I am all for it.
Is the 92-year-old whore still hanging on?
My mom can and will kick your **** *** and we will cheer her on.
and your daddy is a Somali trick Good and triggered. Keep dancing for me, ***. Got you right where I want you. You're so triggered you're literally mentioning me in threads I haven't even posted in. Rent-free in your head, bitch. Rent-free.*Roshambo » Today, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ **** lips![]()
my mom can and will kick your **** *** and we will cheer her on.![]()
thanks for asking you dumb father ****![]()
![]()
Fewer buyers does not result in lower prices. You want dealers who buy in volume and pass the savings on to you.*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I am all for it.
This should force more minorities to either walk or take the bus....!
This should also make these great engines more affordable for those of us who don't have to spend what's left of our lives posting at internet forums all day and night.......https://www.summitracing.com/search/par ... e/9-4l-572
If you were an engine builder that normally sold 1 big block Chevy engine per week for the past 5 years and suddenly started getting 3 times that many orders for several months straight...I think you would eventually figure out that your price is too low.Cannonpointer » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Fewer buyers does not result in lower prices. You want dealers who buy in volume and pass the savings on to you.
Higher energy prices will make the economy go to ****.
Yeah that just doesn't even follow. COSTS, not whim, drive prices. If you do it in bulk, you can do it cheaper. That's why prototypes cost more than the products that flow from them.*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑ If you were an engine builder that normally sold 1 big block Chevy engine per week for the past 5 years and suddenly started getting 3 times that many orders for several months straight...I think you would eventually figure out that your price is too low.
It works the same way in reverse, especially if you figure that your fickle market is not going to be buying as many big block engines because fuel costs are higher than ever. .
Tell me what happened to the price of gas guzzling cars during the gasoline rationing days of the 1970sCannonpointer » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yeah that just doesn't even follow. COSTS, not whim, drive prices. If you do it in bulk, you can do it cheaper. That's why prototypes cost more than the products that flow from them.
If you were on a train leaving chicago at 6 am travelling 300 mph, you would still be incorrect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-fLAujmRGQ*GHETTOBLASTER » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Tell me what happened to the price of gas guzzling cars during the gasoline rationing days of the 1970s
They dropped. But you are comparing apples and horse feathers. Those cars were necessary tools, not discretionary toys. They became OUTDATED. They had competition that saved consumers **** tons of money - competition that not only ran on half as much gas, but also held their value better because they were better built. They had six digits on their odometers instead of five, because they were built to run hundreds of thousands of miles.*GHETTOBLASTER » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Tell me what happened to the price of gas guzzling cars during the gasoline rationing days of the 1970s
Cannonpointer » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ They dropped. But you are comparing apples and horse feathers.