You're a coward.
Don't know if they still do but decades ago, before my time, those that graduated Parris Island laughed at the west coast guys, calling them Hollywood Marines.roadkill » 05 Mar 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ Suddenly you care about the troops. I call ****:
https://youtu.be/UGTwqoRFJN4?si=sRB8fA5RW0YpFL96
That's where my brother went to boot camp.
Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ Don't know if they still do but decades ago, before my time, those that graduated Parris Island laughed at the west coast guys, calling them Hollywood Marines.
I wouldn't mess with them no matter where they trained.
You run from questions, even your own words.
Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ Coward? Me? How is that, Options? I bet you're among the idiots who screamed to high even the a High Mobility Multi Wheeled Vehicle should have been armored.
The building had concrete barriers surrounding it, the source said — typical for military structures overseas to protect against things like car bombs — but nothing that could shield it from drones or missiles
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/politics ... ike-kuwait
And if they were in a line until the command center would have been a tent or a vehicle. Your stupidity is boundless.
WTF?And if they were in a line until the command center would have been a tent or a vehicle. Your stupidity is boundless.
Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑
Coward? Me? How is that, Options? I bet you're among the idiots who screamed to high even the a High Mobility Multi Wheeled Vehicle should have been armored.
The building had concrete barriers surrounding it, the source said — typical for military structures overseas to protect against things like car bombs — but nothing that could shield it from drones or missiles
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/politics ... ike-kuwait
And if they were in a line until the command center would have been a tent or a vehicle. Your stupidity is boundless.
Try again. As you edited the portions of the post concerning your post. THAT is the move of a coward who is unablle to make a case without questions.Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑You run from questions, even your own words.
Yes....Coward.
Tiny,Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑
Try again. As you edited the portions of the post concerning your post. THAT is the move of a coward who is unablle to make a case without questions.
All you gotta do is take the pledge. One for one, Too Far. But you are afraid. Very afraid
I you had chose different Options you would understand that read as follows:Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ Coward? Me? How is that, Options? I bet you're among the idiots who screamed to high even the a High Mobility Multi Wheeled Vehicle should have been armored.
The building had concrete barriers surrounding it, the source said — typical for military structures overseas to protect against things like car bombs — but nothing that could shield it from drones or missiles
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/politics ... ike-kuwait
And if they were in a line until the command center would have been a tent or a vehicle. Your stupidity is boundless.WTF?And if they were in a line until the command center would have been a tent or a vehicle. Your stupidity is boundle
Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑
Try again. As you edited the portions of the post concerning your post. THAT is the move of a coward who is unablle to make a case without questions.
All you gotta do is take the pledge. One for one, Too Far. But you are afraid. Very afraid
All you gotta do is take the pledge. One for one, Too Far. But you are afraid. Very afraid
LMAO! I addressing the actual **** content of your post, Snow Bunny. You are the dumbest POS with an education I have ever had the displeasure of being interacting with.Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑Tiny,Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑
Try again. As you edited the portions of the post concerning your post. THAT is the move of a coward who is unablle to make a case without questions.
All you gotta do is take the pledge. One for one, Too Far. But you are afraid. Very afraid
When you address the actual content of posts, you can start bitching.
Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑
Coward? Me? How is that, Options? I bet you're among the idiots who screamed to high even the a High Mobility Multi Wheeled Vehicle should have been armored.
The building had concrete barriers surrounding it, the source said — typical for military structures overseas to protect against things like car bombs — but nothing that could shield it from drones or missiles
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/politics ... ike-kuwait
And if they were in a line until the command center would have been a tent or a vehicle. Your stupidity is boundless.
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑Building where US troops were killed was largely unfortified: Officialsroadkill » 05 Mar 2026, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ **** happens you moron. All pilots lived...which is more than we can say about the 13 Americans that were murdered by the Afghans when Biden withdraw before the Afghans complied with the terms of the withdrawal.
Yer a true POS Bv. When you graduated from college did they give you a diploma or a red nose?
The structure was effectively a large trailer with little aerial defense.
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑
Try again. As you edited the portions of the post concerning your post. THAT is the move of a coward who is unablle to make a case without questions.
All you gotta do is take the pledge. One for one, Too Far. But you are afraid. Very afraidAll you gotta do is take the pledge. One for one, Too Far. But you are afraid. Very afraid
No, I don't...not because you are a zero integrity coward
So, in shortHuey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I you had chose different Options you would understand that read as follows:
And if the were in a line UNIT......
This isn't about me. he is about you talking point about the makeshift command center. In war, Options, you don't always have the options of completely fortified C&Cs, or anything for that matter.Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑So, in shortHuey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I you had chose different Options you would understand that read as follows:
And if the were in a line UNIT......
You're an idiot "Because Blackvegetable...."
It's not "BS".
So why all the squealing over "Abbey Road"?Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't about me. he is about you talking point about the makeshift command center. In war, Options, you don't always have the options of completely fortified C&Cs, or anything for that matter.
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ It's not "BS".
Any US asset is "fair play"....and anything within reach of Iranian missiles or drones is a target.
We decided to sink one of their ships in the Indian Ocean.
For FOXfodder...
No ****, Options. It is called war.Any US asset is "fair play"....and anything within reach of Iranian missiles or drones is a target.
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ So why all the squealing over "Abbey Road"?
Biden didn't pick that fight...
Huey » 05 Mar 2026, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ We don't alway's pick the fights we end up being responsible for.
And yes, Biden did choose that fight:
Yes, then-Senator Joe Biden voted in favor of the October 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that launched the war in Afghanistan
. As part of a 98-0 Senate vote just days after the 9/11 attacks, Biden supported the initial military action. He later opposed the 2009 troop surge
He also chose it when he decided to run for office.
"Accountability".We don't alway's pick the fights we end up being responsible for. And yes, Biden did choose that fight: