I am all for it.
Is the 92-year-old whore still hanging on?
**** lips
Good and triggered. Keep dancing for me, ***. Got you right where I want you. You're so triggered you're literally mentioning me in threads I haven't even posted in. Rent-free in your head, bitch. Rent-free.*Roshambo » 06 Mar 2026, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ **** lips![]()
my mom can and will kick your **** *** and we will cheer her on.![]()
thanks for asking you dumb father ****![]()
![]()
Fewer buyers does not result in lower prices. You want dealers who buy in volume and pass the savings on to you.*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Mar 2026, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I am all for it.
This should force more minorities to either walk or take the bus....!
This should also make these great engines more affordable for those of us who don't have to spend what's left of our lives posting at internet forums all day and night.......https://www.summitracing.com/search/par ... e/9-4l-572
If you were an engine builder that normally sold 1 big block Chevy engine per week for the past 5 years and suddenly started getting 3 times that many orders for several months straight...I think you would eventually figure out that your price is too low.Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2026, 10:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Fewer buyers does not result in lower prices. You want dealers who buy in volume and pass the savings on to you.
Higher energy prices will make the economy go to ****.
Yeah that just doesn't even follow. COSTS, not whim, drive prices. If you do it in bulk, you can do it cheaper. That's why prototypes cost more than the products that flow from them.*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Mar 2026, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑ If you were an engine builder that normally sold 1 big block Chevy engine per week for the past 5 years and suddenly started getting 3 times that many orders for several months straight...I think you would eventually figure out that your price is too low.
It works the same way in reverse, especially if you figure that your fickle market is not going to be buying as many big block engines because fuel costs are higher than ever. .
Tell me what happened to the price of gas guzzling cars during the gasoline rationing days of the 1970sCannonpointer » 07 Mar 2026, 1:02 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah that just doesn't even follow. COSTS, not whim, drive prices. If you do it in bulk, you can do it cheaper. That's why prototypes cost more than the products that flow from them.
If you were on a train leaving chicago at 6 am travelling 300 mph, you would still be incorrect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-fLAujmRGQ*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 1:06 am » wrote: ↑ Tell me what happened to the price of gas guzzling cars during the gasoline rationing days of the 1970s
They dropped. But you are comparing apples and horse feathers. Those cars were necessary tools, not discretionary toys. They became OUTDATED. They had competition that saved consumers **** tons of money - competition that not only ran on half as much gas, but also held their value better because they were better built. They had six digits on their odometers instead of five, because they were built to run hundreds of thousands of miles.*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 1:06 am » wrote: ↑ Tell me what happened to the price of gas guzzling cars during the gasoline rationing days of the 1970s
Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2026, 1:39 am » wrote: ↑ They dropped. But you are comparing apples and horse feathers.
Yeah..bc everyone needs a 550 HP... L88 427 Vette with 12.5 to 1 compression...General Kinetics solid lifter racing cam, Holley 850 CFM carb..
SouthernFried » 06 Mar 2026, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Good and triggered. Keep dancing for me, ***. Got you right where I want you. You're so triggered you're literally mentioning me in threads I haven't even posted in. Rent-free in your head, bitch. Rent-free.

Your Mom could prbably knock MAGAfried over with a small tap from @murdock s Dad's butt eggplant sex toy.*Roshambo » 07 Mar 2026, 4:06 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
**** lips![]()
my mom can and will kick your **** *** and we will cheer her on.![]()
thanks for asking you dumb father ****![]()
![]()
Why are you making my argument for me?*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 2:18 am » wrote: ↑Yeah..bc everyone needs a 550 HP... L88 427 Vette with 12.5 to 1 compression...General Kinetics solid lifter racing cam, Holley 850 CFM carb..
.or a GTO Judge with the HO 455....
or an Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser station wagon with the [factory underrated] 360HP... 455 cubic inch engine.
You claimed custom big block high performance engines were not going to go down in price due gasoline prices.Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Why are you making my argument for me?
The fewer people who buy that, the more expensive it will be to produce.
Google, "Production at scale."
Correct. I made that claim.*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ You claimed custom big block high performance engines were not going to go down in price due gasoline prices.
You showed me a market shakeup based on new tech and new competition following the removal of import tariffs.*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I showed you where gas guzzlers have historically dropped in price due to lack of interest .
Correct. Ya gotta own a car - ya don't gotta own a monster truck. One is for utility and the other is not.*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Then you claimed my example was "apples and oranges" because one was discretionary and one was necessary
And their prices did not drop.*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Then I just showed you that NOBODY NEEDS 500 cubic inch Caddys, or 450 cubic inch Buicks, Olds, Chevy or Pontiacs...they were entirely discretionary choices to make at a time when you could buy small block equipped cars and trucks that got the job done just fine.