evidence! **** your assertions.
Maybe so. My guy has several thousand number crunchers behind him for direction so he probably does not vary much from that information.JohnnyYou » 27 Feb 2026, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ It's coming down Foolman.. I would up that to 70% if I were you.