Cannonpointer » Today, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ This was the answer I gave him:
He peanut galleried it.
Because he was embarrassed.
of course he did…but then again, because master ******…Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ This was the answer I gave him:
He peanut galleried it.
Because he was embarrassed.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom because master ******…DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 11:21 pm » wrote: ↑ The **** protects his narrative at all times.
Whether it's this **** or abandoning a thread like a hysterical wimp, feeling trapped, he runs.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You talk a lot of ****.Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2026, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I know how to read a chart, fruitcake.
That's more than you can say.
Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2026, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You made OUR point when you skirt hiked this into the peanut gallery, sissy panty:
This was the answer I gave him:
He peanut galleried it.
Because he was embarrassed.
What would be the complement of "no conviction or charge"?What the chart does NOT show is how many of the data points (border-***) in the set remain under charges currently and simply have not YET been convicted.
So thare's that.
As an unemployed icebox salesman, you'd have problems buying a ham sandwich......JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ @Cannonpointer would have trouble indicting a ham sandwich.
Blackvegetable » Today, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ What would be the complement of "no conviction or charge"?
Read the question.
And you speak ABOUT my arguments - not to them.
What is the complement of "no charges, no convictions"?
Either answer the question or feck off...
Obviously another "bridge too far"...Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ This graph not only tells the story of the Immigration Invasion Hoax, it strips the bark right off it.
MAGATs!
Can any of you describe what this graph makes abundantly clear?

Blackvegetable » 08 Mar 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ Obviously another "bridge too far"...
Let's try it another way...
In a 6 week period ICE took 3,258 "illegals" convicted of crimes of violence off US streets.
Given an annual budget of 180 billion, 6 weeks of Immigration theater costs 21 billion.
That's just short of 700,000 per "convicted violent criminal".....and rising.
Huey » 08 Mar 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ Well, that's all folks. This thread had be thoroughly refuted.
Move along, nothing to see here.
This thread had be thoroughly refuted.
Huey » Today, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ Well, that's all folks. This thread had be thoroughly refuted.
Move along, nothing to see here.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom